• The Sietch will be brought offline for HPG systems maintenance tomorrow (Thursday, 2 May 2024). Please remain calm and do not start any interstellar wars while ComStar is busy. May the Peace of Blake be with you. Precentor Dune

2nd Civil War Theorycrafting Thread, Peaches Free

  • Thread starter Deleted member 88
  • Start date

History Learner

Well-known member
Indeed.

Demographic shifts and whatever shenanigans the DNC gets up, will ensure that state of affairs will remain.

Why do you think there is so much effort into turning Texas blue for example?

The democrats have no intention of sharing power once they no longer have to.

May/June was a taste of what a Second ACW would actually be like, rather than a repeat of the first which many seem to assume would be repeated, often along Red/Blue state lines. Problem with that is there is a sliding scale of Red/Blue and, in a general sense, there isn't any such distinctions; Texas is a Red State, but it does have Blue areas like Austin which would undoubtedly side with the opponents of Texas as a whole. Syria and Burma are thus models to look towards, in that you'll have lots of various armed groups, maybe under a general aegis or not, fighting over absolute border gore boundaries of territories. You'll see Right Wing Death Squads in upstate New York, while Antifa Anarcho-Communist factions run rampant in Nashville despite the Tennessee National Guard being on the frontlines as a whole.

As for what I said about May-June of 2020, I think there is a growing realization of just how close that time period really was. The White House was being besieged, while the military effectively announced they were siding with the rioters and wouldn't intervene; Bill Barr literally had to pull BoP personnel out of Texas just to ensure they had loyal cadres to defend critical infrastructure in the Capitol. The Black vans and Federal Agents in Seattle, much bemoaned by Leftist outlets at the time, was much the same story; Barr IIRC had pulled a bunch of BORTAC guys to do that because they simply didn't have anyone else.

Outside the halls of centralized power, as it was, you saw signs bubbling of a general discontent across the country start too. When word was Antifa was going to emerge from Seattle to start targeting nearby suburbs and small towns, you had the incident at Snohomish where hundreds if not thousands of residents organized themselves into ad hoc militia forces to contest such an event. Same thing happened in Florida, where the Sherriff of a county openly endorsed such and noted his residents were arming up to prevent such in their own home areas. Of note, by the way, is that the Sheriffs of both counties were later forced out by State officials which really should say a lot, I think.

In short, the Second Civil War will be everywhere, it will not have neat lines of control or possibly even a clear outbreak point. Most likely you have a contested election or some other event, central control breaks down and you start to see something of a Urban/rural divide form up as the suburbs and rural areas organize militias while gang forces themselves also organize as fighting forces. Forces currently under centralized control would come up for grabs; the official institutions might go one way, but given the rank and file demographics, you'd see a lot of desertion to the other side, up to and possibly including entire units or branches. State forces would mostly go with where the reality of their State is; Boise might go "Left" but the rest of Idaho and the majority of its NG would go "Right"
 
Last edited:

History Learner

Well-known member
And this isn't about the US gov being 'evil' or dooming, it's about recognizing the realities of what modern weaponry in the US arsenal means for any sort of conflict resembling the first ACW, and being willing to admit what a lot of Boogalo peeps don't want to address; if they want to do more than play an eternal game of "Wolverines", that means taking and holding territory with standing forces that cannot just melt away into hideaways. Which means being willing to engage in a stand-up fight against US Federal forces.

Yeah, it's not like the Taliban outlasted the U.S. Armed Forces and then decimated the conventionally equipped and firepower superior ANSDF in the course of roughly five years of combat.

Oh wait...

The Taliban did do all of what you're saying they couldn't do here against the U.S. and its allies, and they won. M1 Abrams don't mean anything when insurgents are destroying bridges, hitting POL or snipping mechanics into the extent they can't be maintained, which is exactly what ended up happening to the Afghan Air Force in 2021. Same with the the general infantry formations; years of attrition builds up as long as the insurgents are committed and eventually it becomes impossible for those vaunted conventional troops, heavily armed, to maintain all ground and eventually they're so exhausted you see them collapse as they did in Kandahar, Herat and even Kabul.
 

TheRomanSlayer

Kayabangan, Dugo, at Dangal
I did write my own scenario about how a Second American Civil War would look like, though I was actually using the Ukrainian Crisis as a template for it, with the premise of the Trump presidency being the catalyst for such a civil war. Now, I might have to write a new kind of scenario for how this will happen.

