MrBirthday
Agent of Catgirl Genocide
Well, having followed Robert Barnes for the past several months, I'll opine that from day one it was the goal of Kyle's council to get him convicted and fleece the fundraiser in the process.
Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Thread
- Thread starter LindyAF
- Start date
He's saying that they want to lose the case and pocket the donation money
MrBirthday
Agent of Catgirl Genocide
To be clear, it seems to be less his attorney and more his head of security, who has assumed complete control of the Rittenhouses' lives.
Seriously, watch the video I posted. If goes into far more detail than I can manage.
Never trust lawyers these days.
Most of them are only ever after the money.
Once they have the money, they will cut and run.
Most of them are only ever after the money.
Once they have the money, they will cut and run.
I know "Boot licker" here, but they can do that. Evidence can be presented in court but not be released publicly.
Why did they have a plane in the air?
I also doubt they had a stingray, unless they had it there for another reason and have the FISA warrant to back it up
Why did they have a plane in the air?
I also doubt they had a stingray, unless they had it there for another reason and have the FISA warrant to back it up
LindyAF
Well-known member
Not sure the rest of this post was necessary.
If the FBI only shares the evidence with the court... okay. If they destroy evidence the defense is asking for though?
Not a one time thing, either - feds kept "losing" evidence after Waco that might have been unfavorable to them, just off the top of my head. Feds don't deserve a reasonable doubt.
Sobek
Disgusting Scalie
They can, but WHY? One good reason is what I ask for.
There are moments when said blocking would have made sense, like say they are trying to keep a lid and stop a possible vigilante mob from forming on a particularly bad case. But here? It makes little to no sense.
And then there is the "loosing" of evidence. THAT part you cannot defend, at all. Nothing they say will convince me there wasn't some foul play going on. There is no way it wasn't just deleted. Why?
There are moments when said blocking would have made sense, like say they are trying to keep a lid and stop a possible vigilante mob from forming on a particularly bad case. But here? It makes little to no sense.
And then there is the "loosing" of evidence. THAT part you cannot defend, at all. Nothing they say will convince me there wasn't some foul play going on. There is no way it wasn't just deleted. Why?
LindyAF
Well-known member
lmao
What?
They literally can present evidence to the court but not the public.
That is all I was saying
LindyAF
Well-known member
Your honor, I'm not saying destroying evidence is good, but here's the thing, technically...
...Where did I say destroying evidence was good?
Your honor, I'm not saying destroying evidence is good, but here's the thing, technically...
I was saying they can show evidence but not release it to the public
There is no good reason to hide it from the defense team, even if they do not want to broadcast it to the public, and it's widely known cops and intel agencies have been flying Stingray's around in Cessna's over urban areas for years, hoovering up signals 'just in case' and getting warrants after the fact if they have to use their stuff in court.
I'm not saying this is good.
I am saying they can
And people like Judicial Watch and others can then swamp the courts with FOIA request, or people can just leak shit like the low def aerial video the FBI didn't want getting out, and had to be leaked to someone like Human Events.
This is part of why Snowden is a hero to many; much of the public has no reason to trust our own intel agencies and has plenty of reason to view them as wanna-be NKVDs.
Snowden is no hero.
Calling him such just praises the secrets he gave away to our enemies so he can have safe passage there.
And FOIA can be denied. Swamping can only do so much
All I am saying is they can do it
Not that they should, or what
And that they are doing it like that, in this instance, shows maybe why they shouldn't have the power to do so.
The intel agencies and community serve themselves and their bureacracy, not the American people, who are often just more victims of their abuse or malfeasance.