Airedale260
Well-known member
He said it was only a partial quote on video; my guess is the inference comes from the way the MiG sale/exchange/whatever is going and the knock-on implications from it, as well as Biden's support for it.
I think what Biden is implying, in his stumbling speech, is that if Poland was to unilaterally do the MiG sale to Ukraine, and not requesting the US act as a intermediary, they would still be protected by Article 5, in case Russia decides it counts as NATO entering Ukraine.
Also keep in mind that he knows Poland won’t do the MiG sale without the U.S. replacing them with F-16s. Which we could fairly easily do, but there’s a suggestion that Putin might have privately told him if the fighters were transferred over, they’d be considered an act of war, despite that being entirely business as usual for both sides during the Cold War and an accepted way of doing things.
Putin knows that threatening World War III is the only hope he has of not getting his shit shoved in so far he pukes it up. But at the same time, if his bluff is called, he has two options: 1) Back down and be humiliated even further, or 2) launch and then watch as he personally gets targeted for causing this whole shit storm in the first damn place.
Nobody wants World War III, but at the same time, playing stupid games like this run the risk of causing it. If Putin were to set off chemical weapons in Ukraine, and the gas trickles into Poland? Or he causes a radiological accident (or “accident”) at Chernobyl and it drifts into Western Europe? That is usage of a WMD against NATO members, and at that point, all bets are off and NATO has to respond.
To quote a classic, “The only winning move is not to play.” But Putin ignored this and continues to ignore it at his own peril.