No Zach, as far as I can tell your domestic policy seems like it is just 'whatever helps the DoD, good; anything else is secondary' and that's about it, and that's pure neocon.
Like maybe you aren't as foolish about some things as the neocons were, like them opposing same-sex marriage or dismissing environmental issues, but in most regards you very much are a neocon, or at least a very good representation of what neocons look like to people on the outside.
War may be bound to happen somewhere, at some point, and may eventually require the US to go active in a large scale conflict again.
However, short of a direct, acknowledged attack on the US homeland that costs lives, you will not be seeing most of the nation feeling that our nation must engage in large scale conflict again.
Even the CCP attempting something on Taiwan, as much as we are 'bound' to defend it, won't cause a large scale conflict that actually will pull the US populace to your point of view. Partly because Taiwan has enough weapons and plans to ensure any CCP attempt is going to get ground-down and destroyed long before the it becomes any direct threat to the US homeland, and no, Taiwan won't see a draft happen either, so don't bet on being able to force people to fight.
You can try to advocate for the US ramping up arms production to ensure Taiwan has enough munitions to make sure the fight is over before the CCP can even land troops, and more weapons for Ukraine will get approved by most of the populace.
However, wanting to get a large scale conflict going, just to show how 'mighty' the US is, shows how very insecure you and people like you are about being in a peace time military after A-stan. The civilian populace is not as insecure as you are about that sort of thing, and thus isn't trying to find a way to have to 'show it off' to prove anything to anyone.
