Meme Thread for Both Posting and Discussing Memes

Fpahl3pXwAI5XVo
 
Question, what does this imply?

Does Biden eat so much ice-cream that he has a button for it?
Was this scripted?
Is his minder listening in to the conversation and the button just means "make it so"?
for meme value I just want it to be that biden asked for ice cream so much they got a freezer full of it and an intern whose job is to grab one and bring it to him when this buzzer goes off.
 
He and the guy from InRange used cooperate a lot in the past, but IR got really outspoken about his political beliefs (BLM support, transgenderism, satan worship...), so Ian distanced himself and is now best buds with balaclava guy. IR guy is really salty.

I can forgive intersectionality, but I draw the line at Satanism.
 
Context, please? I recognize Ian from Forgotten Weapons.
the talking balaclava from administrative results was doxed by a group of libs, when the libs started to take their flak karl sided with said libs.
Ian, otoh, seems to have sided with the talking balaclava as Ian showed up in a resent administrative results video on the hcar, (time stamped to Ian showing up.)
 
Con Artist by Jflaxman said:


This image should speak for itself but there's more to it if you're interested.

At first glance Glenda Glubbinslough might seem a wholly fictional creation, but unfortunately she is not.

The painting, for want of a better word, is a faithful reproduction of one I saw at a Melbourne gallery and could have bought for $2000.

The description beneath it is a pastiche of others I read under similar works, and would have probably caught no-one's attention if it had replaced any of them.

This is not an attempt to deny or rewrite any history steeped in genocide. It is also not meant to suggest any country could or should not be improved. It is a response to visual art whose message, however well-intentioned, can only be understood through wall text. This makes it less accessible to some and leads others to question its sincerity. Among those not already converted it can do more to harm than help a cause.

The original Melbourne painting sold, presumably to some wealthy buyer who wanted to show off their moral credentials. At this point some might argue there is nothing quite so satisfying as robbing the guilt-ridden bourgeoisie, but the time and money spent on such games might have been better spent on helping the truly disadvantaged sorts I saw only a few streets away.

I'm not denying Glenda Glubbinsloughs the right to create whatever they want or others the right to buy their creations. I just hope that every time this world gives us a Glenda Glubbinslough it also gives us a jflaxman who calls them out for what they are.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top