SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
She is a centrist left.
I am getting her to come around to our side

Good luck.

(Personally, I'm not sure I identify as conservative or right-wing, per se, but the more I look at the Left and the work it's been doing over the decades, the more I've begun to position myself as "anti-Left" for sure.)
 

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
I feel a great sense of ambivalence.

I never had a dog in this fight, but after the left went after a whole bunch of my rights I don't really care about their whining about losing this right.
They also can't see the forest for the trees being so zealous in their horrendous practice. This will be shifted back to the states to decide as it isn't covered in the original constitution as was the argument even me a layman of your constitution understood that.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
Salt prices collapse due to over abundance of supply







unknown.png


IMG_20220624_113416_147.jpg
 

strunkenwhite

Well-known member
Also, the opinion specifically stated nothing in this decision should be looked at as being related to, or relevant for, anything outside the issue of abortion.
If the "critical moral question" (of the fate of another human being) is what distinguishes abortion from the other issues decided on similar reasoning, what would preclude states from forbidding gay couples to adopt? Since raising a child, I'd imagine, is also important to the fate of a human being.
Definitely glad to have him at the wheel in my home state right now.
VA is one of those states where governors can't serve consecutive terms, right? I'd ask if you thought it helped or hurt his reelection prospects but if I'm right then by the time he can run again (2028?) I expect the state legislature will have settled the question one way or the other already.
 

VictortheMonarch

Victor the Crusader
If the "critical moral question" (of the fate of another human being) is what distinguishes abortion from the other issues decided on similar reasoning, what would preclude states from forbidding gay couples to adopt? Since raising a child, I'd imagine, is also important to the fate of a human being.
I mean, nothing should theoretically get in the way, but then you start throwing in the facts of that Gays have a higher chance to molest and abuse children, then you see where the problem is. But that's rather off topic. We on that good Roe v Wade stuff rn.
 

Stargazer

Well-known member
Heck yeah boyo's. Time to dismantle this shitty industry and do what is nessessary. Not get rid of it entirely but ruin it to the point it's predatory practices are gone.

It should be abolished entirely.

VA is one of those states where governors can't serve consecutive terms, right? I'd ask if you thought it helped or hurt his reelection prospects but if I'm right then by the time he can run again (2028?) I expect the state legislature will have settled the question one way or the other already.

Yes, governors can't serve consecutive terms in VA.
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
Most people getting mad, or getting absolutely hysterical about how "they will come for gay marriage and inter racial marriage next" have no fucking idea what Roe v. Wade even was or why it was a contentious ruling.

The salt is imense. The tears flow freely. I look forwards to the fire bombing of churches by progressives.
Also, the opinion specifically stated nothing in this decision should be looked at as being related to, or relevant for, anything outside the issue of abortion.
Something to bear in mind.

Even if all the substantive due process cases were looked at and repealed, same-sex Marriage has what should have been the core of the ruling in the first place: Full Faith and Credit. The absolute worst case for same-sex marriage at this point is that is that states could be allowed to issue or not issue marriage licenses for same-sex marriages, but that states (and the Federal government) that do not issue them MUST recognize the same-sex marriage license issues by other states (this is likewise the absolutely worst case for miscegenation laws as well). That's what the Full Faith and Credit clause is all about in the first place, ensuring contracts including marriages issued by one state are recognized by all.

Basing the same-sex marriage ruling on substantive due process was always a dumb move and left it open to attack from that angle, especially when there's a much stronger foundation via the Full Faith and Credit clause. The issue there is, of course, is that the FF&C clause still leaves some of the issue up to the states, which proponents of same-sex marriage did not want since it was always about forcing those who opposed to have to accommodate them, rather than ensuring they could get married.
 

Typhonis

Well-known member

Batrix2070

RON/PLC was a wonderful country.
So the beginning of normalcy?
Will there be an American #Women'sStrike?
One thing is for sure, sometimes it bothers me that what happened in Poland a few years ago is suddenly happening in the West.
One thing is certain, you, dear Americans, are facing a total madness in which the other side will be grossly dishonest, will allow you to break the laws they normally want to force you to, and create once again only the right vision of history.
Already the BLM was a prototype demonstration on their part, now it will be worse.
I'll just say this, Good luck. You'll need it over the next few weeks.
And an iron psyche for the collective whining of cracking asses.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top