From what I can guess, Canada would definitely be affected by the civil war across from its border, though we could expect refugees to stream across the border in this case.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Late to the party here and likely not the first to think of it, but I don’t suppose you could end up with military surplus all over the place for the rebels and insurgents to pick up? After all, the US left billions of dollars’ of it in Afghanistan and Vietnam, so even ignoring how heavily armed the general public is as far small arms are concerned, the possibility they’ll have profuse access to military surplus some idiot general(s) forgot to account for seems quite high to me, especially since ACW II would just be chaos all around. :unsure:
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
Late to the party here and likely not the first to think of it, but I don’t suppose you could end up with military surplus all over the place for the rebels and insurgents to pick up? After all, the US left billions of dollars’ of it in Afghanistan and Vietnam, so even ignoring how heavily armed the general public is as far small arms are concerned, the possibility they’ll have profuse access to military surplus some idiot general(s) forgot to account for seems quite high to me, especially since ACW II would just be chaos all around. :unsure:

It's not 'might,' it's 'this is already the case.'

The military sells plenty of surplus material off to the National Guard, and some state National Guards have amounts of military hardware comparable to European nations. And that's stuff like tanks, helicopters, A-10's, and fighter aircraft.

Given the current trajectory of SCOTUS, it's likely fully-automatic small arms, grenades, and relatively cheap artillery pieces will be openly on the civilian market again too.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
It's not 'might,' it's 'this is already the case.'

The military sells plenty of surplus material off to the National Guard, and some state National Guards have amounts of military hardware comparable to European nations. And that's stuff like tanks, helicopters, A-10's, and fighter aircraft.

Given the current trajectory of SCOTUS, it's likely fully-automatic small arms, grenades, and relatively cheap artillery pieces will be openly on the civilian market again too.

Interesting; I don't suppose they've deliberated on any arms-related cases lately? I know they take lots of cases that don't make the headlines all the time, but if they were on the road to legalizing any of the "heavy-duty" stuff you mentioned, odds are that'd create quite the stir.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Not recently but they are looking at it and given the push for more gun control they are paying attention. They did strike down some restrictions a while ago.

Like what? If it’s more “sexy accessories”, that won’t reduce the weaponry gap much. But if it’s the “heavy-duty” stuff @LordsFire mentioned earlier, that’s a different story.
 

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
It's not 'might,' it's 'this is already the case.'

The military sells plenty of surplus material off to the National Guard, and some state National Guards have amounts of military hardware comparable to European nations. And that's stuff like tanks, helicopters, A-10's, and fighter aircraft.

Given the current trajectory of SCOTUS, it's likely fully-automatic small arms, grenades, and relatively cheap artillery pieces will be openly on the civilian market again too.

That is not a bad thing. Never trust the government.
 

SpaceOrbis

Well-known member
Fuck that noise. The divide is cause by many republicans having principles and Democrats being intolerably evil. Trump did not do enough to widen the divide.

We are not too close to a civil war, the opposite really, we are too far away from one. Democrats are allowed use terrorists to influence politics their way every ele3ction cycle, violate nearly every article in the constitution, and murder babies with an efficiency that would make Hitler jealous.

We should have had a civil war as soon as Roe VS Wade dropped. We should have had a civil war when BLM burned down cities with the express approval of Democrats in the legislature. We should have had a civil war when our entire nation was illegal put on lockdown and the fourth amendment was flushed down the toilet.

The only reason that we haven't had a civil war yet is because the Republican leadership is full of cowards and corruption.

I have been away from this site for a awhile and sort of forgot I posted on this thread so I'll cover my thoughts here. Let us cover this bit first.

"The divide is caused by many republicans having principles and Democrats being intolerably evil".

A good joke I found on Facebook goes like this voting is like driving your car you vote R to go backwards and you vote D to go forwards.

My mother and brother are hardcore R voters. They don't give a shit what Trump says. He could kill a baby on live video and I'm 99% sure they would find some messed up way to make that great. But going back to that bit If you think attacking a women's right to her body is good then we can agree to disagree. If you think the right lying to us every day of the week is good we can agree to disagree on that point as well. I have lived under Trump for four damn years. When he was put in office I was willing to give him a few weeks. I didn't think he should've run but he won so I allowed him time to prove his worth. His worth turned out to be less than nothing and anybody who thinks he was a good choice lives under a rock. The guy was a sexist, racist, dimwit and he did nothing but make us a joke.

