I don't doubt that'll form part of the spaghetti flung at the wall. Pretty dumb part though. Contingency planning for an attack on a hostile country is hardly damaging to any particular person, and "But it was personally useful to the defendant!" would have to be about the stupidest ever defense for illegal behaviour.
The evidence is irrelevant; everyone with a brain knows this trial is a blatant case of selective enforcement over something that, at worst, should have only merited a misdemeanor charge, not a felony one.
their goals are to
I don't think they want a communtard revolution but to establish something more akin to what the PRC has.
what the academics want, what the politicians want, what the activists want, and what the braindead NPCs want are all different things. but the goals and where they are steering the country towards? those match up.
By what insane standard does unauthorised taking of classified military plans, and then refusing to return them and even lying about doing so warrant a misdemeanor charge? Perhaps there's another example recently of a more normal person who took military files they weren't supposed to and shared them with people they shouldn't have... Oh yeah!
Or perhaps, more simply, their goal was to keep sensitive and damaging government and military information out of the hands of people with no authority over it, who were actively sharing it with even more unauthorised and unsecure people. But yeah, I suppose it's equally possible it's part of some brilliant yet bumbling, secret yet obvious, massive conspiracy.
Hillary's Emails, Bill Clinton's sock drawer, Biden's Garage with boxes from when he was Vice pres and a senator. nope. there have been other times this could have been applied to even more egregious violators. the difference here is it can be put on a political enemy.Or perhaps, more simply, their goal was to keep sensitive and damaging government and military information out of the hands of people with no authority over it, who were actively sharing it with even more unauthorised and unsecure people. But yeah, I suppose it's equally possible it's part of some brilliant yet bumbling, secret yet obvious, massive conspiracy.
Hillary Clinton's case lacked evidence but probably should have seen her charged with something they could get to stick. Bill was taken to court and won, because his documents were personal records which is wildly different from retaining military plans, and Biden had files he shouldn't have but by all accounts didn't even seem to know they were there and promptly gave them back as soon as they were asked for. To repeat myself, trump is only being charged for his conduct after he was asked for the documents, then subpoenaed for them, and then lied about having complied with that subpoena. There's several significant differences, beyond just the fact that it was trump.
that is certainly an interesting take. counter point. they have been hoaxing and saying they will get him since 2016. I have no faith in this accusation being any more credible than the piss tapes or russiagate or impeachment hoax 1 or impeachment hoax 2. after a certain amount of bad faith action and false accusations the default is that they are doing more of the same because they hate Orange Man.
Are you not following along at all? There's literally audio of him sharing the documents, whilst acknowledging they're classified, with publishers of all people, after he'd responded to the subpoena by saying he'd returned everything. The facts aren't actually in any kind of legal dispute, and are inherently damning.
Have there?
I mean, they just released that recording of Trump himself confessing to key elements of the case. Unless you're suggesting that they are deepfakes, then these accusations are more credible than the piss tapes until we get audio of Trump talking about that time he pissed on women in Moscow.
Given neither trump nor his lawyers have questioned their provenance, with trump instead arguing that the audio somehow exonerates him, I would be deeply surprised.
The pictures of where the boxes were stored also deepfakes, right? & all the witnesses are lying.
"But Joey got away with it when he did it!" didn't work in Kindergarten and shouldn't work now either.
and so we arrive at a point where no one trusts anyone unless they are politically aligned with them. while our system is based on being a relatively trusting society. there will surely be no repercussions or second order consequences from these actions as trust is further eroded.
coolio I totally trust that as much as the piss tapes that show a notorious germaphobe and clean freak getting a hotel in russia to piss on a bed. and that the tapes of trump on an elevator somewhere doing something bad totally exist. and that this time the walls are really closing in. that this time it isn't politically motivated and they are finally acting in the best interests of the country and not to maintain their power and line their pockets.
neat. I totally believe that they were in no way cut down, edited, or fed into a program that will sample it and other things trump has said to make it say something else. they totally have him this time. the walls are closing in.
Coolio. Again, trump has himself basically vouched for the recordings authenticity.
That wasn't really Trump, he died on Jan. 6 (disguised as Ashli Babbitt) and he was replaced by a body double who's spent the last few years systematically discrediting Trump.