I did.
Well, not "superpower", and I still don't think that's in the cards, but I've been saying that a "neo-Ottoman" expansion strategy is the Turkish long-term goal (and also likely to transpire) for over a decade now.
Unfortunately, I also have every reason to believe that the Turkish loyalty to NATO exists only insofar and for as long as it benefits them. They have zero actual warm feelings towards any of us, and once Russia is effectively out of the picture, that just gives the Turks more of a free hand to make their own play(s). Which China, more likely than not, will be happy to support in exchange for Turkey switching allegiances in due time.
No doubt, a few decades from now, we'll see all the current debates from this thread again. There will be people saying that "Turkey just wants its historic lands on the Balkans back, none of our concern!" And there will be people pointing out that it's better to beat the Turk back before he reaches the gates of Vienna.
(Although, hilariously, one of the most anti-inteventionist people here now is Bulgarian, and might very well be yelling for NATO intervention then. Whereas one of the loudest pro-NATO voices here now is always suspiciously eager to defend every Turkish action in every discussion, and might well be making excuses for Ankara then. I'd find such a reversal very funny.)