If we get Trump again, or someone willing to listen to him, we would basically tell them either release them or face a quick destruction, and threaten Pakistan as well
So there are a couple big problems with that...
1) The Taliban could just go "Fuck you" and immediately kill every hostage they have. Which ends the hostage crisis, sure, but in a way that would immediately backfire and make Biden look like a genius. Rule #1 in hostage negotiations is you don't do anything that puts the hostages at further risk of harm.
2) Going to war with Afghanistan again because we fucked up is not going to be popular with the American public. They're pissed off at Biden, but launching a full-scale war four years after the evacuation fuckup is not going to be popular, especially when all it does is result in more dead American hostages. You know, the thing we really want to prevent?
3) Pakistan has nukes. Whether they'd slip one to al-Qaeda or the Taliban is unknown, but if we threaten them with annihilation I can think of plenty of elements in their country that would go "You know what, fuck America" and either sneak a nuke into a major American city or else hit a nearby target like Diego Garcia or even somewhere in India out of spite.
Threatening to do mean things isn't actually an effective negotiating tactic. Threatening outright war with countries that aren't overtly* hostile is also a really good way to get one's ass voted out of office in the next election if not impeached.
Trying the "tough guy" approach sounds nice and all, bur reality has a way of intruding on such things. I get you're still young and don't understand these things, but maybe consider that there's some very good reasons that no serious individual on the right is suggesting we actually do this, because the Law of Unintended Consequences is a very real and very unforgiving thing.