China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

This is anecdotal, but a lot of but not all people I've talked to/watched comments of have complained of multi-week long headaches and muscle aching after taking the second booster shots.

To be frank, you're constantly demanding evidence and figures from the very same organizations and doctors whom are, for a multitude of reasons (e.g. self-preservation, greed/self-interest, being effectively bribed in the case of WHO and China), not actively reporting or are just ignoring how prevalent these side-effects are in people.

You're sticking to the same ol' rhetoric that these side-effects are simply as uncommon/rare as they are in other medications and side-effects, where news is slowly leaking out like blood from a thousand cuts that they're not.

And the ones that are? You pretty much dismiss them all in attitude as being "fringe lunatics" (especially if they're Christian, though granted you have a portion of said Christians saying this "God will protect me!" bullshit) and the like (again, granted, there are some that are batshit insane anti-vaxxers that need to be scoffed at, but you're placing everyone who complains or tries to tell people in this group).

No, not everyone whom is complaining of side-effects or know people who have suffered/died after taking the vaccines and the boosters are bots, or shit-stirrers, or nutcases, like you like to claim/cling to: There are so many people from different countries, from different walks of life, from different areas on the political spectrum, saying the same things, across different sites/mediums, over and over about the side-effects affecting them or their loved ones.

I respect that you have a contrasting viewpoint to most people here. It's actually needed as some people here sometimes veer straight into batshit conspiracy theory or even anti-vaxxer territory. But there will be never any way to please or satisfy you because the very notion that you could be wrong, that these vaccines and boosters are ineffective at best and outright harmful/lethal at worst, is alien to you; that these medical professionals and organizations that you, ironically, cling to like religious gospel have and still are being duplicitous with everyone at best.

"Five cheeseburgers per day is a good source of protein!" -- a study from ObesityIsFine.org (yes, this is a hyperbolic and sarcastic example).

This is your hill and you're willing to die on it, and you've become as bad as the batshit insane anti-vaxxers themselves but on the other end of scale.

Oh, and let's not forget the rash of footballers who have collapsed, had heart-attacks, or have died within a week of having the vaccine or boosters (which is fucking hilarious, as FIFA have stated there is "no correlation" despite all the players having the fucking vaccine within a week of collapsing! :ROFLMAO:).

Healthy athletes all developing heart-issues or just dying "expectantly". Hum!
I have not met a single person in the military get any side effects from COVID.
And I am on a base where people dying is very common for all BUT COVID Vax or the disease
 
The fact that random people on the internet yelling at camera's or claiming a thing totally happened so you better believe them, is what you two consider proof of a thing is very telling.

But guess what? It's not.

Do you know what is? A medical examiners report showing direct causation between a drug and or vaccine and a suffered side effect.

We've given you these kinds of links before. You just jump to 'this is a kook.'

Your demands for evidence are going to be ignored, because you've ignored evidence presented.
 
Vaermina be like:

Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Not that source. That is sketchy and not trustworthy.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

Those links do not explicitly state that.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

That source is invalid and untrustworthy.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

Like I suspected, no source. Don't let the door hut your ass on the way out.
 
Vaermina be like:

Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Not that source. That is sketchy and not trustworthy.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

Those links do not explicitly state that.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

That source is invalid and untrustworthy.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

Like I suspected, no source. Don't let the door hut your ass on the way out.
meanwhile, producing sources that don't even meet his own standards that he has set for rejecting your sources.
 
We've given you these kinds of links before. You just jump to 'this is a kook.'

Your demands for evidence are going to be ignored, because you've ignored evidence presented.
Maybe... I don't know... Try posting someone who isn't an easily proven kook or data that's not either bad or massively misrepresented?

I mean, it's not hard to meet minimum standards like that...

In fact, you should be doing that as a matter of course when researching a thing so you don't end up screaming magnetic alien vaccines like some of the people here have tried to do.
 
Maybe... I don't know... Try posting someone who isn't an easily proven kook or data that's not either bad or massively misrepresented?

I mean, it's not hard to meet minimum standards like that...

In fact, you should be doing that as a matter of course when researching a thing so you don't end up screaming magnetic alien vaccines like some of the people here have tried to do.

Considering your type of diatribe, everyone is a kook to you.
 
Maybe... I don't know... Try posting someone who isn't an easily proven kook or data that's not either bad or massively misrepresented?

The problem with this, is that you've made it clear that by your standards, disagreeing with you means someone is a kook rather than an expert, and if the data-set doesn't support your conclusions, then it's either false or misrepresented.
 
France had "allegedly" over 200000 cases in a day on France 24.

A day.

This Is utter fucking bullshit.

"1927 Liberian general election" bullshit.
 


Biden Admin is stopping/cancelling shipments of monclonal anti-bodies everywhere it seems, under the excuse it doesn' work against omicron, despite being effective against the delta strain which is still present.

They want more deaths to drive up the fear porn.
 
France had "allegedly" over 200000 cases in a day on France 24.

A day.

This Is utter fucking bullshit.

"1927 Liberian general election" bullshit.

The tests are notoriously shit and prone to false positives. There is no interest in being truthful, as the fear keeps the serfs in line and helps the narrative of "give us more power". They are just throwing everything and the kitchen sink on people to try and keep it going.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top