Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum

[TheRomanSlayer]

This was one of the books Bin Laden had in his compound, which is why it's on the CIA's website:

Why would Osama Bin Laden, of all people, be reading a book that would have sounded like it was written by a so-called ‘conspiracy theorist’?

 

[Iconoclast]

Why would Osama Bin Laden, of all people, be reading a book that would have sounded like it was written by a so-called ‘conspiracy theorist’?

His entire bookshelf is actually available in declassified files:

Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Bin Ladin Bookshelf declassified

www.dni.gov

November 2017 Release of Abbottabad Compound Material

www.cia.gov

These were some of the English language books he had:

• The 2030 Spike by Colin Mason
• A Brief Guide to Understanding Islam by I. A. Ibrahim
• America’s Strategic Blunders by Willard Matthias
• America’s “War on Terrorism” by Michel Chossudovsky
• Al-Qaeda’s Online Media Strategies: From Abu Reuter to Irhabi 007 by Hanna Rogan
• The Best Democracy Money Can Buy by Greg Palast
• The Best Enemy Money Can Buy by Anthony Sutton
• Black Box Voting, Ballot Tampering in the 21st Century by Bev Harris
• Bloodlines of the Illuminati by Fritz Springmeier
• Bounding the Global War on Terror by Jeffrey Record
• Checking Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions by Henry Sokolski and Patrick Clawson
• Christianity and Islam in Spain 756-1031 A.D. by C. R. Haines
• Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, and Strategies by Cheryl Benard
• Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins
• Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Committee of 300 by John Coleman
• Crossing the Rubicon by Michael Ruppert
• Fortifying Pakistan: The Role of U.S. Internal Security Assistance (only the book’s introduction) by C. Christine Fair and Peter Chalk
• Guerilla Air Defense: Antiaircraft Weapons and Techniques for Guerilla Forces by James Crabtree
• Handbook of International Law by Anthony Aust
• Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance by Noam Chomsky
• Imperial Hubris by Michael Scheuer
• In Pursuit of Allah’s Pleasure by Asim Abdul Maajid, Esaam-ud-Deen and Dr. Naahah Ibrahim
• International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific by John Ikenberry and Michael Mastandano
• Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions since World War II by William Blum
• Military Intelligence Blunders by John Hughes-Wilson
• Project MKULTRA, the CIA’s program of research in behavioral modification. Joint hearing before the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Committee on Human Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, first session, August 3, 1977. United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Intelligence.
• Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies by Noam Chomsky
• New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 by David Ray Griffin
• New Political Religions, or Analysis of Modern Terrorism by Barry Cooper
• Obama’s Wars by Bob Woodward
• Oxford History of Modern War by Charles Townsend
• The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers by Paul Kennedy
• Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower by William Blum
• The Secret Teachings of All Ages by Manly Hall (1928)
• Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins
• The Taking of America 1-2-3 by Richard Sprague
• Unfinished Business, U.S. Overseas Military Presence in the 21st Century by Michael O’Hanlon
• The U.S. and Vietnam 1787-1941 by Robert Hopkins Miller
• “Website Claims Steve Jackson Games Foretold 9/11,” article posted on ICV2.com (this file contained only a single saved web page)

Bin Laden took great interest in what analysts and think tanks had written about Al-Qaeda and kept a library of various political science and conspiracy theory tomes, from Noam Chomsky to Michael friggin' Ruppert.

 

[Bassoe]

...but they don't understand that to have an empire your have to compensate the people who make it possible...

The problem is, they have thought of this, here's their solution to the "free-willed human guards will turn on us if we create the dystopia we want" "problem".

Robot dogs now have sniper rifles

In a Thursday Instagram post, SWORD International called the robot “Warfighters best friend.”

nypost.com

 

[Iconoclast]

The problem is, they have thought of this, here's their solution to the "free-willed human guards will turn on us if we create the dystopia we want" "problem".

Robot dogs now have sniper rifles

In a Thursday Instagram post, SWORD International called the robot “Warfighters best friend.”

nypost.com

No, no, no. That's not the solution. That will never work. Those can only ever supplement an occupation.

