The West getting to field test and perfect their new military hardware against a near-peer opponent is a very good argument for supporting Ukraine from a terrible source (antiwar.com, really, are we supposed to be the hippies now?).
Why would anyone considering themselves a right winger want to cater to this electorate?
Yes, a baptism of fire for modern weapons and tactics is a quite often missed side benefit of western aid in Ukraine, that will pay dividends in future wars.
>provoking superpowers
I wish for a world where the "former and current superpowers" fear provoking the West as much as the author of that video claims to. Luckily the West's weapons getting perfected is a step in that direction.
>repeating fake "deal" with Soviet Union supposedly being broken
There was no deal, and if there was, fuck commies and Russian imperial revanchists equally, it should be broken, repeatedly, every year, just to teach them about "former Soviet Union" not being their personal fiefdom.
>ending the conflict
I love this weasel wording. It's funny that it is only used by people who want it to end in a certain way that they know is not easily defensible if mentioned specifically.
Reminder that Russia can end this conflict on a whim by ordering its armies out of Ukraine at any time.
Also reminder that this video represents a less... stereotypical part of public opinion on the matter, which as surprising amount of controversies, doesn't have 2 sides, but at least 4, sometimes creating great confusion and odd alliances between unusual factions domestic and international.
In regard to supporting Ukraine:
1. It's good for the West and that's a good thing - lots of less ideological libs, centrist establishment and some of conservative right, some far right factions with a more geopolitical outlook.
2. It's good for the West and that's a bad thing - this. Various odd left factions that are "anti war" in exactly the same sense that the hippies of Cold War were always "anti war", specifically against wars that western countries lead against communists and the allies, but obviously never against communists doing wars to extend or protect their power.
3. It's bad for the West and that's a good thing - many left-liberal globalist internationalists.
4. It's bad for the West and that's a bad thing - pro-Russian far right factions deluded about Putin being their friend or something.
Some really hilarious arguments can happen if 2 argue with 4 or 1 argue with 3. Meanwhile 1-2 and 3-4 arguments tend to just be tedious, stereotypical and cause a massive sense of deja vu.