Every time I've posted in a thread that has anything to do with the Confederates here I've never been shy about my Union sympathies, but yeah holy shit, literally digging up & desecrating the dead is a bridge way too far. It calls to mind a sentiment I've seen in some far-left echochambers online: the sort of histrionic leftist psycho who cannot make peace with history as the real-life soldiers of the Civil War did with one another, who the real Radical Republicans would shoot in a fury for advocating subjecting the entire post-war South to the Haiti treatment, and who holds nothing but contempt for the average white Southerner today if they don't think the latter should just be packed off to a death camp.Digging up Graves is a new low.
Every time I've posted in a thread that has anything to do with the Confederates here I've never been shy about my Union sympathies, but yeah holy shit, literally digging up & desecrating the dead is a bridge way too far. It calls to mind a sentiment I've seen in some far-left echochambers online: the sort of histrionic leftist psycho who cannot make peace with history as the real-life soldiers of the Civil War did with one another, who the real Radical Republicans would shoot in a fury for advocating subjecting the entire post-war South to the Haiti treatment, and who holds nothing but contempt for the average white Southerner today if they don't think the latter should just be packed off to a death camp.
Everyone who said this wouldn't stop at statues being taken down has just been proven to be 100% right.
Looking at even just the past few years, I don't think the far left particularly cares about having a consistent standard, and they certainly don't have a sense of shame so it's basically impossible to shame them into even feeling bad about their blatant hypocrisy (much less to get them to actually do anything about it). If it's (insert atrocity) being done to or said about their team (any member thereof, up to & including or especially the likes of Mao/Stalin) it's stochastic terrorism, literal domestic terrorism, a hate crime, ontologically evil, etc. But if it's being done to their enemy though, it's to be celebrated, a necessary correction of historical injustice, well-deserved, etc. Simple as that.Yeah, not really into grave destruction myself, to be honest. But so long as we’re playing that game, why don’t we do the same for the communists, too, seeing as they probably tortured, oppressed, and mass-murdered more people in one century than slave owners over multiple centuries ever had?
Normally, I don’t care one way or another that Lenin’s body remains preserved and on display in Red Square, or that Mao got both that and a goddamned memorial hall to go with it. However, I’d like to see a little more consistency and even-handedness while we’re at it, though even ignoring how Russia and China would laugh in your face and “disappear” you if you suggested it, something tells me most of the people calling for grave desecrations for Group A have a not-to-secret “soft spot” for Group B…
Purity spirals last until there's only one left, as the others had been purged.Next I figure they'll go for union officers from the Civil War who also fought in the various wars against the native Americans which is a bloody sizeable chunk of them
For the US probably the banana wars than WWIPurity spirals last until there's only one left, as the others had been purged.
After the Union soldiers/generals, it'll likely be those from WW1, then WW2...
Looking at even just the past few years, I don't think the far left particularly cares about having a consistent standard, and they certainly don't have a sense of shame so it's basically impossible to shame them into even feeling bad about their blatant hypocrisy (much less to get them to actually do anything about it). If it's (insert atrocity) being done to or said about their team (any member thereof, up to & including or especially the likes of Mao/Stalin) it's stochastic terrorism, literal domestic terrorism, a hate crime, ontologically evil, etc. But if it's being done to their enemy though, it's to be celebrated, a necessary correction of historical injustice, well-deserved, etc. Simple as that.
Or in short, as the meme would put it, 'if the left didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all'.
"But we aren't doing it! We are merely forcing you to uncover your ancestor's graves to prevent us defiling them!"Digging up Graves is a new low.
At some point someone is going to snap and snipe one or more of these politicians and activists as loath as I am to say that"But we aren't doing it! We are merely forcing you to uncover your ancestor's graves to prevent us defiling them!"
That's what they are going to argue. There is no talking with them.
Confederate Monument to Reunification and Reconciliation Monument Being Removed from Arlington National Cemetery.
Confederate Memorial at Arlington National Cemetery to be removed despite GOP opposition
Despite opposition from Republicans in Congress, the U.S Army will remove a Confederate statue in the Arlington National Cemetery in compliance to a Congressional mandate.www.foxnews.com
Good.
This monument was directly put up/paid for by the Daughters of the Confederacy, who were basically the female KKK, and dedicated by fucking Woodrow Wilson on Jefferson Davis's birthday.
Good.
This monument was directly put up/paid for by the Daughters of the Confederacy, who were basically the female KKK, and dedicated by fucking Woodrow Wilson on Jefferson Davis's birthday.
Actually the United Daughters of the Confederacy opposed the burial of Confederate dead at Arlington from which the Memorial would later be located (sixteen thousand Confederates are buried at Arlington) but President McKinley, a Union Army veteran and other Veterans groups from both sides of the Civil War thought it'd be a good way to show National Reunification and Reconciliation after Northerners and Southerners fought side by side again in the Spanish-American War, including a former Confederate General Joseph Wheeler leading American troops into battle.
The establishment of the Memorial was done by ACMA several years later for the Confederate section of Arlington, not the United Daughters of the Confederacy though they were part of the umbrella of organizations which again included Veterans groups from North and South as well as gaining financial and moral and political support from Presidents William Taft, Theodore Roosevelt and a leading Catholic philanthropist named Thomas Ryan among many others. This support was again due to the idea of reconciliation and reunification.
"Authorized in March 1906, former Confederate soldier and sculptor Moses Jacob Ezekiel was commissioned by the United Daughters of the Confederacy in November 1910 to design the memorial. It was unveiled by President Woodrow Wilson on June 4, 1914, the 106th anniversary of the birth of Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederate States of America."Actually the United Daughters of the Confederacy opposed the burial of Confederate dead at Arlington from which the Memorial would later be located (sixteen thousand Confederates are buried at Arlington) but President McKinley, a Union Army veteran and other Veterans groups from both sides of the Civil War thought it'd be a good way to show National Reunification and Reconciliation after Northerners and Southerners fought side by side again in the Spanish-American War, including a former Confederate General Joseph Wheeler leading American troops into battle.
The establishment of the Memorial was done by ACMA several years later for the Confederate section of Arlington, not the United Daughters of the Confederacy though they were part of the umbrella of organizations which again included Veterans groups from North and South as well as gaining financial and moral and political support from Presidents William Taft, Theodore Roosevelt and a leading Catholic philanthropist named Thomas Ryan among many others. This support was again due to the idea of reconciliation and reunification.