Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

Agent23 said:
This would be revenge for what they did back then.
I'd gladly join forces with anything that helps us give those treacherous, backstabbing scumbags what they deserve.
Even if it is a bunch of Plague marines, or the Flood.
Click to expand...

Flood would eat you,but Chaos marines are like Putin,they would enslave you.Problem with Putin - his army could fight only womans and children,so he would not help you.
In other worlds,you backed genocider for nothing.

Chiron said:
Retired Operations Officer Tyler Weaver aka Armchair Warlord lays out the reality that Jennifer Cafarella is unable to grasp with her cope maps.







Bridge Networks go boom if and when Russia decides.



And Russia has decided Comrades.



Scott Ritter lays out the reality.



Its been well established for weeks now that Ukraine killed those folks, primarily collaborators with Russians and blamed Russia for it and OSINT and MSM repeated it only to get debunked by actual investigators on alternative platforms where the masses have turned to these days.

I and others also pointed it out.

Ukraine killed those people, end of story.

Edit: Seems telegram functions are not working properly at the moment in the coding, or its just my monitor and connection.
Click to expand...


So:
1.kgbstan is taking land.Good for them - but,why they do not win yet? it is 58 day.

2.Izium liberated...from ukrainians? are you feeling well? according to your logic,if somebody take your money he would liberate it,too.
And Great patriotic war? what is it? - there was only WW2,and soviets entered it when they backstabbed Poland and help their Hitler ally.
How soviets could liberate world from nazis,if they were their allies ?

3.kgbstan could destroy bridges.Maybe,but why they do not destroy them arleady?

4.You say,reality.The same reality,when Ukraine must be denazified in two weeks? or maybe this in which Kiev was captured? or Marjupol? Or maybe realisty,in which Moscov do not sunked ?
sadly for you,you are backing stupid genociders who could rape and steal,but not fight normal army.

5.Bucha was made by ukrainians? really? then why germans,who are kgbstan allies,do not claimed that? answer is - becouse they have satellite images from town,with bodies there during putin occupation.

Your problem is - you are using sralin-like putin propagands.And sralin could win thanks to Lend-lease and USA giving him Europe for free.Then everybody who do not want to go to massgrave/gulag must cry how much they love sralin.I do not blame them,i would do the same.

putin - he is raping,murdering and stealing,but is unable to win millitary.His only options are either use nukes,or mobilize millions and send them in wave attack.

With what he have now,he would only capture Marjunpol.After few months ,or maybe year.And then you would claim,that everybody else was feint.
 
BlackDragon98 said:
Ukrainian cruiser Ukraina - Wikipedia

when are the ukrops going to scuttle this one?

Because otherwise the Russkies will take it.
Click to expand...

Ukraina is, at best, 95% complete and minimally maintained in his original 1983 configuration. There's a reason Ukraine never finished him for themselves, *nor* did Russia buy him despite several serious considerations back when the two countries had friendlier relations in the past.

They'll have Admiral Never actually done with his "refit" long before a captured Ukraina could possibly be completed to any sort of use.
 
Last edited:
Carrot of Truth said:
That would be pretty bold considering they can't even defeat Ukraine in a conventional conflict.
Click to expand...

Ukraine is collapsing any day now.

After that.... basically Warsaw in a week.

Berlin in a month.

May I remind you of what MARINE VETERAN Scott Ritter said only back in January?

First Off... Ukraine's destruction in a month is basically guaranteed.

Scott Ritter said:
First and foremost, if it comes to it, when Russia decides to move on Ukraine, it will do so with a plan of action that has been well-thought out and which sufficient resources have been allocated for its successful completion. Russia will not get involved in a military misadventure in Ukraine that has the potential of dragging on and on, like the U.S. experience in Afghanistan and Iraq. Russia has studied an earlier U.S. military campaign—Operation Desert Storm, of Gulf War I—and has taken to heart the lessons of that conflict.

Given the overwhelming supremacy Russia has both in terms of the ability to project air power backed by precision missile attacks, a strategic air campaign against Ukraine would accomplish in days what the U.S. took more than a month to do against Iraq in 1991.

On the ground, the destruction of Ukraine’s Army is all but guaranteed. Simply put, the Ukrainian military is neither equipped nor trained to engage in large-scale ground combat. It would be destroyed piecemeal, and the Russians would more than likely spend more time processing Ukrainian prisoners of war than killing Ukrainian defenders.
Click to expand...

