Yes, thank you for a perfect example of someone who doesn't know what an ancap is, and thinks that AnCap = greedy. The money to pay this is coming from US tax dollars, which are all stolen. Stealing money is not anCap compatible. And that's ignoring how often the weapons are used to kill innocents.
No, I do believe there was legitimate unhappiness. But the US assistence was also there. 'Helping' an actual organic belief is more efficient. But the US was still there, doing shit. Which is wrong, btw.
Given that the corporate media does the bidding of the intel agencies of the US, this isn't much of an argument, though I will say I see the difference, I could see how Russia wouldn't.
Hasn't for a very long while. The only reason it lined up was because pouring money into a pit and lighting it on fire, knowing that the USSR had to do the same, was a legitimate military tactic vs actual, practicing communists, as our communism of handing out government contracts was orders of magnitude less onerous than theirs. But now that it isn't, as we aren't facing anyone practicing a command economy but the Norks, it's now back to being a waste of money to waste money.
See, there is no other option. Someone will own the foreign policy, and it won't be 'the common good'. It'll either be people saying leave me alone, got mine, or people saying "we can kill kids for cash". I know which I'll choose.