The way they'll create the dystopia they want without the free-willed human guards turning on them is by removing their free will.

That is to say, they plan on quite literally turning people into robots.

https://govtribe.com/file/government-file/hr001118s0029-hr001118s0029-dot-pdf

The high-resolution neural interfaces available today require a craniotomy for direct placement
into the brain. The burden of surgery and associated risks are currently too high for this approach
to be considered for use by able-bodied individuals. The N3 program aims to overcome these
issues by developing a nonsurgical neural interface that is safe for human use, and that has high
spatiotemporal resolution and low latency to enable function on par with current microelectrode
technology. The interface must be bidirectional and will integrate technology for both neural
recording (read out) and neural stimulation (write in). The developed technology must be
agnostic to the interfaced DoD-relevant system.

To reach high temporal and spatial resolution, N3 will focus on two approaches: noninvasive
(Technical Area 1 –TA1) and “minutely” invasive (Technical Area 2 – TA2) neural interfaces.
Noninvasive interfaces will include the development of sensors and stimulators that do not
breach the skin and will achieve neural ensemble resolution (<1mm3). Minutely invasive
approaches will permit nonsurgical delivery of a nanotransducer: this could include a self-
assembly approach, viral vectors, molecular, chemical and/or biomolecular technology delivered
to neurons of interest to reach single neuron resolution (<50µm3). In this application, the
developed technology will serve as an interface between targeted neurons and the
sensor/stimulator. They should be sufficiently small to not cause tissue damage or impede the
natural neuronal circuit. The sensors and stimulators developed under the minutely invasive
approach will be external to the skull and will interact with the nanotransducers to enable high
resolution neural recording and stimulation.

Magnetism Plays Key Roles in DARPA Research to Develop Brain-Machine Interface without Surgery - Magnetics Magazine

Some of the most exotic research involving magnetism is sponsored by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, known as DARPA. One of their programs, literally, boggles the mind as it delves into areas once [...]

magneticsmag.com

The N3 teams are pursuing a range of approaches that use optics, acoustics and electromagnetics to record neural activity and send signals back to the brain at high speed and resolution. The research is split between two tracks. Teams are pursuing either completely noninvasive interfaces that are entirely external to the body or minutely invasive interface systems that include nanotransducers that can be temporarily and non-surgically delivered to the brain to improve signal resolution.

Noninvasive neurotechnologies such as the electroencephalogram and transcranial direct current stimulation already exist, but do not offer the precision, signal resolution and portability required for advanced applications by people working in real-world settings. The envisioned N3 technology breaks through the limitations of existing technology by delivering an integrated device that does not require surgical implantation but has the precision to read from and write to 16 independent channels within a 16mm3 volume of neural tissue within 50ms.

Each channel is capable of specifically inter-acting with sub-millimeter regions of the brain with a spatial and temporal specificity that is comparable to existing invasive approaches. Individual devices can be combined to provide the ability to interface to multiple points in the brain at once. To enable future non-invasive brain-machine interfaces, N3 researchers are working to develop solutions that address challenges such as the physics of scattering and weakening of signals as they pass through skin, skull, and brain tissue, as well as designing algorithms for decoding and encoding neural signals that are represented by modalities such as light, acoustic, or electromagnetic energy.

Internet of Thinks: Securing the Brain Computer Interface (BCI)

In our latest whitepaper we explore the emerging phenomenon of Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) looking at the potential social impact and the cybersecurity...

newsroom.nccgroup.com

From a security perspective, the volume of potential threats is vast, ranging from design, supply chain and surgical impact through to removal and decommissioning.

