How 'bout perpetrating fraud on the American people in order for them to give up more of their liberties?
@Megadeath
-It's what Obama did during his tenure in office regarding Obamacare.
How 'bout conducting a mis-information campaign in order to force the populace to take experimental drugs that are provably harmful in order to gain more power, influence and money?
-It's what Biden & Co have done and are currently doing.
That isn't actually being very specific now, is it? "Perpetrating fraud" how exactly? Which laws were broke, specifically, and by which particular actions? As for the drugs, I can only assume you're talking about the same vaccination trump also pushed/pushes, and that was developed under his administration so I'm not sure how you can argue that's something that makes Biden worse than trump, even if we accept your stupid beliefs as fact.
Clinton had a career-long track-record of sex crimes, including rape accusations, that were completely white-washed and brushed off by the political left. These came to some limited light during the impeachment, but the media went to bat for him, and would never have released the Lewinsky story if Matt Drudge hadn't broken it on the internet.
Obama administration scandals:
1. Fast and Furious armed cartels, some of these arms eventually were used to kill Americans.
2. Lois Lerner IRS tax persecution scandal. Blatant weaponization of the government against political opponents.
3. The Ben-Ghazi scandal. Both Obama and Hillary knowingly lied to the American public about this.
4. The entire Iran deal.
That's just off the top of my head. It also should be considered a scandal when Obama ordered production of the F-22 to stop, even though that was within his technical legal authority.
Yep, Clinton had sex problems. But, a) So did trump and b) Neither of their sex crimes real or imagined are significant against the major charges here.
As for the Obama issues:
1. Yep, US governments always seem to be involved with various shady organisations, and often times that comes back around and bites them. But it's both common, and very limited in the damage it can do to America as a country.
2. Lois Lerner isn't actually Obama.
3. Politicians lie to the American people. Also, water is wet and the sky is blue. It can even at times be the morally right thing to do. It certainly isn't a crime though under most circumstances.
4. The Iran deal, what exactly? Beyond trump's insistence it was bad I mean?
Bonus round; the F-22 is one if not
the best planes in the world. It's fantastic, and god I'm glad America has it. Even just working off publicly available information though, it's reasonable that it was discontinued. The f-35 is close enough, or more importantly better enough than everyone else's fighter's. It's also cheaper, and much better designed to accommodate improvements over it's service life. We're also already hearing the first publicly available information about successor programs, and several new and maturing technologies are likely to change the paradigm of future air warfare so significantly that heavy investment in the extra edge the f-22 gives now is irrelevant. American air power is more than good enough if a shooting war kicks off with China tomorrow. If it happens on a more plausible time frame, newer and even better stuff is coming down thr pipeline. I won't say that discontinuing it was definitely the best choice, but like I say, even with just what's widely known, it hardly seems to rise to the level of a scandal. Considering all the development and knowledge we are not privy to, the case is presumably even stronger.
Regardless... You're talking about scandals when we're discussing concrete and demonstrable serious crimes trump has committed. I don't really give that much of a shit if the saxophone player can't keep it in his pants, beyond not really liking him as a person for it. I don't like American involvement with cartels and even sometimes terrorists, but I do accept that sometimes it can seem like the right idea at the time. I'm no moral absolutist, and I'm quite prepared to accept working with the lesser of two evils to prevent a worse one, and I acknowledge that hindsight will sometimes show that a choice wasn't right. That can call for examination to make sure what was known when and by who, and if they made a good choice with that information. When not, there should indeed be some consequences. Regardless... Nothing you've said is even vaguely comparable in a legal sense to stealing government secrets, lying about it and hiding them from the government whilst flaunting them to random members of the public, nor to attempts to undermine the basis of american democracy and the transfer of administrational power.
