United States Biden administration policies and actions - megathread

Hey, I wonder how many of them are like "WTF was I thinking?" No...that would take intellectual honesty. Forget I asked that.

Normies and independents are hopefully swinging to the "Biden is incompetent" camp. The Democrats are seeing diminishing returns anyway. Why do you think they are trying to take control of all elections with HR-1 and other such measures? So they can cheat their way to a one party state.
 
Normies and independents are hopefully swinging to the "Biden is incompetent" camp. The Democrats are seeing diminishing returns anyway. Why do you think they are trying to take control of all elections with HR-1 and other such measures? So they can cheat their way to a one party state.


Trying to hold onto power at all costs normally ends much worse then losing an election and retooling for a couple years.
 
Trying to hold onto power at all costs normally ends much worse then losing an election and retooling for a couple years.
Normally, but the US has gotten to the point that the global order is breaking down thanks to the rise of China and the world no longer trusts us. The globalists that set US policy are freaking out about losing their power and influence, so they think they have to take more direct control to prevent their project from collapsing and the world reverting to a true multi-polar system like before WW1. Assuming they're being honest they claim to be fearful of a return to the era of world wars and inability to act when things like climate change are going to get increasingly bad (the Pentagon has said water wars are our future), which would be worse than letting nature take its course politically in the US.
 
Normies and independents are hopefully swinging to the "Biden is incompetent" camp. The Democrats are seeing diminishing returns anyway. Why do you think they are trying to take control of all elections with HR-1 and other such measures? So they can cheat their way to a one party state.

Given that his poll numbers were dropping even before the crisis unfolded, I'd say yes.

Trying to hold onto power at all costs normally ends much worse then losing an election and retooling for a couple years.

Don't get me wrong, HR 1 is an absolute disaster and so is HR 4. But I'd also note that applies to Trump after December and the electoral vote. And that's why I'm pissed off at the whole circular firing squad he's trying to do in 2022, because that would be the one thing that could help the Democrats hold onto their majority even in the wake of all this.
 
Indeed they are losing it. But lets remember this downloaded for the future.



Show Future Generations The Dancing Fools so that they can learn from their folly.


These are the same idiots who danced and celebrated, or would have with the election of their “messiah” Obama back in 2008 and 2012. So no surprise. Triumph of the Will, anyone?

And while that may sound extreme, show me one instance, in the last century or two anyway, how turning a political leader regardless of the ideology into an object of worship typically worked out.
 
These are the same idiots who danced and celebrated, or would have with the election of their “messiah” Obama back in 2008 and 2012. So no surprise. Triumph of the Will, anyone?

And while that may sound extreme, show me one instance, in the last century or two anyway, how turning a political leader regardless of the ideology into an object of worship typically worked out.

Agustus ceasar.

In the last century or two, Ataturk is probally the nicest and even he had to do some serious shit to turn the disaster that was the rump of the former ottoman empire into a functional secular country.
 
Malthus is always wrong.

Yeah, humans are inordinately adaptive. On the other hand, the Pentagon kind of has to go with what the politicians say.

These are the same idiots who danced and celebrated, or would have with the election of their “messiah” Obama back in 2008 and 2012. So no surprise. Triumph of the Will, anyone?

And while that may sound extreme, show me one instance, in the last century or two anyway, how turning a political leader regardless of the ideology into an object of worship typically worked out.

George Washington says hi. Also that he disapproves of such nonsense.

Seriously. It takes a LOT of character to do that and not give in to temptation. Very few people are able to do that because it requires an ego to be a leader but also an inordinate amount of self control and humility.
 
Oh look another person who doesn't know history.

Malthus was only incorrect about the role technology has been able to play in delaying the problem, but remember history is not at an end and just because we haven't hit the limit yet doesn't mean it won't eventually be reached.

Malthus was incorrect that growth of population would trap lower social classes in perpetual material misery, and every prognosticator after him who has predicted societal collapse because of overpopulation has also been wrong.

That civilizations have failed for other reasons does not make Malthus right.
 
That the CIA, not the Defense Department or the 'diplomats' at State, was selected to go negotiate with the Taliban. That says all you need to know about what the Taliban is and where they get their support.

...probably so they can also arrange the opium trade. $5 says 10% goes to them.
 
Oh look another person who doesn't know history.

Malthus was only incorrect about the role technology has been able to play in delaying the problem, but remember history is not at an end and just because we haven't hit the limit yet doesn't mean it won't eventually be reached.
Malthus was incorrect that growth of population would trap lower social classes in perpetual material misery, and every prognosticator after him who has predicted societal collapse because of overpopulation has also been wrong.

That civilizations have failed for other reasons does not make Malthus right.
Malthus's time didn't have a space program.

'Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me.' and 'So Say We All' are humanities likely futures, if Yellowstone or an asteroid doesn't wipe us out first.
 
Malthus was incorrect that growth of population would trap lower social classes in perpetual material misery, and every prognosticator after him who has predicted societal collapse because of overpopulation has also been wrong.

That civilizations have failed for other reasons does not make Malthus right.
The global lower classes have been trapped in perpetual material misery. Slavery exists in all but name in many places around the world. Just because you don't see it in your backyard doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

As to society collapse due to overpopulation, did you not pay attention to the Syrian civil war and its root cause in water shortages or the Arab Spring in general? Destruction of the environment in South America and Africa are pretty catastrophic and populations are only sustained thanks to imports from the developed world:

Maybe there is a technological solution to stave things off even more, but nothing is guaranteed.

Just because the US media doesn't talk about it doesn't mean it isn't happening.
 
The global lower classes have been trapped in perpetual material misery. Slavery exists in all but name in many places around the world. Just because you don't see it in your backyard doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

As to society collapse due to overpopulation, did you not pay attention to the Syrian civil war and its root cause in water shortages or the Arab Spring in general? Destruction of the environment in South America and Africa are pretty catastrophic and populations are only sustained thanks to imports from the developed world:

Maybe there is a technological solution to stave things off even more, but nothing is guaranteed.

Just because the US media doesn't talk about it doesn't mean it isn't happening.
Pretty sure the whole thing in the Middle East came down to Obama making a mess of things. The rest certainly didn’t help but they’re overhyped.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top