To be sure I'm sure some on the right are good people. I have yet to hear one that doesn't sound like an utter tool but I'm sure some do exist and if I ever hear them talk I may be willing to give them a vote. I'm not about to say the whole party is in a Trump cult but some are and I'll not act like that fact isn't true. I'll also not act like his base aren't nazis because when you wave a nazi flag around and wear nazi shit and do what the nazis did your a nazi. I would love if that fact wasn't shown to be true every day but it is. So when somebody says that the right are good and the left are bad I have to say you must be living in make believe land because everything you're saying is nothing more than dog droppings.
-
Democrats are allowed use terrorists to influence politics their way every ele3ction cycle, violate nearly every article in the constitution, and murder babies with an efficiency that would make Hitler jealous.

Care to list what parts you think we are violating or should I just put this up to me being a lover of freedom and civil rights? I'm going to guess you think a woman opting out of a pregnancy is murder. Sorry but it isn't and yelling louder doesn't make it true. I have heard more than enough know-nothings yell that and every time I prove them wrong they just yell the lie all the louder. Murder has a use in law and that isn't anywhere in that use. To murder a baby the baby has to be born first. Before that point, there is no baby to kill and thus nobody to kill. I can't say I know what you mean by influencing the way people vote. You go into a room and you vote. Your choice is yours. Nobody can make you vote for anybody but who you want to vote for. This isn't Russian or North Korea. Here people have rights.
-
We should have had a civil war as soon as Roe VS Wade dropped. We should have had a civil war when BLM burned down cities with the express approval of Democrats in the legislature. We should have had a civil war when our entire nation was illegally put on lockdown and the fourth amendment was flushed down the toilet.

Your time in school wasn't great, was it? Even when we were fighting to be free from the king we still did lockdowns. There was nothing illegal about locking down the nation in 2019-2022. Any nation with a bit of sense did so and solved the whole mess in a matter of weeks. It was only the dumbasses here who didn't do the most basic shit that caused it to last for as long as it did and killed as many people as it did.

My mother and brother always had a fit any time they were asked to wear a mask. If a doctor can wear a mask for 12+ hours you can wear a damn mask for five damn minutes while you're out picking up your foodstuff and daily needs. Stop being an oversized baby and do what is asked of you.

I strongly disagree that we should be waging a civil war over Roe V Wade or Covid-19. That would be fucking stupid and solve nothing. As far as the fourth amendment goes this is what that covers.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

What that has to do with Covid-19 I haven't a clue.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
Lmao I made through the second paragraph before deciding to ignore you. Not gonna bother even reading the rest of this shit.

You sound like some of the clowns on AH or SB. "The guy was a sexist, racist, dimwit and he did nothing but make us a joke." Cry about it some more. Go suck Biden's nuts while at it, running some defense of the far worse shit he has done because "muh presidential behaviour" or some bullshit.
 

Battlegrinder

Someday we will win, no matter what it takes.
Moderator
Staff Member
Founder
Obozny
I'll also not act like his base aren't nazis because when you wave a nazi flag around and wear nazi shit and do what the nazis did your a nazi. I would love if that fact wasn't shown to be true every day but it is.

Trump's base are not the people waving around nazi flags or doing what the nazis did. Certainly those people exist, but as a tiny, tiny minority that in no way represents the entire group, anymore than the guys on the left waving around the communist flag and insisting that true communism has never been tried represent the entirety of their base.

But going back to that bit If you think attacking a women's right to her body is good then we can agree to disagree.

That right does not exist, at least not in the unilateral sense you imply ( even Europe, while engaging in their performance little freakout over the end of Roe, doesn't recognize bodily autonomy as a right, abortion is recognized as a mere policy decision).

Murder has a use in law and that isn't anywhere in that use. To murder a baby the baby has to be born first. Before that point, there is no baby to kill and thus nobody to kill.

So, you think if you kill a pregnant women that's nine months in, at the stage where the baby will born at practically any second, that's only one life you've taken, not two? On a philosophical level, that's your belief (I say philosophically because legally, it's a double homicide, not one).

