Right ... you keep telling yourself that.
Have you ever considered thay maybe, just maybe, those same Republicans felt the result reflected the will of the people and rationally decided that they had better things to do than mollycoddle a sore loser in the midst of throwing a temper tantrum?
The only people whose will that they would be concerned with, are the people that matter. Not the Demos, not the plurality, not 50%+1, not their voter base... I could belabour the point, but I'll wrap it up here: they don't care about the will of the people, not at all.
So, it is an utterly absurd thing to say. If they cared, they'd actually try to investigate and make sure that the truth of the matter was unveiled. They didn't, because they don't.
Further, calling the act of not conceding an election that has every sign of being tampered with is not throwing a temper tantrum. If you want a temper tantrum in regards to elections, I'll point you to the reaction to Trump getting elected, or to Bush* getting elected...
Also, I am pretty sure that we can also look at the antics with the left with Kavanaugh. I am pretty sure that was a massive temper tantrum....
So, huh, if anything I think what you are doing here is an act of projection or misattribution.