Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

[Zachowon]

It's not overly emotional crocodile tear shedding. We see subhuman behavior and this stuff never stops at just animals they go for humans also as this example shows. This guy probably went into the Russian Army so he could legally kill people.

As for your fox hunt whataboutism yes it is subhuman behavior to hunt an animal that can't fight back and not use the animal for anything no meat or fur or anything. Sport hunting is only acceptable if the people who are hunting are going against a dangerous animal that tests their skills and they are in danger also.

And again Chinese can eat dogs it's weird to us Europeans but animals can be eaten or used for human convienance it's only subhuman to eat humans. All other animals can be eaten.
But being especially cruel by going out of your way to cause more suffering than is neccesary or expedient makes you scum.

It isn't Russian Army.
It is Vagner. The PMCs.
This is from the Neo Nazi group that starts with an R

 

[Carrot of Truth]

It's not overly emotional crocodile tear shedding. We see subhuman behavior and this stuff never stops at just animals they go for humans also as this example shows. This guy probably went into the Russian Army so he could legally kill people.

As for your fox hunt whataboutism yes it is subhuman behavior to hunt an animal that can't fight back and not use the animal for anything no meat or fur or anything. Sport hunting is only acceptable if the people who are hunting are going against a dangerous animal that tests their skills and they are in danger also.

And again Chinese can eat dogs it's weird to us Europeans but animals can be eaten or used for human convienance it's only subhuman to eat humans. All other animals can be eaten.
But being especially cruel by going out of your way to cause more suffering than is neccesary or expedient makes you scum.

The Chinese eat dog because China is a backwards shithole. Seriously anyplace where eating dogs and cats is normal can be considered a third world shithole.

 

[Zachowon]

The Chinese eat dog because China is a backwards shithole. Seriously anyplace where eating dogs and cats is normal can be considered a third world shithole.

Yes and no.
In South Korea it is still eaten and sold in a small minority. Basically gotta find the places and be willing to try it.
Not wide spread and often looked down upon

 

[Carrot of Truth]

Yes and no.
In South Korea it is still eaten and sold in a small minority. Basically gotta find the places and be willing to try it.
Not wide spread and often looked down upon

Bunch of backwards savages. I can understand eating dogs and cats in a famine but otherwise it's a sign of a shithole society.

 

[Lord Sovereign]

Bunch of backwards savages. I can understand eating dogs and cats in a famine but otherwise it's a sign of a shithole society.

I could barely imagine slaying and eating so pure and dear a companion as a good boy. Having been around dogs all my life, it turns my stomach inside out.

 

[Carrot of Truth]

I could barely imagine slaying and eating so pure and dear a companion as a good boy. Having been around dogs all my life, it turns my stomach inside out.

If it's a life or death situation then you do what you gotta do.

 

[Culsu]

Wasn't part of the leaks the revelation that the Russians were operating at a 7:1 kill ratio, ie. 7 killed Ukrainians for every killed Russian? At this point I'm no longer believing anything from anyone.

 

[paulobrito]

Wasn't part of the leaks the revelation that the Russians were operating at a 7:1 kill ratio, ie. 7 killed Ukrainians for every killed Russian? At this point I'm no longer believing anything from anyone.

Both sides lie a lot. Add propaganda, the fog of war, and information war and you get the current situation. Is going to be decades before an honest-ish image surfaces.

 

[Lord Sovereign]

Wasn't part of the leaks the revelation that the Russians were operating at a 7:1 kill ratio, ie. 7 killed Ukrainians for every killed Russian? At this point I'm no longer believing anything from anyone.

…I’m starting to wonder whether or not these “leaks” were tactical.

 

[Agent23]

It's not overly emotional crocodile tear shedding. We see subhuman behavior and this stuff never stops at just animals they go for humans also as this example shows. This guy probably went into the Russian Army so he could legally kill people.

If he was and this is not just more NAFO bullshit, he is not the first person to join a military to kill people.
And the Russian military will be far from the first military to accept people such as him.

So, yeah, crocodile tears shed on the basis of more suspicious NAFO agitprop to generate more of a response in the weak-willed and weak-minded parts of the public.

As for your fox hunt whataboutism yes it is subhuman behavior to hunt an animal that can't fight back and not use the animal for anything no meat or fur or anything. Sport hunting is only acceptable if the people who are hunting are going against a dangerous animal that tests their skills and they are in danger also.

