Election 2020 Election 2020: It's (almost) over! (maybe...possibly...ahh who are we kidding, it's 2020!)

Hey guys if you live in a suburban area or just outside of a big city. You might want to load up the old home defense gun just in case the leftist lose their damn minds and try to attack your house. I live in the rural countryside surrounded by veterans so not some much a problem for me. But I work in Ladson SC. So I will be packing my Hornady Critical Duty ammo in my 9mm just in case shit goes south near my job. Don't look to start violence but defend yourselves if attacked.

You sure you’re not afraid of the police arresting you for resisting?
 
Yes but aren't the Republicans winning that one?
Eh. There were a LOT of candidates so. The two biggest or the one who took over and is technically incumbent and the favorable dem.

The rep is amazing and she has fun with her tweets
 
I really do think what made it so obvious this time around was the unexpected Trump turnout and how well he was doing in traditionally Dem precincts. That through off how they planned on rigging and they got sloppy.

I suspect they expected a lower Trump turnout.

My guess-and this is obviously only a guess, is that they expected Joe Biden to tank it with Democrats. He had low in-party support. Lower than Clinton. Low in-party support is always a strong indicator that the Democrats are about to bite it. Especially when Trump had strong internal-party support. Playing it safe though, they would assume that he'd be able to pull the numbers he got last time.

I think they expected Trump had lost some support, just much less than they had. So if the plan went perfectly, then the media could announce that Trump had lost support in key battleground states, a "clear repudiation of his presidency" and present Biden with respectful numbers that would have beaten Trump regardless. And if Trump pulled the same numbers, then they'd still be able to argue strong Biden support.

The cover of COVID was perfect for the Dems to explain the irregularities of the election. They also had support from the bench in certain states, allowing them to change the rules at the last minute. And with RGB on SCOTUS, they could trust her to try and sway the Bushite globalist who would probably look the other way in order to be rid of Trump.

The first complication in the plan probably came with the riots. The Democrats seemed to have expected that Trump would be the one to suffer, but it turned out that they suffered too--considerably more as Pelosi and others called for an end to the violence one or two months ago. That wasn't good, but it wasn't a problem. They could make up those votes given their advance timeframe. The second and more crippling issue was the loss of RGB and Trump putting a new SCOTUS on the bench. And they couldn't delay this judge with the same slimy tactics without both pissing her off and alienating key votes they needed (women, Hispanics, Catholics). The third complication was I think, the second debate. Biden had gone on record with comments that alienated PA voters. The fourth complication was election night itself.

As it turns out, Trump not only retained his previous support in 2016, but he had actually gained substantial support. Not only were the Democrats not going to get their repudiation narrative, but they were also having difficulty catching Trump, let alone exceeding his count to stand above 1%.
 
Yes but aren't the Republicans winning that one?
With the ballot/electoral fuckery going on, do not take anything supposedly 'safe' GOP race or lead for granted.

That run-off is very critical to having a 'safe' GOP majority in the Senate, no matter what happens, and Harris becoming the 'tie-breaker' if the Bidens are able to cheat Biden into office and cheat enough for their candidate to win that election.
 
Stuff like this makes me think we either could have or did take the House in addition to keeping the Senate, maybe even improving our hold on the Senate. I have no proof, but its something I keep thinking about.

Well, if Trump can snag the presidency through proving this, your Republican party might have grounds to push further and who knows. Plus the recounts from Trump might help.
 
I suspect they expected a lower Trump turnout.

My guess-and this is obviously only a guess, is that they expected Joe Biden to tank it with Democrats. He had low in-party support. Lower than Clinton. Low in-party support is always a strong indicator that the Democrats are about to bite it. Especially when Trump had strong internal-party support. Playing it safe though, they would assume that he'd be able to pull the numbers he got last time.

I think they expected Trump had lost some support, just much less than they had. So if the plan went perfectly, then the media could announce that Trump had lost support in key battleground states, a "clear repudiation of his presidency" and present Biden with respectful numbers that would have beaten Trump regardless. And if Trump pulled the same numbers, then they'd still be able to argue strong Biden support.

The cover of COVID was perfect for the Dems to explain the irregularities of the election. They also had support from the bench in certain states, allowing them to change the rules at the last minute. And with RGB on SCOTUS, they could trust her to try and sway the Bushite globalist who would probably look the other way in order to be rid of Trump.

