at this point watching the Slavs fling creative insults at each other is why I come to this thread.
@Agent23 is Bulgarian,and they are turks.Which for unknown reasons do not want care of Mother Turkey,but choosed long dead Mother Russia instead.
Yes,Turks massacred them few times,but....Moscov massacred Poland more,and
@Agent23 still belive,that we should serve putin.
And Ukrainians who fight Moacov are ungrateful.
When he is ungareful to turks for their protection.Strange.
Cyrillic is a Bulgarian invention, it works better for Slavic languages than Latin, also I see Catholicism as a 5th column.
And while some medieval literature was copy-pasted from Byzantium some of it was Bulgarian in origin.
One can argue that the Rus and their successor states were cultural descendants of the First Bulgarian Empire.
Meanwhile the Poles have been trying to be good, to use our dear American friends' terminology House Ni**as, for the west.
I think that a lot of you Poles want to be acknowledged as great and western by the west and that you see most of us eastern orthodox people as unkempt savages that need to be crusaded against.
Also, I am pretty sure that the Jagellon dynasty you hold in such high esteem was Livonian in origin aka a bunch of Crusaders that tried to colonize and conquer the east.
For polish Latin works better.
Russia is dead,so it is unimportant which cultural state sescendents they were
Progressive poles - yes.Normal Sarmatians just lived as they wonted do not caring about other opinions.
Normal poles do not care about other opinions,just like do not care about what orhodox are doing.
Jagiellons were Lithuanian House mixed with real russians,not moscovites.Władysław Jagiełło mother was russian princess.
P.S still do not undarstandt,why do you want us to be laptog od soviets,when you do not want be laptog of turks.
As overlords,they were better then moscovites.