Even if we were to handwave and dismiss ALL that....several states changed their election laws in an illegal manner shortly before the election.
They did it openly and in public view. This is not a contested fact. It's reality.
This alone, could have been enough to rig the election.
So even if we ignore ALL that other stuff, here's one smoking gun that's out in the open that cannot be denied.
But oh noes, some lefties who were never going to vote for the GOP in the first place might think we look bad if we talk about it.
There is a clear difference between "democrats rigged the game by running the election under illegal rules they crammed through under the excuse of covid, and then under those rules Biden won", and the ever shifting morass of "evidence" that people like Bacle keep waving around, which two years later is still just a bunch of disconnected claims that constantly vanish after being debunked and are replaced with new ones. "They made people use sharpies so the votes didn't count!", "oh, snap, that never happened, uh they dumped a of ballots in the middle of the night!", "oh, that's bunk too....uh, a postal worker mishandled some mailbags!", "wait, that didn't change anything....uh we found 2000 mules that moved votes around", "oh, wait, that's all BS to.....uh, let's audit the election!", "
crap, Biden won after the recount and also our handpicked auditors are clowns and thier report is full of nonsense", and pretty soon there will be some other thing.
I cam recognize people desperately wanting to reach some pre-determined conclusion, and getting strung along by a series of grifters feeding them lies to keep the money flowing (we all sgoyld,should, this is exactly what happened to the left with the phony "Russia Collusion" crap). The fact that, after two years, there's still no coherent theory about what happened, no effort to lay out a theory of the crime and make a case to people for what happened, how, etc. It's all just "There's so much evidence!!" And them I'm supposed to build you case for you. The Russia grifters put in more effort than that.
Instead it's all crap like this:
pretend the audit in AZ didn't find a lot of fuckery,
The one that was factually wrong at numerous points (and if you dispute the findings off the officials who found fault with the audit....on what basis, Mr Random Guy From The Internet With No Relevant Expertise Whatsoever?), and still concluded Biden won, by a higher figure than the official result?
lets ignore the election worker data being sent to the CCP,
And this proves....what? That they blackmailed a bunch of them into swinging the election for Biden? This is the problem with all your "evidence", you just go "this weird thing might have happened, therefore Trump actually won because reasons".
lets ignore the glowies on Jan 6th,
The ones that.....time traveled back to November 8th and rigged the election? What relevance does the riot have to the election that preceeded it?
let's ignore Robert's forcing SCOTUS to not even look at election cases at the discovery level,
I think you mean before they even got to discovery, which was the right call. You have to prove a likelihood of success on the merits before you get to discovery, you can't sue people on the off chance they're guilty and then go looking for evidence to prove it.
before the election on 'lack of standing' and afterwards on 'mootness',
Yes, the courts ducked out of resolving a number of issues because they didn't want to be seen meddling (and also because many of the cases filed were moot, by people that lacked standing, or just flat out baseless). That's bad. But it doesn't prove that Trump actually won.
and let's pretend that you aren't knowingly gaslighting a large part of this board with your 'Trump lost legitly'
The fact that you lose your mind when I tell you things you don't want to hear is not my problem or fault.
when you know we have evidence to the contrary on this very board, and plenty of other folks have their own pieces of evidence.
I'm fully aware you have "evidence". I just think it's all crap evidence that doesn't prove anything, and that your side's refusal to actually use this evidence to build a case and instead using it as a rethorical bludgeon further proves the hollowness of your claim.