Motherfucker, you said I should have been held back in Kindergarten because you were engaged in bad faith debating in another thread.Look, here, yes, I attacked his idea. In my opinion, it was a bad idea with no actual backing that didn't have enough evidence for it.
I very much disagreed with the idea that the Uniparty would do it, because it's not in line with how the Uniparty operates, and I thought Bacle's argument was bad. That's what being on the internet means: people get to disagree with you. Maybe it was more an attack than people would like.
Basically, more than it not being in their best interest, it's not how the Uniparty operates. The managerial class wants stability. They don't want to use nukes, it doesn't advance their power. More, it doesn't hit what they believe in. Remember, just like everyone else, the Uniparty views themselves as the good guy. And it's hard to justify using a nuke while feeling like the good guy. Especially when you buy into the Uniparty's overall philosophy. They value other's opinions of them, and they know using a nuke would be perceived badly.
Stop pretending you were just 'attacking the idea'; you got caught abusing your position to harass me again, and this time in really stupid fashion.