I can't say I know what you mean by influencing the way people vote. You go into a room and you vote. Your choice is yours. Nobody can make you vote for anybody but who you want to vote for. This isn't Russian or North Korea. Here people have rights.

He means intimidation and riots, which will indiscriminately harm everyone to punish them for making the wrong choice. Why did you think major cities boarded up their windows before the 2020 election, did they think the residents of New York were going to riot if Biden won?
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
I have been away from this site for a awhile and sort of forgot I posted on this thread so I'll cover my thoughts here. Let us cover this bit first.

"The divide is caused by many republicans having principles and Democrats being intolerably evil".

A good joke I found on Facebook goes like this voting is like driving your car you vote R to go backwards and you vote D to go forwards.

My mother and brother are hardcore R voters. They don't give a shit what Trump says. He could kill a baby on live video and I'm 99% sure they would find some messed up way to make that great. But going back to that bit If you think attacking a women's right to her body is good then we can agree to disagree. If you think the right lying to us every day of the week is good we can agree to disagree on that point as well. I have lived under Trump for four damn years. When he was put in office I was willing to give him a few weeks. I didn't think he should've run but he won so I allowed him time to prove his worth. His worth turned out to be less than nothing and anybody who thinks he was a good choice lives under a rock. The guy was a sexist, racist, dimwit and he did nothing but make us a joke.

To be sure I'm sure some on the right are good people. I have yet to hear one that doesn't sound like an utter tool but I'm sure some do exist and if I ever hear them talk I may be willing to give them a vote. I'm not about to say the whole party is in a Trump cult but some are and I'll not act like that fact isn't true. I'll also not act like his base aren't nazis because when you wave a nazi flag around and wear nazi shit and do what the nazis did your a nazi. I would love if that fact wasn't shown to be true every day but it is. So when somebody says that the right are good and the left are bad I have to say you must be living in make believe land because everything you're saying is nothing more than dog droppings.
-
Democrats are allowed use terrorists to influence politics their way every ele3ction cycle, violate nearly every article in the constitution, and murder babies with an efficiency that would make Hitler jealous.

Care to list what parts you think we are violating or should I just put this up to me being a lover of freedom and civil rights? I'm going to guess you think a woman opting out of a pregnancy is murder. Sorry but it isn't and yelling louder doesn't make it true. I have heard more than enough know-nothings yell that and every time I prove them wrong they just yell the lie all the louder. Murder has a use in law and that isn't anywhere in that use. To murder a baby the baby has to be born first. Before that point, there is no baby to kill and thus nobody to kill. I can't say I know what you mean by influencing the way people vote. You go into a room and you vote. Your choice is yours. Nobody can make you vote for anybody but who you want to vote for. This isn't Russian or North Korea. Here people have rights.
-
We should have had a civil war as soon as Roe VS Wade dropped. We should have had a civil war when BLM burned down cities with the express approval of Democrats in the legislature. We should have had a civil war when our entire nation was illegally put on lockdown and the fourth amendment was flushed down the toilet.

Your time in school wasn't great, was it? Even when we were fighting to be free from the king we still did lockdowns. There was nothing illegal about locking down the nation in 2019-2022. Any nation with a bit of sense did so and solved the whole mess in a matter of weeks. It was only the dumbasses here who didn't do the most basic shit that caused it to last for as long as it did and killed as many people as it did.

My mother and brother always had a fit any time they were asked to wear a mask. If a doctor can wear a mask for 12+ hours you can wear a damn mask for five damn minutes while you're out picking up your foodstuff and daily needs. Stop being an oversized baby and do what is asked of you.

I strongly disagree that we should be waging a civil war over Roe V Wade or Covid-19. That would be fucking stupid and solve nothing. As far as the fourth amendment goes this is what that covers.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

What that has to do with Covid-19 I haven't a clue.
The only joke here is you and how you actually said this unironically.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Can anyone please tell me what the term "glowie" means? I do know what the term "tankie" means.
Government agents pretending to be members of a group; either in an attempt to rile them up into or frame them for committing violence, but so incompetently that it's obvious who they actually are.

Basically, they're this guy:
4b2.gif

Except they're also trying to get you to shoot up a school.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top