Musk actually buys Twitter.

[Zachowon]

In my case it's more because I'm known to generally be one of the minority of liberals on this forum, so certain members basically replace what I actually say with "liberal strawman of the day", and/or assume anything I say that isn't "liberal strawman" is some sort of bad faith sneakyness.

For some, not me just what I get from others, you are seen as someone who is the anti thesis of what most on here believe, and what you did on prior forums has given people bad taste and the do not trust you do to that.

But I personally have no issue with anyone on this board so.
Just trying ti help clear the air

 

[LordSunhawk]

Consider this an official Boot warning to both of you to cut it out, if this derail continues the Boot will start stomping.

 

[Terthna]

Consider this an official Boot warning to both of you to cut it out, if this derail continues the Boot will start stomping.

And if you feel you absolutely must keep going, you can take it to the Sietch Affairs Commentary Thread; where I'm fairly certain it would be on topic.

 

[Sergeant Foley]

Blanket Amnesty…does that mean Alex Jones might yet be unleashed on Twitter once more?

I’m not a massive fan of the man but I can’t deny he is entertaining.

Sure sounds like it.

 

[ShadowArxxy]

Sure sounds like it.

Nope. Elon later stated that he is specifically never, ever unbanning Alex Jones regardless of any amnesty.

 

[Bacle]

 

[mrttao]

where is the threatening tweet to which he replied? I am curious to see it.
that said. being banned for cuss words is bullshit

 

[Bacle]

where is the threatening tweet to which he replied? I am curious to see it.
that said. being banned for cuss words is bullshit

The quoted Tweet in the bottom part of that is what caused the ban; telling someone to 'suck my balls' counts as 'targeted harassment' under whatever mod made that decision.

 

[mrttao]

The quoted Tweet in the bottom part of that is what caused the ban; telling someone to 'suck my balls' counts as 'targeted harassment' under whatever mod made that decision.

I got that part. however

Update: The permanent suspension was a result of
@oilfield_rando
’s response to a user threatening him in a previous tweet

suck my balls was supposedly a reply to being threatened.

as in
> matthew: Threatens @oilfield_rando
> oilfield_rando: suck my balls, matthew
> twitter: oilfield_rando has been banned for targetted harassment of matthew

I want to see what matthew said.

 

[Sobek]

 

[Sergeant Foley]

I got that part. however

suck my balls was supposedly a reply to being threatened.

as in
> matthew: Threatens @oilfield_rando
> oilfield_rando: suck my balls, matthew
> twitter: oilfield_rando has been banned for targetted harassment of matthew

I want to see what matthew said.

WOW!

 

[Bacle]

Elon's officially on the WEF shitlist.

 

[LordsFire]

Elon's officially on the WEF shitlist.

Such an enemy speaks well of his character.

 

[Jormungandr]

I'm sure Musk is crying his eyes out at his bunk at Twitter HQ at being essentially labeled persona non grata by a bunch of globalist, authoritarian thugs.

Oh, the humanity!

 

[Bacle]

 

[Bear Ribs]

This is one of the more surreal headlines I've seen. Musk is being sued for not paying lawyers who sued him, for suing him.

Twitter hired experts for case against Musk—now Musk won’t pay them, lawsuit says

Company says it wasn't paid for work on lawsuit that forced Musk to complete merger.

arstechnica.com

 

[Cherico]

This is one of the more surreal headlines I've seen. Musk is being sued for not paying lawyers who sued him, for suing him.

Twitter hired experts for case against Musk—now Musk won’t pay them, lawsuit says

Company says it wasn't paid for work on lawsuit that forced Musk to complete merger.

arstechnica.com

Chutspah in action people.

 

[strunkenwhite]

Chutspah in action people.

Musk's, you mean? Change in ownership doesn't invalidate pay owed for work just because the new owner doesn't like the work in question.

Disclaimer: working just off the headline

 

[Hlaalu Agent]

Musk's, you mean? Change in ownership doesn't invalidate pay owed for work just because the new owner doesn't like the work in question.

Disclaimer: working just off the headline

As far as I know, this seems to be the case. So I'd actually agree with you.

Though, I'd very much like to see how he gets out of this or not. It will be a show, no matter what.

 

[ShadowArxxy]

Musk has apparently been extremely aggressive in slashing Twitter expenses by refusing to pay for a lot of things where he thinks they won't actually call his bluff and/or he can argue contract technicalities.