Yep, 30,000 emails and not one was classified. There's also a difference between not having sufficient security on confidential emails, and actively showing classified military information to a publisher.
Youre right and I was mistemembering. That said, mens rea is a required element for prosecuting basically all crimes. Also, again, there's a difference between confidential emails that don't have sufficiently secure servers, and classified military documents shared with a publisher.
No? Even if there was prosecutorial misconduct, that would be grounds to punish the prosecutor and possibly replace them, but why on earth would it have any impact on the case? Also, given trump thinks the leak exonerates him (Because he's an idiot.) why would you assume the leak came from the prosecutor? There's also several other groups who'd have the information and ability/reason to leak it.
Again, VERY clear you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Talks with lawyers weren't leaked. Recordings of trump meeting with publishers and using the opportunity to flash some classified military documents for clout were leaked. You have nothing useful to contribute, and you're a moron responding with the first knee-jerk response when one neuron bumps into another one.
That's also not what the idea of fruit from the poison tree refers to. That would be Illegaly obtained evidence, and has nothing to do with whether evidence is leaked or not.