You can be non-interventionist without parroting outright Chinese-Russian propaganda, which is what the Libertarian Party is seeming to do in those posts
Given that the Ukraine war is a mess of confusion for anyone being slightly honest, you are likely going to end up saying some propaganda if you take any side. The Libertarians have never been pro Putin, just they've also been anti-Zelensky. Personally, I don't have a problem with Zelensky, but I get their issues. The dude is constantly asking for interventions and money,
which he should be doing, but America shouldn't be giving. It's sorta like blaming the person on welfare for the welfare system existing.
As for Chinese propaganda, not really, no. Like I'm sure you can find some libertarians that have this stupid ass opinion, but then every large enough group has idiots. For the particular point about genocide, it's not falling for propaganda if you insist that it exists, and is bad, and should stop, just refuse to call it genocide.
And it's still moronic on their part, and you're an idiot for defending them.
Calling it not a genocide is simply the LPNH & Mises Caucus being very consistent wrt what they call a genocide. They don't consider Japanese internment or the American Indian reeducation programs genocide either. I consider the second one genocide, not the first, which allows me to call the China stuff a genocide, though it has its issues (if you introduce an amazon tribe to the modern world and they want to leave and abandon their culture, does that count? etc.). Basically, any bar can be attacked, so find your line and come up with the reasons your line is good, apply it equally, and be open to changing the definition upon being challenged.
Why do they harp on it? Because war propaganda should generally be resisted. And that is what the MSM's harping on this is. South Africa is going Fascist again (socialism with race swapped for class), and we never hear about it in the MSM. We hear about Chinese oppression of the Uighurs in the MSM (one of the biggest early reports was in the NYT) because they want us to dislike China.
Why? I'd blame the MIC, but that would be wrong here. It's more that some just love war. And why am I saying war in particular? Because no one in power actually solving the problem, using solutions the US has done before. When the Jews were harrassed in the USSR, the US opened their doors to them. We didn't do that to the Hong Kongers, we aren't doing that to the Uighurs, and that's something we
should do, but won't. Because those in power don't want the Uighurs to escape, they want the Uighurs to be egg they shove in China's face.
So maybe don't criticize the party for immigration of
actual refugees from communist countries because they aren't using the right label.