However, once the BCI is implanted and operational in the user’s brain, some of the main security threats include:

• Brain Control – this is where adversaries would seek to make someone think and/or do something beyond their free will, or use/steal their brain power for computational tasks (e.g. a botnet composed of multiple compromised BCIs). The level of control could be broken down into three main types:
  • Movement control – make someone perform a physical action (e.g. move their limbs) beyond their free will.
    o Emotion control – make someone experience or feel a specific emotion that is not their actual current emotional state (e.g. invoke fear or paranoia in a victim)
  • Neurological Function Blocking – blocking specific functions of the brain (e.g. a Denial of Service) or temporarily denying BCI operation such as in a Ransomware scenario (Brainsomware), where a compromised BCI, BCI NCD or application is held to ransom
• Mind Reading – this is where attackers may seek to gain unauthorised access to someone’s thoughts or secrets (e.g. passwords), or be able to intercept or infer such information from wireless broadcasts, subliminal cues and/or adversarial AI techniques

This is not science fiction. The necessary foundational technologies for this all exist, or are soon to exist.

 

[sillygoose]

and thats why I think their going to lose and lose hard, but that they will successfully kill millions of people, and when its all over technocracy will become another idelology that will be looked upon with horror.

Functionally it is really no different than communism, but there are still people that think that idea is great despite its horrors.

 

[LordsFire]

This is not science fiction. The necessary foundational technologies for this all exist, or are soon to exist.

This generally reads a lot more like 'we're totally going to have this in just another year or few' optimism of futurists, not a matter of actual hard science.

Neuroscience, especially as it pertains to the brain, is an immensely sophisticated thing, and far too much still is not understood, such as precise correlation between brain activity and actual thoughts. When we actually have reliably working cybernetic prosthetics, a far simpler endeavor, I'll take the threat of actual mind control and mind reading much more seriously.

As things currently stand, it looks more like a particularly cruel way to torture, cripple, and kill people. I do not doubt that a lot of intellectual elitists would happily do that in the pursuit of the 'greater good,' but pain and death is a far more likely result than effective mind control.

 

[Agent23]

This generally reads a lot more like 'we're totally going to have this in just another year or few' optimism of futurists, not a matter of actual hard science.

Neuroscience, especially as it pertains to the brain, is an immensely sophisticated thing, and far too much still is not understood, such as precise correlation between brain activity and actual thoughts. When we actually have reliably working cybernetic prosthetics, a far simpler endeavor, I'll take the threat of actual mind control and mind reading much more seriously.

As things currently stand, it looks more like a particularly cruel way to torture, cripple, and kill people. I do not doubt that a lot of intellectual elitists would happily do that in the pursuit of the 'greater good,' but pain and death is a far more likely result than effective mind control.

We actually have a term for these types of people here, like this buffoon, and Shvab, and the whole WEF/Neocuck/blob/eurocrat establishment.
"Thinks he/she has God by the dick..."
Just a bunch of dumb fuckers separated from reality, universally rich brats that climbed a stupid greasy poll all their lives, but never held a real job and never produced anything.

 

[Iconoclast]

This generally reads a lot more like 'we're totally going to have this in just another year or few' optimism of futurists, not a matter of actual hard science.

Neuroscience, especially as it pertains to the brain, is an immensely sophisticated thing, and far too much still is not understood, such as precise correlation between brain activity and actual thoughts. When we actually have reliably working cybernetic prosthetics, a far simpler endeavor, I'll take the threat of actual mind control and mind reading much more seriously.

As things currently stand, it looks more like a particularly cruel way to torture, cripple, and kill people. I do not doubt that a lot of intellectual elitists would happily do that in the pursuit of the 'greater good,' but pain and death is a far more likely result than effective mind control.

They've already done it. They have already manipulated people's emotional states with DBS electrodes. If you can do it with a DBS electrode jammed into a brain region, then it's trivial for a BCI to do the same, since BCIs have much higher resolution.

Treating severe depression with on-demand brain stimulation

UCSF Health physicians have successfully treated a patient with severe depression by tapping into the specific brain circuit involved in depressive brain patterns and resetting them using the equivalent of a pacemaker for the brain.

psychiatry.ucsf.edu

https://www.alzforum.org/sites/default/files/legacy/images/new/DBSPart2.pdf

Impulsive behavior, such as hypersexuality or addiction to gambling, may remain after DBS or even worsen. In one instance, scientists in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, reported on a man who got hooked on slot machines after his DBS surgery. He had no history of compulsive gambling; indeed, family members described him as “stingy.”

