Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Is this the Trump curse metasizing?
Is this the Trump curse metasizing?
It pretty much summed up as an ugly lingering chapter of the 20th Century. The Eugenics movement. It starts off small with things like people with disabilities need to be sterilized. Then it goes to we should gene select for optimal offspring. Then it goes to this social or racial class is superior to this group because of better genes. Then it leads to things like the Holocaust. Yeah we should value life and stamp out Eugenics whenever it's ugly head rears up. And when you do a deep dive Eugenics was very deep in the Abortion movement. And one of it's goals.
What I love about the eugenics movement...is that so many of its proponents were so completely and utterly dysgenic themselves (I mean Jesus Christ the appalling physiognomy and crippling neurosis and drug addictions..) that it almost looked like the entire movement was created so a bunch of social parasites and spazzoids could militantly cope post IRL.View attachment 1373
This sort of thing happens a lot. I distinctly remember that meme, where a neonazi is near identical to the "sub-human" in a old nazi propaganda poster.
Worst yet he was a fuckin' jew himself! Well, he didn't believe in judaism, but was descent of jews.The founders of Nazism themselves were recreational drug using wealthy NEETs who wanted to explore mysticism and bang chicks without seeming like a bunch of reprobates.
And Hitler himself was the ur example of a mongrel, right down to possibly being illegitimate. Was also himself a wastrel and a druggie and a neopagan.
Worst yet he was a fuckin' jew himself! Well, he didn't believe in judaism, but was descent of jews.
dude don't put that shit on us.
We already had to deal with the worst camping trip ever I think we have had enough of the fucker.
There's a bit of that, I'll grant you; but I'd argue it's justified. I was a burden on my parents, and I failed to make something of myself in the end. They deserved something better than me, and I wish I could have given it to them.
Are you one of those people who want to outright ban abortion entirely, no exceptions? Because while I don't consider myself to be pro-Abortion, I can't agree with that position; there are just certain situations where, on balance, I feel it should be available as an option. You don't have to agree with me, but demonizing me isn't going to convince me that I'm wrong.And I'd rather not have people have their lives taken, because their existence inconveniences others. This is just another way that human life is being devalued, and these days human life is plenty devalued.
So keep on killing your kids until you get what you want, got it. Pretty morally warped.
They don't have a right to exist, since they don't exist. It is patently absurd to claim this. Also, it seems that you are implying that a person with a serious disability has less right to exist than someone who is purely theoretical. Sounds pretty messed up to me. I mean, if we take your weak gotcha seriously, we'd have to treat every sperm as sacred.
Don't be disingenuous; there's a massive difference between getting a child with a malformed brain and getting one that isn't the gender you'd prefer. Also I'm not arguing in favor of retractive abortion, as you seem to be suggesting.So we should practice infanticide, gotcha. And how do we define "broken", after all it is entirely relative. I am sure the Chinese parents who drowned their daughters (or coat-wired them or whatever twisted thing they did) would argue their daughters were "broken" in comparison to a son. The Spartans would consider any child without a certain vigour "broken". I could continue, but it would belabor the point. It is the same energy, wanting to dispose of your offspring because they don't meet an arbitrary measure.
I have no doubt that many people might have considered me "broken", due to having many problems in my childhood and actually being sickly at certain points. Yet, I turned out quite decently, better than many people without such problems. If you have your way, people like me would be snuffed out before we had the chance to actually live- all because someone decided we were broken. And, really, they had the choice and made it. If the natural results don't pan out the way they like, they cannot penalize another person because their gamble didn't pay off.
I may not be dead yet, but it's not like I didn't work my butt off trying. I just couldn't develop the social skills necessary to get ahead, and it turns out that scholastic achievements are worth absolutely nothing by themselves.You aren't dead yet, the clock's on your side. Do something about it, instead of advocating that millions be slaughtered because they might, maybe, one day use their affliction as justification to become a neet.
