United States Biden administration policies and actions - megathread

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
I'm not saying its gaslighting i'm more along the lines of "So what if they take Ukraine?" Like why should I care how does that affect me?
Its a bit more complicated. Ukraine is not in NATO and probably won't be. NATO and USA have no duty to protect it.
What is the problem is that Russia is getting quite imperial ideas about doing business in Europe.
The question is not whether Russia takes Ukraine, the question is if Russia pays enough of a price for trying to take Ukraine, win or loss, to reconsider its ambitions and way of doing things.
 

49ersfootball

Well-known member
Its a bit more complicated. Ukraine is not in NATO and probably won't be. NATO and USA have no duty to protect it.
What is the problem is that Russia is getting quite imperial ideas about doing business in Europe.
The question is not whether Russia takes Ukraine, the question is if Russia pays enough of a price for trying to take Ukraine, win or loss, to reconsider its ambitions and way of doing things.
In other words: Ukraine will NEVER be allowed to join NATO ?

Putin cannot live forever.
 

Carrot of Truth

War is Peace
Its a bit more complicated. Ukraine is not in NATO and probably won't be. NATO and USA have no duty to protect it.
What is the problem is that Russia is getting quite imperial ideas about doing business in Europe.
The question is not whether Russia takes Ukraine, the question is if Russia pays enough of a price for trying to take Ukraine, win or loss, to reconsider its ambitions and way of doing things.

I mean I don't think Russia can take and hold Ukraine without a heavy cost but for the sake of argument lets say everything goes right for them, Then what? Like Ukraine isn't exactly prime real estate or anything. Like how does the US benefit from potentially starting WW3 from any of that? Like will we each get a share of the plunder from said war? No probably not so I literally see no point in going to war for someone who isn't even an ally.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
In other words: Ukraine will NEVER be allowed to join NATO ?

Putin cannot live forever.
More likely, Ukraine won't be willing to do the things it would need to do in order to be allowed into NATO (like, say, dropping claims to Crimea). But if it does go such a long way, all bets are off.
I mean I don't think Russia can take and hold Ukraine without a heavy cost but for the sake of argument lets say everything goes right for them, Then what? Like Ukraine isn't exactly prime real estate or anything. Like how does the US benefit from potentially starting WW3 from any of that? Like will we each get a share of the plunder from said war? No probably not so I literally see no point in going to war for someone who isn't even an ally.
Its a lot of real estate and people, and some strategic significance, like more control over Black Sea and land connection to contested territory of Transnistria, which in turn can cause problems for Romania, NATO member, and Moldova, NATO candidate, nevermind add direct Russia border to several NATO countries.
Long story short, it would be much cheaper to break, or at least mire Russia's military in Ukraine, than wait for it to start messing with more vulnerable NATO members in several different points from Scandinavia to Turkey, which, if emboldened by a major success in Ukraine, it may well do.
 

Whitestrake Pelinal

Like a dream without a dreamer
And frankly this attitude disgusts me. It is both entirely self-centered as well as short-sighted.
A substantial chunk of Ukraine seems more interested in being Russia than Ukraine, judging by the last half-decade of fighting.

With only a handful of exceptions, the European nations have not acted like Russian aggression was problem -- they have done little to nothing to restore their armed forces to fully funded states.

America involving ourselves in this matter is retarded, and the constant push by globohomo to shove NATO right up to Russia's doorstep is obvious warmongering. It's analagous to the USSR staging nukes in Cuba, which they wisely backed off from. America has fought many needless conflicts in the last half century, it's time for a change of course.
 

49ersfootball

Well-known member
More likely, Ukraine won't be willing to do the things it would need to do in order to be allowed into NATO (like, say, dropping claims to Crimea). But if it does go such a long way, all bets are off.

Its a lot of real estate and people, and some strategic significance, like more control over Black Sea and land connection to contested territory of Transnistria, which in turn can cause problems for Romania, NATO member, and Moldova, NATO candidate, nevermind add direct Russia border to several NATO countries.
Long story short, it would be much cheaper to break, or at least mire Russia's military in Ukraine, than wait for it to start messing with more vulnerable NATO members in several different points from Scandinavia to Turkey, which, if emboldened by a major success in Ukraine, it may well do.
What are the requirements of joining NATO 🤔 ?
 

Whitestrake Pelinal

Like a dream without a dreamer
Excuse me, but when exactly has NATO ever started a conflict with Russia, or invaded a nation to claim its territory?
Warmongering is not limited to those two actions, so it's not a pertinent question -- unless you're trying to establish a strawman argument to attack, of course.

Examples of NATO warmongering include the second invasion of Iraq, the use of missile strikes for assassination in multiple states, the incitement of color revolutions in multiple states, and the establishment of "no fly zones" over states in which NATO aircraft attack and destroy the air force of the occupied state.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Warmongering is not limited to those two actions, so it's not a pertinent question -- unless you're trying to establish a strawman argument to attack, of course.

Examples of NATO warmongering include the second invasion of Iraq, the use of missile strikes for assassination in multiple states, the incitement of color revolutions in multiple states, and the establishment of "no fly zones" over states in which NATO aircraft attack and destroy the air force of the occupied state.
Seems like you are talking about actions of America and coalitions it formed for certain purposes which happened to include some NATO countries, rather than NATO itself.
What are the requirements of joining NATO 🤔 ?
This:
Plus for practical purposes, not being in an active or barely frozen territorial conflict for common sense reasons - if a country like that was admitted, it would mean immediate article 5, which means someone, or more likely many someones among current membership would veto it.
 

Whitestrake Pelinal

Like a dream without a dreamer
Seems like you are talking about actions of America and coalitions it formed for certain purposes which happened to include some NATO countries, rather than NATO itself.
"It wasn't our whole alliance, it was just some of our members" is not an argument I can imagine Russia giving any credence, and for good reason. America is the de facto guarantor of NATO agreements, the primary military power in the alliance, the primary economic power in the alliance, and we have also been the primary warmonger.
 

prinCZess

Warrior, Writer, Performer, Perv
"It wasn't our whole alliance, it was just some of our members" is not an argument I can imagine Russia giving any credence, and for good reason. America is the de facto guarantor of NATO agreements, the primary military power in the alliance, the primary economic power in the alliance, and we have also been the primary warmonger.
*Looks at Chechnya, Georgia...Recent Kazakhstan*
That rather transparently looks like the old Russian reversal tale. The only difference being Russia's sphere of influence slash capacity to garner friends to go haring off into military expeditions isn't as great.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
"It wasn't our whole alliance, it was just some of our members" is not an argument I can imagine Russia giving any credence, and for good reason. America is the de facto guarantor of NATO agreements, the primary military power in the alliance, the primary economic power in the alliance, and we have also been the primary warmonger.
Some states that were members and some that weren't. In Libya, Jordan, Qatar, Sweden and UAE also took part. Also blame UN for giving virtue signallers an excuse.
In Iraq, Australia also took part.
In Syria, in the end Russia should be more concerned about Iran\Hezbollah competing over influence there because that's what they are doing :D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top