Omnimercurial
Active member
Technically true, but economically unfeasible due to unacceptable energy invested for energy returned once all externalities are factored in. Same thing for green energy which would actually be more environmentally destructive than just building more coal plants and in return, kill fewer animals. Because wind turbines kill a lot of birds and the solar panel farms disrupted the habitats of numerous endangered species and the heat generated is killing migrating birds. Not to mention the heavy use of coal products to make solar panels and the steel for wind turbines. By contrast the Alaska Pipeline led to a population increase of caribou and a rise in their natural predators. Of course the only real green energy solution is hydroelectric dams which we have grossly underutilized because of environmentalists.
But hey I will stop letting facts get in the way of your delusions.
Russia is reinforcing the Kherson Front to continue the likely push on Odessa and Transnistria.
Delusions huh? How.... Polite.
Energy efficiency issues can be addressed by economy of scale, such as widespread adoption and larger scale facilities.
As to Enviromentalism.... Who gives a fuck.
Kill the Birds.
Enviromentalism is used as an excuse. The populace get pressured to take on financial burdens and recycle despite most sorted waste not being recycled.
It is a pathetic mess.
Environmentalism could be less pathetic it is true, but could is far from that which IS.