The foxes in the UK actually serve a purpose in keeping the rabbit population down, only reason I know about it is because a friend was bitching about rabbits being everywhere. 😂
So from the standpoint of utility this mutt you are obsessing over has even less utility than the British foxes.
If it survives it would probably be a feral pest spreading Cestoda, other types of worms and lice and other diseases everywhere.
Mutts without owners are just vermin, unlike cats and foxes they have no rodent population to control.

And again Chinese can eat dogs it's weird to us Europeans but animals can be eaten or used for human convienance it's only subhuman to eat humans. All other animals can be eaten.
But being especially cruel by going out of your way to cause more suffering than is neccesary or expedient makes you scum.

Those are all PETA level arguments right there.

it is an animal, it is not conscious, or self-aware or intelligent and whining about it in a thread that is supposedly about a war between humans is pointless virtue signalling.

 

[Agent23]

I could barely imagine slaying and eating so pure and dear a companion as a good boy. Having been around dogs all my life, it turns my stomach inside out.

Having being bitten by a feral mutt, knowing people who have been attacked by feral mutts and knowing stories of feral mutts murdering people and eating them I beg to differ.

Dogs are vermin, any mutt that is not on a leash should be terminated on sight with a large caliber round straight to the head.

Eating vermin, even though they are unhealthy, is not that bad a thing.

 

[paulobrito]

Oh please, restaurants - in particular, fair restaurants - serve you cat for rabbit and dog for goatling time and time again all around the world.
Is how the world is.

 

[Captain X]

1) I fucking hate dogs.
2) This is just pointless, overly emotional crocodile tear shedding reminiscent of the standard leftoid/SJW shit we all should know and hate.
Then again, this place is heavily infested with what I love to call SJW classic.
3) During fox hunts, are the foxes cooked and eaten after? What about other types of hunting done purely for sport?
4) The Chinese, Koreans and other canine cuisine connoisseurs can eat all the dogs they want, hell if they come to my town I'd help them track every single street mutt and point them towards the residences of the owners of several particularly annoying owned mutts. While I doubt the quality and efficiency of their choice, mainly because using a carnivore as a meat animal is inefficient when you have cows, chickens and pigs, and I doubt that a walking parasite dispenser is very healty and tasty to eat, it is their problem, not mine.Animals have no rights, and anyone who claims otherwise is as nuts as PETA.

I'm curious, if I called you a dog-eater, would you consider it an insult?

 

[Agent23]

I'm curious, if I called you a dog-eater, would you consider it an insult?

I don't eat trash and tapeworms.

We did sacrifice dogs for religious and divination purposes, but we didn't eat them.

Paganism was closely connected with the old clan system,[160] and the remains of totemism and shamanism were preserved even after the crossing of Danube.[151][161] The Shumen plate in the archaeological literature is often associated with shamanism.[154] In the 9th century, it was recorded that before a battle the Bulgars "used to practice enchantments and jests and charms and certain auguries".[162][163] Liutprand of Cremona reported that Baian, son of Simeon I (893–927), could through magicam transform into a wolf.[153] Clement of Ohrid reported the worship of fire and water by the Bulgars,[164] while in the 11th century Theophylact of Ohrid remembered that before the Christianization the Bulgars respected the Sun, Moon and the stars, and sacrificed dogs to them.[165]

Allegedly, the Dulo clan had the dog as its sacred animal. To this today Bulgarians still use the expression "he kills the dog" to mean "he gives the orders", a relic of the time when the Dulo Khan sacrificed a dog to the deity Tangra.[151]

Sacred animal, pffttt...the Duo clan came from the Ashina clan(as mostly anything prominent in Asia including Genghis Khan and Attila who was allegedly a distant ancestor to the Bulgars) the Ashina clan is mythologically descended from Blue Shapeshifting Wolves and there are many people who have the family name Valkov, aka Wolf around here, similarly the name of Khan Kubrat who was the leader of the Old Great Protobulgaria that existed with its capitol on the Crimea comes from Kurt which means wolf.(On the other hand one theory about naming postulates that the Bulgars might have gotten their name from a type of huge Siberian beaver or other similar animal, no idea if belka translated to beaver exactly or if it was a belka to begin with.)

Oh please, restaurants - in particular, fair restaurants - serve you cat for rabbit and dog for goatling time and time again all around the world.
Is how the world is.