 

[ATP]

Technocracy is looked at with horror now.

Look at all the future dystopia movies that have come out. People know what could happen. The consequences are easy to spot.

But the elites look at those dystopias with envy. Only longing to have that power for themselves. They are already the villains of those movies.

They just haven't gotten to take over totally yet and they want that bad.

And poor fools do not see,that in world state most elites would be not needed anymore.They never create world state,but if they did,i bet that 90% of current elites or more would be purged.

 

[LordsFire]

They've already done it. They have already manipulated people's emotional states with DBS electrodes. If you can do it with a DBS electrode jammed into a brain region, then it's trivial for a BCI to do the same, since BCIs have much higher resolution.

Emotional manipulation is a world away from reading thoughts or controlling thoughts.

People have known how to manipulate each others emotions for thousands of years. Having a way to do it that requires a brain in the head isn't that impressive, though it is creepy and dangerous.

 

[Iconoclast]

Emotional manipulation is a world away from reading thoughts or controlling thoughts.

People have known how to manipulate each others emotions for thousands of years. Having a way to do it that requires a brain in the head isn't that impressive, though it is creepy and dangerous.

I agree with you, there. Based on what I've seen, that kind of granularity would be basically impossible to achieve with this sort of tech, at the moment.

The thing is, if you can manipulate people's emotional states, you can change their subjective value judgments over just about anything. It doesn't have to be anything really sophisticated, like deleting individual thoughts from people's heads, or controlling their limbs from afar, or anything like that. It can be something as simple and crude as giving them a slight boost to euphoria when they're watching a YouTube video of a political candidate that the Controllers like, or creating a sense of anxiety when they're watching a video of one they don't. Based on what I've seen, this is doable with current technology, and the possible scenarios for its use are limitless.

Imagine if you could make an automated system that profiles people based on their Facebook posts, determining their level of radicalization, and then create anxiety in an entire group of people when their GPS tags on their phones are in close proximity. No human intervention required; all automated by an algorithm that trawls a huge dataset that no human being could ever be bothered to examine manually.

https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf

A cognitive attack is not a threat that can be countered in the air, on land, at sea, in cyberspace, or in space. Rather, it may well be happening in any or all of these domains, for one simple reason: humans are the contested domain.

humans are the contested domain

We are seriously getting into some Black Mirror shit.

 

[Bacle]

Emotional manipulation is a world away from reading thoughts or controlling thoughts.

People have known how to manipulate each others emotions for thousands of years. Having a way to do it that requires a brain in the head isn't that impressive, though it is creepy and dangerous.

This is far from just 'emotional manipulation' in terms of what it can be used for; think of it's use for the battlefield, ala Halo-like 'neural laces'.

There is a reason groups like DARPA and such have been fiddling with this sort of thing for years, and is probably much farther ahead in this tech than what is publicly known.

The pace of tech change is only accelerating; acting like this is too 'complicated' or 'not tested enough' to worry about is part of what groups like the WEF count on to keep people from fighting back against their BS on a large scale.

The future is going to look a lot like Ghost in the Shell, 1984, and Serenity/Firefly, and pretending that such stuff is too far off to worry about is foolish and why the asshole's keep winning.

 

[Iconoclast]

This is far from just 'emotional manipulation' in terms of what it can be used for; think of it's use for the battlefield, ala Halo-like 'neural laces'.

There is a reason groups like DARPA and such have been fiddling with this sort of thing for years, and is probably much farther ahead in this tech than what is publicly known.

The pace of tech change is only accelerating; acting like this is too 'complicated' or 'not tested enough' to worry about is part of what groups like the WEF count on to keep people from fighting back against their BS on a large scale.

The future is going to look a lot like Ghost in the Shell, 1984, and Serenity/Firefly, and pretending that such stuff is too far off to worry about is foolish and why the asshole's keep winning.

Well, we know exactly what DARPA’s stated goals for the tech are. They want soldiers to be able to control prosthetic limbs with their minds and receive touch feedback from them, they want soldiers to be able to control drones with their minds, and they want soldiers to be able to receive video and audio feeds piped directly into their brains, NerveGear style, with no displays or headphones required. Literally, a little video (or a HUD) just appears in your field of vision, due to nanotransducers stimulating your visual cortex. That’s their stated goal.

