United States Biden administration policies and actions - megathread

ATP

Well-known member
Waiting for the next foreign policy crisis to explode: Poland & Ukraine both are nervous!
Why? smart people in Poland always knew,that USA would either sold us to Russia/Republicans/ or gave us for free/Democrats/ .Bided did what any other democrats would do in his shoes.
But - it is not 1990,we just need to become China vassal instead of USA to survive.Pity,i prefered USA.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member

The Taliban have hostages.
and this has now turned into the carter 2.0 situation.
Clown world Carter with genuine clown hostages.
Seriously, why are NGOs like this?
Get their people into an obviously stupid situation against the advice of everyone sane, and when the inevitable happens, expect the government to bail them out of it.
What's more ridiculous in this situation than usual, this time they are handing that rotten egg to an administration they like.
 

almostinsane

Well-known member
Clown world Carter with genuine clown hostages.
Seriously, why are NGOs like this?
Get their people into an obviously stupid situation against the advice of everyone sane, and when the inevitable happens, expect the government to bail them out of it.
What's more ridiculous in this situation than usual, this time they are handing that rotten egg to an administration they like.

More blood equals more virtue.

Of course, they forget that true martyrs are tough sons of bitches that knew what they were getting into. When Christians were fed to lions, they were stoic and died professing what they believe in.

Earned admiration from a martial society.

NGOs pawns screech, "Noo!!!! This is inhumane!!!!"

And they earn contempt from everyone watching.
 

Airedale260

Well-known member
And once 2024 hits and a new pres, will it be like with Reagan and they release or what?

No. Carter and Co actually did a ton of work on getting them freed, and EVERYBODY was pissed at the Iranians: The Soviets didn’t like them, the Chinese didn’t like them, the rest of the Middle East didn’t like them, Western Europe didn’t like them, etc.

The hostages in Iran were actual diplomats; the same situation doesn’t apply here. And unless whoever is president in 2025 is actually willing to throw down in Afghanistan, we can’t really force them to hand over every American in country.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
No. Carter and Co actually did a ton of work on getting them freed, and EVERYBODY was pissed at the Iranians: The Soviets didn’t like them, the Chinese didn’t like them, the rest of the Middle East didn’t like them, Western Europe didn’t like them, etc.

The hostages in Iran were actual diplomats; the same situation doesn’t apply here. And unless whoever is president in 2025 is actually willing to throw down in Afghanistan, we can’t really force them to hand over every American in country.
If we get Trump again, or someone willing to listen to him, we would basically tell them either release them or face a quick destruction, and threaten Pakistan as well
 

Airedale260

Well-known member
If we get Trump again, or someone willing to listen to him, we would basically tell them either release them or face a quick destruction, and threaten Pakistan as well

So there are a couple big problems with that...

1) The Taliban could just go "Fuck you" and immediately kill every hostage they have. Which ends the hostage crisis, sure, but in a way that would immediately backfire and make Biden look like a genius. Rule #1 in hostage negotiations is you don't do anything that puts the hostages at further risk of harm.

2) Going to war with Afghanistan again because we fucked up is not going to be popular with the American public. They're pissed off at Biden, but launching a full-scale war four years after the evacuation fuckup is not going to be popular, especially when all it does is result in more dead American hostages. You know, the thing we really want to prevent?

3) Pakistan has nukes. Whether they'd slip one to al-Qaeda or the Taliban is unknown, but if we threaten them with annihilation I can think of plenty of elements in their country that would go "You know what, fuck America" and either sneak a nuke into a major American city or else hit a nearby target like Diego Garcia or even somewhere in India out of spite.

Threatening to do mean things isn't actually an effective negotiating tactic. Threatening outright war with countries that aren't overtly* hostile is also a really good way to get one's ass voted out of office in the next election if not impeached.

Trying the "tough guy" approach sounds nice and all, bur reality has a way of intruding on such things. I get you're still young and don't understand these things, but maybe consider that there's some very good reasons that no serious individual on the right is suggesting we actually do this, because the Law of Unintended Consequences is a very real and very unforgiving thing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top