So are you volunteering to take care of a low-functioning autistic child then? For their entire lifespan?It pretty much summed up as an ugly lingering chapter of the 20th Century. The Eugenics movement. It starts off small with things like people with disabilities need to be sterilized. Then it goes to we should gene select for optimal offspring. Then it goes to this social or racial class is superior to this group because of better genes. Then it leads to things like the Holocaust. Yeah we should value life and stamp out Eugenics whenever it's ugly head rears up. And when you do a deep dive Eugenics was very deep in the Abortion movement. And one of it's goals.
You act like I don't have autistic and physically disabled people in my immediate family.. And when my mother was dying from cancer I was one of her care givers. So spare me your line of thinking. Been there and done that.Are you one of those people who want to outright ban abortion entirely, no exceptions? Because while I don't consider myself to be pro-Abortion, I can't agree with that position; there are just certain situations where, on balance, I feel it should be available as an option. You don't have to agree with me, but demonizing me isn't going to convince me that I'm wrong.
Don't be disingenuous; there's a massive difference between getting a child with a malformed brain and getting one that isn't the gender you'd prefer. Also I'm not arguing in favor of retractive abortion, as you seem to be suggesting.
I may not be dead yet, but it's not like I didn't work my butt off trying. I just couldn't develop the social skills necessary to get ahead, and it turns out that scholastic achievements are worth absolutely nothing by themselves.
So are you volunteering to take care of a low-functioning autistic child then? For their entire lifespan?
Are you one of those people who want to outright ban abortion entirely, no exceptions? Because while I don't consider myself to be pro-Abortion, I can't agree with that position; there are just certain situations where, on balance, I feel it should be available as an option. You don't have to agree with me, but demonizing me isn't going to convince me that I'm wrong.
Don't be disingenuous; there's a massive difference between getting a child with a malformed brain and getting one that isn't the gender you'd prefer. Also I'm not arguing in favor of retractive abortion, as you seem to be suggesting.
I may not be dead yet, but it's not like I didn't work my butt off trying. I just couldn't develop the social skills necessary to get ahead, and it turns out that scholastic achievements are worth absolutely nothing by themselves.
So are you volunteering to take care of a low-functioning autistic child then? For their entire lifespan?
if we were poor we would want even more kids because the kids would add to the amount of labor a household can produce. older kids help take care of younger kids. as they grow they can take on more responsibility around the house. every kid helps provide a safety net for their parents as they age out of the work force. it takes a government mandate to force or incentivize the poor into making such horrific decisions.In both China, under the One Child Policy, there were quite a few cases where they made sure the only kid they had was a boy, for cultural reasons, as well as the way that a boy is more useful around the farm, in the vast majority of times.
This, I'm told, was true even in backwater rural places, where they had no method of determining said kid's sex until it was born. The families in question would effectively abort said baby, if it was a girl, after it was born. After all, a "stillbirth" didn't count as a child under the Policy.
Even without the said policy, I heard similar stories in India, some of the poor rural families there.
Horrible? Yes. But, it's only because of how insanely rich we are, that we can think in terms of saving every life we can, including those who can never thank us for it.
I got to go to where ever that man learned magic.
Apparently over in Arizona they're already fucking around and finding out
I am 100% Pro-Life.What I love about the eugenics movement...is that so many of its proponents were so completely and utterly dysgenic themselves (I mean Jesus Christ the appalling physiognomy and crippling neurosis and drug addictions..) that it almost looked like the entire movement was created so a bunch of social parasites and spazzoids could militantly cope post IRL.View attachment 1373
Schumer opened the door to this bullshit.As far as Im concerned let it burn, its going to suck a lot of people will die, churches will be attacked and people might be murdered as they pray, but if that's what it takes to get the grill bois and soccer moms to finally give a shit then so be it. The die has been cast.
I hope that redditor understand what they lack in cops they make up for in self defense.Least deranged Redditor
unlikely. but maybe if people post that video of kyle rittenhouse perforating that one asshole's arm he might.I hope that redditor understand what they lack in cops they make up for in self defense.