The way neurons work actually is being deciphered very, very rapidly, and while decoding a neural pulse train in someone’s brain into something like text or readable information is still far off, it is only a matter of time before they map it with good enough accuracy to surmise what people are thinking based on neural impulses. People who think otherwise are underestimating the effects of big data. If they were to slip wireless BCIs into millions or billions of people, and compare what their neural data looks like while they’re making calls, texting people, writing forum posts, et cetera, then they would have enough information to train an AI that can take neural data and find its textual or audiovisual correlates.

 

[TheRomanSlayer]

Well, we know exactly what DARPA’s stated goals for the tech are. They want soldiers to be able to control prosthetic limbs with their minds and receive touch feedback from them, they want soldiers to be able to control drones with their minds, and they want soldiers to be able to receive video and audio feeds piped directly into their brains, NerveGear style, with no displays or headphones required. Literally, a little video (or a HUD) just appears in your field of vision, due to nanotransducers stimulating your visual cortex. That’s their stated goal.

So are they taking notes from the Gundam series regarding the mind being able to control remote weapons? This is some Newtype-level stuff that might sound out of place.

Here's something that I don't understand: with Bin Laden possessing those books listed above, why would Bin Laden go through the trouble of even getting those books, and how does he get them?

 

[Typhonis]

So how will they protect themselves when their systems crash due to something like this?

Carrington Event - Wikipedia

 

[Bacle]

So how will they protect themselves when their systems crash due to something like this?

Carrington Event - Wikipedia

Faraday caged back-ups and EMP hardened critical assets.

And unlike a nuke EMP, there is no radioactive fallout to content with during the recovery.

A Carrington event would fuck up a lot of things in the short term, but not badly enough to actually stop the likes of the WEF. In fact a Carrington event may give them cover to try pulling worse shit, because they would never let a crisis like that go to waste, though the global comms loss from the sat network getting fried might slow them down initially.

 

[LordsFire]

The pace of tech change is only accelerating; acting like this is too 'complicated' or 'not tested enough' to worry about is part of what groups like the WEF count on to keep people from fighting back against their BS on a large scale.

The future is going to look a lot like Ghost in the Shell, 1984, and Serenity/Firefly, and pretending that such stuff is too far off to worry about is foolish and why the asshole's keep winning.

What they keep finding, is 'the brain is actually way more complicated than we thought, and it's even harder to understand it than we thought.'

The rate of change in the field of 'mind machine interface' has gone from 'no change at all, because we can't do it at all,' to 'we have prosthetics that can somewhat reliably receive nerve signals.'

Effective back-and-forth communication between nerves and machines has not happened at all.

Cyberbrains are still purely the realm of science fiction, and probably will be for decades or centuries more. As a reminder, Ghost in the Shell has cyberbrains existing and going into widespread use by this current date.

1984, on the other hand, we arguably have already partially achieved that state.

 

[Bassoe]

So how will they protect themselves when their systems crash due to something like this?

Carrington Event - Wikipedia

Solar CMEs are like dinosaur-killer asteroids, something which would absolutely fuck civilization on a scale not seen since the bronze age collapse, but since the corporatocracy hasn't personally encountered one and the requite countermeasures (rebuilding all essential electronic infrastructure with faraday cages and the creation of proper space infrastructure) would be expensive, they're ignoring the risk. The good news of this is, if one did strike, they'd also be fucked, their best case scenario would be escaping to their New Zealand bunkers in time, then becoming feudal overlords with whatever firepower they had stashed therein and having to completely give up their dreams of world domination, the more plausible scenario, they'd be killed by their bodyguards for the keys to their bunkers as soon as their bank accounts became worthless.