Now your probably saying... what could NATO do against this? Very little I'm afraid. NATO wouldn't even be able to build up forces on the borders without Russia doing this because Ukraine is going to fall so fast.

Scott Ritter said:
If the U.S. tries to build up NATO forces on Russia’s western frontiers in the aftermath of any Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russia will then present Europe with a fait accompli in the form of what would now be known as the “Ukrainian model.” In short, Russia will guarantee that the Ukrainian treatment will be applied to the Baltics, Poland, and even Finland, should it be foolish enough to pursue NATO membership.

Russia won’t wait until the U.S. has had time to accumulate sufficient military power, either. Russia will simply destroy the offending party through the combination of an air campaign designed to degrade the economic function of the targeted nation, and a ground campaign designed to annihilate the ability to wage war. Russia does not need to occupy the territory of NATO for any lengthy period—just enough to destroy whatever military power has been accumulated by NATO near its borders.

And—here’s the kicker—short of employing nuclear weapons, there’s nothing NATO can do to prevent this outcome. Militarily, NATO is but a shadow of its former self. The once great armies of Europe have had to cannibalize their combat formations to assemble battalion-sized “combat groups” in the Baltics and Poland. Russia, on the other hand, has reconstituted two army-size formations—the 1st Guards Tank Army and the 20th Combined Arms Army—from the Cold War-era which specialize in deep offensive military action.
Click to expand...

The 1st Guards Tank Army and 20th Combined Arms Army alone would devastate all NATO (and Finland if they're so foolish to think of joining NATO) formations before the United States or anyone could stop them.

Also keep in mind, Poland's Armed Forces won't be able to resist a Russian invasion for more than a week. Don't even mention a month lol.

National Interest said:
They include modern T-90 tanks, T-72B3M tanks, BTR-82 armored personnel carriers, BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicles along with sophisticated anti-air defenses, such as the Tanguska, Pantsir S, and S-400. They would presently easily overwhelm Polish and Baltic NATO units unless the United States and other allies beef up their troop commitments.

In addition to Russia’s military buildup on its own territory, it has worked with neighboring Belarus to enhance its capability of denying access to NATO aircraft both over its territory and in Poland with S-400 batteries.

By the fifth day of the mock conflict, Russian troops had reached the Polish defensive line along the Vistula River, while fighting to take Warsaw. Poland’s navy and air force faced complete obliteration and ceased to exist. Front-line Polish army units faced the loss of between 60 and 80 percent of their equipment. Russia obtained complete victory within five days.
Click to expand...
 
Carrot of Truth said:
Yeah no need to link the F-22 raptor that was a result of 80's tech and until very recently the US was still flying loads of F-16's and F-18's which were came into existence in the 70's.
Click to expand...
Only first flew in the late 1990s though. Sure the US is flying them and could probably turn them out more rapidly than the F-22, but probably not nearly quickly enough to keep up with losses in a high intensity conflict.
 
sillygoose said:
Only first flew in the late 1990s though. Sure the US is flying them and could probably turn them out more rapidly than the F-22, but probably not nearly quickly enough to keep up with losses in a high intensity conflict.
Click to expand...

Well yeah any conflict that is high intensity for the US is likely about to go nuclear.
 
Captain X said:
I have to admit, I'm getting a bit worried that the Russians are going to set off a nuke in Ukraine and then try to claim the US framed them.
Click to expand...
That's very hard to pull off, because every reactor produces it's own unique signature on the fissile material it produces for weapons, and international monitors could tell pretty fast if a weapon came from Russia or the US as soon as they get any samples.
 
ATP said:
And i am sure of that.Kgbstan always accused others of their own dark deeds.
Click to expand...
Considering all the State Dept scum have been pushing the idea that Russia will try to use a tac nuke and is losing, and that the Russians are saying this is a false flag prep, like what a lot of NATO/US lackeys have been doing in Syria,and how virtually all WMD claims made by the USA have proven to be bullshit, well, I will not be holding my breath.
 
Captain X said:
I have to admit, I'm getting a bit worried that the Russians are going to set off a nuke in Ukraine and then try to claim the US framed them.
Click to expand...

Your nation has the history of false flags since the beginning of the previous century.

https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf

This was the most notable.

So maybe you should look at the degenerate mummified potato you have in Washington and his puppetteers than Moscow.
 
Captain X said:
I have to admit, I'm getting a bit worried that the Russians are going to set off a nuke in Ukraine and then try to claim the US framed them.
Click to expand...
They might, but nukes are very easily traced back to their country of origin so nobody in the world other then their own people would believe it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top