No.
The WWI Conspiracy
Edit: Sorry,
@DarthOne I didn't mean to quote you, but the post below yours.
I somehow feel that the people involved in this documentary have only a foggy notion of what they're talking about. Even a cursory glance shows that they base their thesis on the work of people such as Richard Grove, or TragedyAndHope.com -- who himself presents a very muddled re-interpretation of a thesis actually put forward by Quigley, in the rather more well-researched (and considerably less sensationalist) book after whose title that website is named:
Tragedy and Hope.
I've actually read Quigley's work, so I don't have to rely on third-hand regurgitations, which don't strike me as altogether credible. In fact, rather amusingly, my own position on the matter partially informed by the arguments put forth in
Tragedy and Hope. Not that this is saintly; Quigley was the 'court historian' of the Kennedy White House, after all, and the favourite professor of none other than Bill Clinton. But I find it funny that this whole documentary is based on re-tellings of Quigley's account, when Quigley himself was actually pretty
positive about the "Anglo-American establishment" and its various accomplishments.