The thing is, if you can manipulate people's emotional states, you can change their subjective value judgments over just about anything. It doesn't have to be anything really sophisticated, like deleting individual thoughts from people's heads, or controlling their limbs from afar, or anything like that. It can be something as simple and crude as giving them a slight boost to euphoria when they're watching a YouTube video of a political candidate that the Controllers like, or creating a sense of anxiety when they're watching a video of one they don't. Based on what I've seen, this is doable with current technology, and the possible scenarios for its use are limitless.

Questions:

• What's the power source? Say you've got these teeny chips inside people's brains, what're they running off? They're too small for long-term batteries or shielding for radioisotope thermoelectric generators like pacemakers and it isn't like people would be regularly standing inside giant induction chargers.
• How are they getting signals out? Again, tiny objects, no room for antenna of size sufficient to be of use and they're stuck in a mass of water and carbon compounds which will absorb radio waves and transmute them to heat.
• How are they targeted to the right portion of the brain (or the brain at all for that matter)? They're particles freely drifting in the bloodstream. Even if they're capable of passing through the blood-brain barrier, they're not guided. Pulsing an electrical charge through one to activate neurons surrounding it could be activating neurons in any portion of the brain. This seems like mechanism for killing people with seizures, not a mind control device.
• What's the point? Normies already carry their phones everywhere for tracking and can already be effortlessly brainwashed to believe anything the media says without requiring servitorization and the dissidents the corporatocracy would like to track and mind-control would be too paranoid to get the vaccination in the first place.

Point is, I can buy the existence of a conspiracy to enslave everyone with a reenactment of feudalism by way of company towns and to build a robot army to ensure the conspirators aren't betrayed by free-willed human bodyguards when they screw everyone who isn't them and that the conspirators would certainly like to enslave everyone with mind control brain chips because the conspirators will openly admit to those on their own webpages, but viable nanotechnology now is a step too far.

Mind control brain chips through non-nanotechnological means on the other hand are plausible, just harder to implement secretly due to the need for major brain surgery rather than injections.

So don't do it secretly.

Imagine a future in which capitalism makes being cybernetically augmented the new minimum standard for employment like collage degrees today. Nobody will hire anyone with merely baseline human capabilities because the cyborgs will be legitimately more capable and therefore, more profitable. Of course, said augmentation will contain all kinds of backdoor overrides, spyware, planned obsolesce, metabolic drug dependencies, etc, keeping its users permanently indebted to the megacorps selling and maintaining it. Company scrip that just barely pays for maintenance, a spyware link behind everyone's eyes and a remote shutoff for voluntary musculature to maintain monopoly of force. Or being perpetually unemployed and unemployable and receiving no social safety net since you chose to not seek employment and starving to death.

As a bonus from the corporatocratic perspective, that way makes the slaves pay to buy their own chains from you rather than outsourcing the cost to you.

 

[TheRomanSlayer]

Solar CMEs are like dinosaur-killer asteroids, something which would absolutely fuck civilization on a scale not seen since the bronze age collapse, but since the corporatocracy hasn't personally encountered one and the requite countermeasures (rebuilding all essential electronic infrastructure with faraday cages and the creation of proper space infrastructure) would be expensive, they're ignoring the risk. The good news of this is, if one did strike, they'd also be fucked, their best case scenario would be escaping to their New Zealand bunkers in time, then becoming feudal overlords with whatever firepower they had stashed therein and having to completely give up their dreams of world domination, the more plausible scenario, they'd be killed by their bodyguards for the keys to their bunkers as soon as their bank accounts became worthless.

Questions:

• What's the power source? Say you've got these teeny chips inside people's brains, what're they running off? They're too small for long-term batteries or shielding for radioisotope thermoelectric generators like pacemakers and it isn't like people would be regularly standing inside giant induction chargers.
• How are they getting signals out? Again, tiny objects, no room for antenna of size sufficient to be of use and they're stuck in a mass of water and carbon compounds which will absorb radio waves and transmute them to heat.
• How are they targeted to the right portion of the brain (or the brain at all for that matter)? They're particles freely drifting in the bloodstream. Even if they're capable of passing through the blood-brain barrier, they're not guided. Pulsing an electrical charge through one to activate neurons surrounding it could be activating neurons in any portion of the brain. This seems like mechanism for killing people with seizures, not a mind control device.
• What's the point? Normies already carry their phones everywhere for tracking and can already be effortlessly brainwashed to believe anything the media says without requiring servitorization and the dissidents the corporatocracy would like to track and mind-control would be too paranoid to get the vaccination in the first place.

