Hell even in MI I have a left leaning SGT and he is comepltly against communism.
Communism is not thing people like in the US military in general.
Communism is not thing people like in the US military in general.
D
Deleted member 88
Guest
The communists of a century ago actually put their money where their mouth was. And were willing to suffer privation, imprisonment, and death for their cause.
Their successors do not seem to be made of the same stuff.
Their successors do not seem to be made of the same stuff.
Mainky because they see it as "I get free stuff and dint have to work!"
The AK is literally built to be idiot proof, their so simple that children can use them and maintain them and they have. They have been buried in mud cleaned and then shot. The online communists could keep their AK working because if a child soilger with no training can do it so can they.
The bigger issue is that most of them will have no idea how to aim the damn thing.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
D
Deleted member 88
Guest
Oh definitely.
I can see political re-education being very much a thing.
Democrats grasp for absolute power. They do not hide this desire, but rather express openly, and do not fear the consequences of expressing it because there are none.
I can see political re-education being very much a thing.
Democrats grasp for absolute power. They do not hide this desire, but rather express openly, and do not fear the consequences of expressing it because there are none.
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
Erm, uh, SJW's don't exist and anyone who says SJW unironically is a moron and they're just an Alt-Right Boogeyman
Also, they are fighting for Social Justice which is good and superheroes have always been about Social Justice
.....gaslighting is remarkably effective
You've been on SB, I take it?
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
You've been on SB, I take it?
And on other places, YouTube comments included.....it's pretty weird how they say that even without any Anti-SJW's around
I do find it amusing that your conception of what revolution is, is a small group of revolutionaries doing a guerrilla war or something.
Going by the Russian, it's the masses of people striking, marching and generally refusing the power of the state. You wouldn't be gunning down antifa super soldiers, you'd be using your skills to "annihilate the enemy with minimal casualties" on unarmed civilians.
Well, that's also what the US military specializes in, so you're right here, not a great chance of success
That's a nice ideal, but reality shows it to be a rather hollow sentiment when the chips are down.
I wish/hope Invictus is/was wrong about where things might go, and what might happen if the Dems ever get control over all 3 branches again.
Unfortunately, given everything I've seen, I don't think he is. ACW 2.0 may not be avoidable, no matter how hard we try to maintain friendships and communications across the aisle.
Harlock
I should have expected that really
I am talking more about the violent suppression of one's own citizens which was the topic of the time, not something like an armed foreign invasion of course. Personally I think the best way to fix any possible demographic issues is just to go out there and have a family yourself
Which is solid, achievable advice.
Personally, I'm not all that scared of demographics, simply because of the increasing number of minorities aligning more with the GOP than the Dems. A person's race/ethnicity is no way to judge what their politics will be years from now.
I'm also someone who does not put any stock in 'blood/ethnic purity', so fears others have about increasing minority populations doesn't affect me much. If my kid has darker skin, good; at least they won't turn into a lobster after a couple hours in the sun.
Airedale260
Well-known member
Eh, George Friedman from Stratfor has a decent track record so far. He did call the whole concept of there being a political realignment and needing a president with “the studied lack of sophistication of a Reagan, the casual dishonesty of an FDR” and something else by 2020 that would be part of it, as well as a shift in geopolitical priorities.
FTFY. For all that people love to talk about how much they hate America but prefer globalism and supranational organizations, etc, they forget that the entire linchpin is the U.S.
Not to mention that conservatism tends to go up as people grow up and start realizing how certain policies tend to take bites out of their paychecks, or how difficult owning a home and raising a family are.
Socially, sure, we get somewhat more liberal over time but there are limits, both here and also in Europe.
I always did wonder if the 'increasingly conservative' thing was less becoming a con, and more of a cooling effect on the left due to it's more radical nature. The UK generally votes conservative, and when it didn't it was because Labour had essentially deradicalised. It might be less of a 'more conservative with age' and more of a 'more likely to be less radical with age'.
This is what is normaly known as saying the quiet part out loud and is normally frowned upon. For a gang of people outraged about being accused of being Facist, you don't seem to be going out of your way to avoid the association.
Last edited:
Democracy only functions when we all agree on solid underlying principles, what is and is not okay to do, where the line is has to be laid out. Some people are dangerous and seditious in terms of what they will vote for, what they will campaign for; and they should be refused access to the democratic system because they will subvert and destroy it. If the correct method of doing things needs to be established by non democratic means then that's how it needs to be established.
The first democracies of the past understood this, foreigners could never vote, certain jobs were not given the vote; people who could not trusted to vote in a decent manner were barred from doing so, for very good reasons. If you have no connection to the nation by blood then you have no say in that nations future. If you work to undermine that nation and wilfully dilute it into nothing then you should have no say in that nations future.
Democracy works best if everyone follows the same christian morality, the same ethics and has the same entrenched love for their country and the people in it. It works when there are no people flooding into it, with no love of it and no stake in it trying to subvert and destroy it. Until proper borders (physical to the outside, spiritual and moral to the inside) are established then democracy is a sham, an open pool easily polluted.
LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
Non-democratic government or launching rebellions or coups is not fascism otherwise literally everyone and everything in history is fascist and if we go there. Why is fascism such a big deal then?
And thats one poster making his opinion felt and he came here more cause he was banned from SB.
And I have seen comments made of needing to resist the government and riot and put cities aflame by democrats if they don't get their way. So both sides are very radicalized or polarized at this point. It is what it is.
It doesn't take a brain genius to connect the two thoughts of "Socialists need to be violently and murderously opposed" and "All my political opponents are socialists"
LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
True enough. Though the same can be said for your side too in how they think in similar ways. "All who oppose me and don't agree are trolls and nazi's" which leads to "They all need to be killed in the revolution or re-educated in camps"