So he posted this:
The key point is that "Twitter cannot become a free for all hellscape, where anything can be said with no consequences. In addition to adhering to the laws of the land, our platform must be warm and welcoming to all, where you can choose your desired experience according to your preferences, just as you can choose, for example, to see movies or play video games ranging from all ages to mature."
My guess is that it means something like a person can choose what level of political discourse they want to view, but not necessarily what level they want to be viewed at (some algorithm does that is my bet).
The key point is that "Twitter cannot become a free for all hellscape, where anything can be said with no consequences. In addition to adhering to the laws of the land, our platform must be warm and welcoming to all, where you can choose your desired experience according to your preferences, just as you can choose, for example, to see movies or play video games ranging from all ages to mature."
My guess is that it means something like a person can choose what level of political discourse they want to view, but not necessarily what level they want to be viewed at (some algorithm does that is my bet).