sure bruh. we just both say coolio at eachother and I link a song. I am sure your recordings will finally get him. that the walls are closing in. that this will be the thing that finally beats donald trump. that it won't be revealed that there is additional context should it get to court. that everything will go your way.
But it's not just Joey; it's damn near every kid in the classroom, and yet Trump not only gets singled out, but persecuted well beyond what the law requires. Also, with so many having broken a law that is rarely enforced (and is clearly only being enforced in this case to weaponize the judicial system against a political opponent), you have to consider whether or not the doctrine of desuetude applies.
Yep, that's literally all I did. /s Go listen to the audio recording yourself. Read trump's own response. Inform yourself the absolute bare minimum, and try and learn the difference between arguing an opinion and debating fact.
Name one other person who took classified military information, refused to give it back, defied and lied in the face of a subpoena, and shared it with a publisher. There are several stark, significant and major differences between trump and any of the examples I imagine you're thinking of. For a case that is somewhat similar, Jack Teixeira was charged and is facing up to 60 years in jail. Was he also only pursued because of his political damage to the establishment? Or, because like trump he wilfully and repeatedly broke the law and endangered the country.
Every kid in class may have stolen some crayons but only one [provably] refused to give them back, lied about having them, and had to have his backpack searched.
if hillary, billy and joey did a bad along with half the class but only donald is punished and he was the only black kid in class we would look at the teacher.
I disagree. Et Tu as a legal argument is the only way to effectively fight selective enforcement.
Hillary and her 30k whitewashed emails on that private server would like a word with you.
It did not lack evidence. In 2016, the FBI came right out and said 'She did it, we know she did it, but we've determined she had no criminal intent, so we're not going to charge her for it.'
nah see you forgot that orange man is bad. so fruit of the poisoned tree doesn't apply when confidential talks with lawyers get leaked. please remember in the future when talking with your lawyer anything you tell him can and will be used against you. this absolutely doesn't throw a bomb in the middle of our judicial system that is already viewed as politically motivated from both the left and the right.
Is that what happened or are you completely making it up?
It's happened before. it will happen again. everything done to him will be applied to the heretics who go against the establishment.
Yep, 30,000 emails and not one was classified. There's also a difference between not having sufficient security on confidential emails, and actively showing classified military information to a publisher.
Youre right and I was mistemembering. That said, mens rea is a required element for prosecuting basically all crimes. Also, again, there's a difference between confidential emails that don't have sufficiently secure servers, and classified military documents shared with a publisher.
No? Even if there was prosecutorial misconduct, that would be grounds to punish the prosecutor and possibly replace them, but why on earth would it have any impact on the case? Also, given trump thinks the leak exonerates him (Because he's an idiot.) why would you assume the leak came from the prosecutor? There's also several other groups who'd have the information and ability/reason to leak it.
Again, VERY clear you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Talks with lawyers weren't leaked. Recordings of trump meeting with publishers and using the opportunity to flash some classified military documents for clout were leaked. You have nothing useful to contribute, and you're a moron responding with the first knee-jerk response when one neuron bumps into another one.
1st no we literally know there was
Good to know that Trump can rely on the Battlestar Galactica defense.
www.cbsnews.com
Umm manslaughter still has mens rea an extreme indifference to human life.
It's always good to keep one's facts straight. The point of the audio isn't to demonstrate that that particular document was among the ones he refused to return when asked (the charges are, as is commonly the case, more about the coverup than the initial incident) but rather to demonstrate that he was fully aware of the fact that he had not declassified the classified documents he took home.