So... Some concrete accusations of abuse have come to light.
US Attorney Opens Investigation Into Arrests
What I want to know is...
-What is CPB doing making non-Immigration related arrests?
-Are the feds really using rental cars instead of unmarked cop cars? I doubt it, but if they are, that seems pretty skeevy.
Where I stand on this is that I want the feds to drop the hammer on Antifa and like-minded groups. I want Portland to be made an example of.
But I am quite convinced that the feds are capable of doing this legally, within the boundaries of their existing jurisdiction. Consider, for example, that many of these rioters have crossed state lines in order to riot. Congratulations. That is a federal offense, and that puts you in the jurisdiction of the big boys.
Frankly, I've heard this "Fight fire with fire" rhetoric before, and I'm not impressed. It's usually spoken by people who've never fought a fire in the first place, and don't realize how incredibly risky and hard to pull off it is.
Ya know, I was going to quote Bacle, but I don't feel like digging through the thread and you'll do just as well.
You're presenting a false dilemma, because there is a middle ground between 'Don't fight back at all' and 'Abandon the Constitution'. And don't pretend that you can go back to constitutional norms after you've shredded them to bits. Look to Cicero. Once you've proven that you will dispense with law and justice for the sake of expedience, nobody will take you seriously when you try to stand on principle again.