The first complication in the plan probably came with the riots. The Democrats seemed to have expected that Trump would be the one to suffer, but it turned out that they suffered too--considerably more as Pelosi and others called for an end to the violence one or two months ago. That wasn't good, but it wasn't a problem. They could make up those votes given their advance timeframe. The second and more crippling issue was the loss of RGB and Trump putting a new SCOTUS on the bench. And they couldn't delay this judge with the same slimy tactics without both pissing her off and alienating key votes they needed (women, Hispanics, Catholics). The third complication was I think, the second debate. Biden had gone on record with comments that alienated PA voters. The fourth complication was election night itself.

As it turns out, Trump not only retained his previous support in 2016, but he had actually gained substantial support. Not only were the Democrats not going to get their repudiation narrative, but they were also having difficulty catching Trump, let alone exceeding his count to stand above 1%.
Just to satisfy my curiosity, but might the thought « Trump supporters are all uneducated hick » gone into the planning?
Because if it does turn out to be true, it certainly look like they expected everyone to be too stupid to notice and investigate irregularities.
 
Just to satisfy my curiosity, but might the thought « Trump supporters are all uneducated hick » gone into the planning?
Because if it does turn out to be true, it certainly look like they expected everyone to be too stupid to notice and investigate irregularities.


They're very open about thinking that. Well, quite a few are.
 
What do you know, getting interviewed by the USPS Office of the Inspector General is stressful? Being put on emergency placement is standard in this kind of circumstances. He'll get back pay unless he's actually completely fucked up.

If he recanted as some say, Veritas is going to get this guy in a load of trouble. If the recording is his, and he didn't get permission for it, he's doubly screwed.


Ah just wanted to give you a heads up. But I know Revan pretty well, and chances are he wont get your message for at least a few months. As he'll likely not be online for a while. Just felt the need to tell you.
 
The Whistleblower Richard Hopkins didn’t recant, the article from the Washington Post got debunked By both Richard Hopkins and Project Veritas About that issue.

Did you listen to the recording?

He admitted that he signed an affidavit written by Veritas' lawyers, and that he "would not swear" to that affidavit again. He then wrote out a new one in which he said he overheard a partial conversation and was told to give ballots to his supervisor, and he assumed that meant they were being backdated.

He was then told by the OIG agent that the agency would control what was released. He gave the recording to Veritas. Bluntly, he's toast for that.
 


If New York went Red they may not get a lockdown?


Erm, no?

I mean, the guy could do another quarantine and make it appear the place is solidly Blue, regardless

And those with louder and definitely far more aggressive voices and willingness to do some really WTF shit, may successfully bully the rest of the non-connected population into compliance

IF they truly go Red.....I don’t think a Civil War would occur but enough “Just let me go to my grandma’s place!!!” sorts of stuff and police giving up
 
Erm, no?

I mean, the guy could do another quarantine and make it appear the place is solidly Blue, regardless

And those with louder and definitely far more aggressive voices and willingness to do some really WTF shit, may successfully bully the rest of the non-connected population into compliance

IF they truly go Red.....I don’t think a Civil War would occur but enough “Just let me go to my grandma’s place!!!” sorts of stuff and police giving up
If it went red wouldn't he be replaced?
 
A little too confident there

I mean I’m pretty sure they will never allow Trump or ANYONE remotely like him around in power ever again

If they have a Republican President it would be a guy like Romney who may both concede or actively help their plans

That is a definitely possibility, Trump by his nature is a threat to the elites, and their power. And if they lose power they are fucked. The USA as a country was supposed to be about the elite sharing power with other segments of society, but this is many modern countries as well including Canada, the UK, etc. And the elites have broken their side of the bargain.

Maybe after they are done with America they'll let Mittens have a spin with it, and he'll strap the USA to the roof of his car.
 


Apparently he's going for a backup?

I'm considering the chance he could lose.

I listen to many sources.
We are only 8 days out from the election at this point, and in 2000 it took 37 days to deal with just Florida's issues.

It is way too early for this sort of talk from his campaign, so that sort of stuff is very likely disinformation/misinformation being spread by the MSM to demoralize Trump's supporters/the GOP by making him seem less confident in winning this election.

Trump has at least 4 paths to winning right now, as Tippy detailed earlier. Citing MSM sources doing their damnest to demoralize Trump supporters and suppress news about the mounting evidence of election fraud that is being found gives the enemy (and the MSM is the enemy of Trump and his base, as much as the American people as a whole) ad revenue and exposure.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top