Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
Let's fucking go!
Election 2020 Election 2020: It's (almost) over! (maybe...possibly...ahh who are we kidding, it's 2020!)
- Thread starter Emperor Tippy
- Start date
Agent your going to have to get your own popcorn I only have enough for myself this time.
One whistleblower I watched detailed how someone had counted a batch (50 votes) 10 times. That one batch got counted at 500 votes.
Imagine them and others doing that all night, with mystery ballots showing up at 4am.
If 40 people did that once an hour, you could produce 480,000 votes.
You wouldn't need to even remove any Trump favored ones either. In a batch that say, favors Biden heavily by say, 40 out of 50, Trump would get 96,000 of those, but Biden would gain 384,000 votes. That's a near 4 to 1 advantage.
Also from same whistleblower:
There is a process where if a ballot can't be read by the machine, a democrat and republican each look it over and decide what it should be. She witnessed people who were both claiming to be democrats looking it over, and deciding the vote. No oversight.
Another thing that happened is that if the machine couldn't process the ballot, it would be duplicated at a table. Again. No oversight.
There is a process where if a ballot can't be read by the machine, a democrat and republican each look it over and decide what it should be. She witnessed people who were both claiming to be democrats looking it over, and deciding the vote. No oversight.
Another thing that happened is that if the machine couldn't process the ballot, it would be duplicated at a table. Again. No oversight.
Last edited:
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
I hope these whistleblowers don't get the "Clinton special".
They're likely safe.
If they end up mysteriously dead, that's just too suspicious.
As of now everyone can just say "well unless they have proof this is meaningless," and they have a point.
It'll be easy to dismiss the whistleblowers unless they have actual proof.
Archmagnus
Well-known member
They've already signed sworn affidavits. Even if they die, for any reason, those still will be applicable in court. Even better that applicable, since they couldn't be recanted or modified now.
You have to be a direct threat to the Clinton's to get that. This is a threat to Dominion.
We can make some at home, or I can pick some up at Dollarama, so it is good. Can get a normal bag of Smartfood for two dollars.
I guess that is what they meant by counting all votes, making sure that they really count.
And I can imagine that quite well, I think that experience has taught us this.
It seems like I need to read more into voter fraud, should be some articles on it on JSTOR or the like that I have access to. Anything else I should do? Because you have proven to me that I don't have enough of a clue of what is going on. Did read that old BBC article about fraud in Ghana was it? Was spooky in how applicable it was.
As our friend Rocinante said more or less, it would be too obvious. They aren't stupid enough, I hope, to make this any more blatant.
Calling it voter fraud isn't really accurate as it isn't a voter committing fraud or the like; this is election fraud.
Voting dead-grannies ballot is voter fraud. Ballot harvesting 25,000 people in nursing homes is election fraud.
And this is an election that appears to have everything: ballot box stuffing, necromantic voting, ballot harvesting, compromised tabulation machines, systemic legal violations, etc.
Basically, if you can think of a way to even theoretically cheat an election; it appears that the Democrats dove in with both feet this time around.
Election Fraud, got it. It is a difference of scale then? So a hundred dead voting Grannies is voter fraud, a hundred dead grannies per district is Election Fraud. Or am I misinterpreting what you are saying and that it isn't about scale, but about nature.
It is almost as if they want to be the very best at it, like no one ever was.
It's more trying to change the language.
Calling it voter fraud implies that it is a voter committing a fraud or that it is a fraud on the scale of voters.
Election Fraud is just much more honest because that it what is being done; defrauding the entire election.
Like this time around? Around four million currently recorded votes across the swing states are suspect.
Basically, voter fraud is highly unlikely to be able to materially impact an election (elections just don't end up close enough for a handful of ballots to matter). Election fraud is when you are hitting the scale where it really is moving the entire election.
Nature also plays a role as well, but it is mostly a scale difference. You simply can't ballot harvest 25,000 nursing home residents without an organization and resources behind you. At that point you are deliberately trying to rig the election.
As for being the best? This time around they are coming across as basically amateurs. I mean being frank this is just shoddy work, latin america, africa, or eastern europe would just laugh at it.
And Russia? What raised eyebrows in their last election wasn't that the data was Benford's Law compliant but that it was Benford's Law perfect out to four digits.
I really do think what made it so obvious this time around was the unexpected Trump turnout and how well he was doing in traditionally Dem precincts. That through off how they planned on rigging and they got sloppy.
Stuff like this makes me think we either could have or did take the House in addition to keeping the Senate, maybe even improving our hold on the Senate. I have no proof, but its something I keep thinking about.
He, to be fair, the Dems and their allies are trying to do a good impression of the Cardies in their propaganda and electoral fuckery.
Even there #MeToo bullshit and the Title IX stuff they pushed in colleges was almost like the Cardie 'justice' system.
We'll see as this all plays out.
The GA run-off election is the real thing to keep an eye on with regards to the Senate.