Probably, I mean with enough processing, read pulverization/chopping/boiling even tapeworms might become safe to eat.

In fact I recall one friend mentioning that a guy he knew that worked in this Doner chain said that there were actual worms in the meat tornado and that people who worked there, even the people who owned the place, steered clear from eating there.

Funny enough I think we had a fairly tale where a dog was served in place of goatling.

 

[LordsFire]

Wasn't part of the leaks the revelation that the Russians were operating at a 7:1 kill ratio, ie. 7 killed Ukrainians for every killed Russian? At this point I'm no longer believing anything from anyone.

If this was true, the Russians would still be advancing steadily, not alternating between 'barely better than a stalemate' and 'losing huge chunks of territory.'

If a smaller nation is losing on attrition that badly, it's not going to be able to hold ground, not for any real duration anyways.

 

[Agent23]

If this was true, the Russians would still be advancing steadily, not alternating between 'barely better than a stalemate' and 'losing huge chunks of territory.'

If a smaller nation is losing on attrition that badly, it's not going to be able to hold ground, not for any real duration anyways.

Yeah, cause "not a stap backwards" was a very good strategy for some previous conquerors that tried to attack Russia and the Russians remember...

The idea is to overstretch and kill the enemy fighting force, ground can be taken or lost, but that is secondary.

What has to happen is to make an enemy incapable to fight.

Which means, taking out the enemy army, demoralizing the enemy troops and taking out war making potential.

 

[King Arts]

Bunch of backwards savages. I can understand eating dogs and cats in a famine but otherwise it's a sign of a shithole society.

This I have to disagree with. This argument is either sjwism or cultural chavunism. Why apply this to dogs but not pigs? Muslims will call you a backwards dog fucking savage and remind you that pigs eat their own poop. Your argument is not based on logic, if a practice is truly bad for society then it will either end the society or the society will stop doing it.

Having being bitten by a feral mutt, knowing people who have been attacked by feral mutts and knowing stories of feral mutts murdering people and eating them I beg to differ.

Dogs are vermin, any mutt that is not on a leash should be terminated on sight with a large caliber round straight to the head.

Eating vermin, even though they are unhealthy, is not that bad a thing.

You are a Bulgarian Turk right? Are you Muslim by chance, they also dislike dogs.

 

[Lord Sovereign]

Yeah, cause "not a stap backwards" was a very good strategy for some previous conquerors that tried to attack Russia and the Russians remember...

The idea is to overstretch and kill the enemy fighting force, ground can be taken or lost, but that is secondary.

What has to happen is to make an enemy incapable to fight.

Which means, taking out the enemy army, demoralizing the enemy troops and taking out war making potential.

Jesus titty fucking Christ, why on Earth do you still believe this is going to plan for Russia in any way?

I've said it before, but I'd seriously start questioning the validity of my sources if they'd been so consistently wrong for a year straight by now.

 

[Agent23]

Jesus titty fucking Christ, why on Earth do you still believe this is going to plan for Russia in any way?

I've said it before, but I'd seriously start questioning the validity of my sources if they'd been so consistently wrong for a year straight by now.

You mean like the source that said the Russians had a quarter of a million casualties?

The one the current leaks are showing to be blatantly false, and the Kiev Independent, and dozens of other sources before?

 

[Bacle]

Wasn't part of the leaks the revelation that the Russians were operating at a 7:1 kill ratio, ie. 7 killed Ukrainians for every killed Russian? At this point I'm no longer believing anything from anyone.

I didn't see that anywhere in the doc's I saw; was more like a 1:2 kill ratio for Ukraine, or at least a general casualty exchange rate of that sort. Definitely didn't see any 7:1 ratio for anything in it.

I think part of it is Ukraine is able to save a lot of their wounded and get some of them back in action thanks to western medical tech, where as most wounded Russian's expire or are permanently disabled when wounded.

The only way I believe the 7:1 is if Ukrainian civie casualties are added it; then I could see it being 7:1, because of how many strikes on civie targets the Russians have carried out.

If this was true, the Russians would still be advancing steadily, not alternating between 'barely better than a stalemate' and 'losing huge chunks of territory.'

If a smaller nation is losing on attrition that badly, it's not going to be able to hold ground, not for any real duration anyways.

Yeah, this.

If Ukraine was actually losing troops at a 7:1 ratio to Russia, Russia wouldn't be struggling like they have been shown.