SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

[Karmic Acumen]

The problem with the first option is that you would forget, and the alerts won't tell you to go back to it. The second is you being a piece of shit in public. The third one is only practical sometimes.

Sorry man, but your personal circumstances don't really sound like something the original poster should have to be worried about.

 

[LordsFire]

Sorry man, but your personal circumstances don't really sound like something the original poster should have to be worried about.

If someone is posting a video, clearly they think other people should watch it. It's reasonable to expect them to provide a basic justification for why it's worth someone else's time.

If they don't want to, that's up to them, but it'll generally mean fewer people will watch the video they linked.

 

[bintananth]

If someone is posting a video, clearly they think other people should watch it. It's reasonable to expect them to provide a basic justification for why it's worth someone else's time.

If they don't want to, that's up to them, but it'll generally mean fewer people will watch the video they linked.

At the very least include the title in the post. Sometimes the vid is flagged so it can only be viewed by opening it in YouTube.

I skip right past those without a further thought.

 

[Robovski]

I rarely watch the videos posted by themselves. I also very rarely feel like I missed out on something.