Point is, I can buy the existence of a conspiracy to enslave everyone with a reenactment of feudalism by way of company towns and to build a robot army to ensure the conspirators aren't betrayed by free-willed human bodyguards when they screw everyone who isn't them and that the conspirators would certainly like to enslave everyone with mind control brain chips because the conspirators will openly admit to those on their own webpages, but viable nanotechnology now is a step too far.

Mind control brain chips through non-nanotechnological means on the other hand are plausible, just harder to implement secretly due to the need for major brain surgery rather than injections.

So don't do it secretly.

Imagine a future in which capitalism makes being cybernetically augmented the new minimum standard for employment like collage degrees today. Nobody will hire anyone with merely baseline human capabilities because the cyborgs will be legitimately more capable and therefore, more profitable. Of course, said augmentation will contain all kinds of backdoor overrides, spyware, planned obsolesce, metabolic drug dependencies, etc, keeping its users permanently indebted to the megacorps selling and maintaining it. Company scrip that just barely pays for maintenance, a spyware link behind everyone's eyes and a remote shutoff for voluntary musculature to maintain monopoly of force. Or being perpetually unemployed and unemployable and receiving no social safety net since you chose to not seek employment and starving to death.

As a bonus from the corporatocratic perspective, that way makes the slaves pay to buy their own chains from you rather than outsourcing the cost to you.

Cripes, that's a horrific perspective on the whole "jab vs job", only replace jab with chip. I wouldn't be surprised if there would be a new vocabulary introduced called "anti-chip" and "anti-chipper" in the same vein as "anti-vaxxer". The cyborgs would also be wired for complete and unquestionable obedience to their masters.

The problem with trying to resist mind control is, there is no confirmed method of how to resist it. Think of the scenarios from Red Alert 2 and Yuri's Revenge where a lot of people would come under a Psychic Beacon. Of course, the only way to avoid getting mind controlled is unfortunately to end up dead.

Speaking of which, what kind of concentration camp would be built for those humans with baseline capabilites, or the un-augmented ones?

 

[Bassoe]

The cyborgs would also be wired for complete and unquestionable obedience to their masters.

They wouldn't need to be. That's the whole point, there's no control per say, merely "if you don't make a profit, you can't afford replacement parts when your prosthetic vital organs wear out" and "prostheticorganscorp reserves the right to refuse to sell to you".

I like the idea of Cybermen going back to the 'life support' model. In fact, it could be used in a very special way to complete the "these are humans the Doctor will have to kill" idea.

Don't bother with Emotional Inhibitors. Have the person be fully aware of what they are and what they're doing... but have it so if they refuse orders from the Cyber Controller their life support suit will be shut down and they will die. The suit can then be reused with another brain.

You could then have an episode or story arc where the Doctor is gunning for the Cyber Controller. If he defeats/kills the Cyber Controller, then the cybermen will be free. No orders to disobey means no threat of their life support being shut down. They will still be trapped in a metal body, but they'll have freedom of choice.

The idea? Make it so the Cybermen have a completely understandable, relatable motive. No one cares if you kill an army of faceless robot drones whose only motive is "assimilate". Compare that with "what would you do if someone had a gun to your head and told you to do something horrible?"

Speaking of which, what kind of concentration camp would be built for those humans with baseline capabilites, or the un-augmented ones?

Again, there wouldn't need to be. Unemployment and lack of a social safety net kills just fine without requiring the expense of carrying out genocide, building weapons, employing death squads, etc. At most, send the cops, whether this means cyborgs with hand-me-down military equipment and the same implied threat of "obey or die of mechanical failures" as everyone else or the descendants of that sniper-rifle-robodog I keep posting articles about against "anti-chippers" who revolt rather than peacefully starving to death in accordance with the Non-Aggression Principle.