Uh oh. Kamala's been greasing her palms with book sales...
Uh oh. Kamala's been greasing her palms with book sales...
That fits with all the other data that correlates mental health and happiness to political alignment. Republicans and Conservatives tend to be happier and suffer fewer mental health issues than Democrats and Progressives. This makes a degree of sense when you think about it in a meta-sense, if you are happy and content with your current situation, would you really want there to be any major changes made? No, of course not. Happy, content people are, in many ways, naturally (little "c") conservative. If you are unhappy and discontent with your present lot, well, you're want to change things, right? So unhappy and discontent people will want change.You fucking can't!
Incredibly enough, if you look at the breakdown of psychiatric troubles and check the political section you'll find something shocking: the least troubled group according to this poll are young republicans. Countless hours spent panicking about the "Trump cult" and yet it's young democrats that feel more tired, depressed, and hopeless by varying margins despite their guy being in the white house. Doubtlessly the wiser people here can better wrap their heads around this.
That fits with all the other data that correlates mental health and happiness to political alignment. Republicans and Conservatives tend to be happier and suffer fewer mental health issues than Democrats and Progressives. This makes a degree of sense when you think about it in a meta-sense, if you are happy and content with your current situation, would you really want there to be any major changes made? No, of course not. Happy, content people are, in many ways, naturally (little "c") conservative. If you are unhappy and discontent with your present lot, well, you're want to change things, right? So unhappy and discontent people will want change.
Just because the person in the White House has changed doesn't alter this underlying fact. The person in the White House does very little to impact the day to day happiness and contentment of an individual, heck, national level politics does very little to do that. What build personal contentment and happiness is good relationships, lack of worry about where you next meal and such comes from and generally from fullfilling the basic hierarchy of needs, which are best addressed not by involvement in national politics, but by having a stable job, being married, raising kids, and being involved in social groups and organizations like Churches and such. If you note that's a list of things that, well, young people generally aren't involved with as much and take time to develop once out of school... and also things that tend to be much more common for people on the Right than the Left.
Looks like this was just the Post being the Post. The story's author resigned, claiming "The Kamala Harris story — an incorrect story I was ordered to write and which I failed to push back hard enough against — was my breaking point."Uh oh. Kamala's been greasing her palms with book sales...
Is that the national average? Because if so I am beyond any redemption...I have to wonder how McDonald's and their ilk feel about people eating only one hamburger per month
It's a predicted limit that would happen if we started taking actions to hit Biden's climate goals.Is that the national average? Because if so I am beyond any redemption...
That fits with all the other data that correlates mental health and happiness to political alignment. Republicans and Conservatives tend to be happier and suffer fewer mental health issues than Democrats and Progressives. This makes a degree of sense when you think about it in a meta-sense, if you are happy and content with your current situation, would you really want there to be any major changes made? No, of course not. Happy, content people are, in many ways, naturally (little "c") conservative. If you are unhappy and discontent with your present lot, well, you're want to change things, right? So unhappy and discontent people will want change.
Young people are politically engaged, pro-Biden, and depressed, study finds - The Boston Globe
A new youth poll conducted by the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics found young millennials and members of Gen Z far more likely to be politically engaged than their predecessors.www.bostonglobe.com
First time?
Well screw that! I guess I will just have to get my livestock butchered a little more...It's a predicted limit that would happen if we started taking actions to hit Biden's climate goals.
The prediction is that the livestock market would have to cut wayyyyy back.
It's not a specific part of any of his plans as far as I can tell. But the prediction is 4 lbs of beef a year.
Which is around how much I eat in a week lol
A non smoker here myself and I was and am against every policy you just brought up.It was shitty enough when they did this to vape juices (believe that was under Trump? Maybe Obama?).
And doubly shitty when they raised the smoking age to 21 under Trump.
Now Biden admin. carries on the legacy of...just kind of being dickheads to a demographic skewed heavily lower-class.
Because, apparently, having things you enjoy that are bad for you is unacceptable to the people in Congress and DC.
Even as a nonsmoker...This stuff needs to get bent.
On bright side? It occurs to me that you could burn big bags of mint as a part of a protest, and it would make things smell nice. I think?
. . . Weed smells WAY worse than tobacco, especially if you're dealing with pipe or cigar tobacco.I'm not just a non smoker. I find it fucking revolting and the smell is atrocious. I still am against this. (But I like weed lol)
It isn't the smell, more of the effects. . . Weed smells WAY worse than tobacco, especially if you're dealing with pipe or cigar tobacco.
I never said it made him a fascist. I said denying people the vote based on political preference was something I'm only aware of communist and fascist governments doing. And, no he's not stating his opposition to letting the opposition get there way. He was literally asked, do you think it's only a problem because they'd vote democrat, and he said yes.
It's a terrible prediction that ignores the environmental impact of all food production besides beef. Eating less beef and more plant-based food like soy would actually cause more damage to the environment, not less.It's a predicted limit that would happen if we started taking actions to hit Biden's climate goals.
The prediction is that the livestock market would have to cut wayyyyy back.
It's not a specific part of any of his plans as far as I can tell. But the prediction is 4 lbs of beef a year.
Which is around how much I eat in a week lol
They dint know thatIt's a terrible prediction that ignores the environmental impact of all food production besides beef. Eating less beef and more plant-based food like soy would actually cause more damage to the environment, not less.
Of course they don't know; knowing would require thinking, and the regressive left are more about feeling than anything else. They feel that cracking down on cattle farming would help the environment; therefor, it will.They dint know that
They think it would make methane go down and only that
SighOf course they don't know; knowing would require thinking, and the regressive left are more about feeling than anything else. They feel that cracking down on cattle farming would help the environment; therefor, it will.