LordsFire
Internet Wizard
Russia went from being a feared Military Power to a Laughing Stock Military Power in less than a year.
It's what happens when you don't even realize that you're bluffing, but someone else calls said bluff anyways.
Russia went from being a feared Military Power to a Laughing Stock Military Power in less than a year.
Uhm, akshualy I think you'll find they're rightly feared more than ever before my cutsie-poopsie muffin. I have a news article from some random reporter in Angola, an official release from the russian MoD, and a quote from Zelensky (Ignore the ellipsis!) to prove it.Russia went from being a feared Military Power to a Laughing Stock Military Power in less than a year.
I'm definitely flattered, but unfortunately I prefer women and not catching AIDs from the likes of you.
Russia and China, with the U.S. only having one successful test so far. Would you like to try again, or should I already accept this is just a lot of bark and no bite from you?
Thank you for contradicting your own argument, in that this is to concede the U.S./NATO advantage is not overwhelming;
it's too dependent on the specific political contexts therein
It also does pass the common sense test of why Russia would continue to sign an unfavorable treaty
Do you have a link to an actual news source quoting an actual press release by an actual national government, as opposed to some literally fucking who on Twatter providing no links to anything?Lots of cute words and delusions, immediately followed by the U.S. showing how all of that is completely wrong with them directly rejecting Ukraine's membership:
If the U.S. and its allies, according to you, has overwhelming nuclear and conventional overmatch, why not? NATO has forces in the region and if they are as great as you say, then there is no reason not to intervene
Indeed, the Pentagon itself is expecting the war to go on for many months, meaning vastly higher losses to the Ukrainian military and civilian population. If NATO could end this quickly, why don't they? They'd get the added prestige bonus of further humiliating Russia, according to you.
Very curious, then, that they don't do that, reject Ukraine's NATO membership and make statements about how they want to avoid war with Russia.
No trying is required to effortlessly pick apart your arguments; do better Sweetie.
I think it's adorable how desperate you are for my attention, and it is flattering how much I live in your head rent free, but my girlfriend and work get first dibs. Sorry dear
That's a funny way of saying you bitched out replying to my last post, and it's clear to see why you did:
No trying is required to effortlessly pick apart your arguments; do better Sweetie.
I mean, as long as yall contuine the weapons I don't think thr world actually cares.
I do somewhat hope your country understands that the money it is sending is going to go towards killing a lot of people, civilians included
I can not tell you how much I appreciate every one of your posts. I wish I had the time and attention span to do what you do, but I'm glad someone is making more of an effort than me to point these things out. I ran out of fucks to give HL quite a while back and now just randomly shout at him.-Snip-
I have the feeling that you vastly under-estimate the amount of free time I have to spend on petty pissing matches with halfwits.
I double-majored in Journalism and Poli-Sci. I was born to drive Dunning-Kruger test-cases like you before me like cattle before the herders.
-Snip-
I ran out of fucks to give HL quite a while back and now just randomly shout at him.
Temporary measure, I'd venture, to support the Russian blitzkrieg, to support the advance of the Ghost Division ...That idea they had about using a ship as a bridge support is gonna backfire.
I quoted this section so you more easily recognize your error when discussing Russia ops.No, the smart thing would be...
I quoted this section so you more easily recognize your error when discussing Russia ops.
Anyone knows if Ukraine plans to cross the border into Russia?
If there are plans, they're not talking about it. I stress "IF".
…..a ship.
Ships carry cargo. They are not (usually) designed to be load-bearing supports for concrete-and-steel two-lane bridges. Even if anchored, a ship will drift ever slightly depending on ocean currents. Then you have shifting ocean tides that causes the ship to raise and fall ever so slightly on a regular basis.
No, the smart thing would be to shut down the whole damn bridge and have inspectors go over every inch of the affected area, especially the support columns to make sure those didn't get damaged, weakened, etc.. That can take anywhere from several days to weeks depending on the circumstances. Then comes the fun part with the repairs...and this is just covering the traffic bridge, mind you. They need to analyze the damage to the rail bridge, and will probably need to replace that section of the rails as it looks like they got partially melted and weakened from the intense fire. The same phenomenon happened on 9/11 when the intense fire and heat from the crashed airliners and their fuel caused the metal girders to weaken on the Twin Towers causing the complete collapse. (Please spare any conspiracy BS about that here, take that to another thread.)
What could possibly go wrong here….?
EDIT: A bit more info on the rail bridge before the explosion.
And after:
If there aren't plans then the Urkainian planning staff aren't doing their jobs.
I'm confident they don't plan to invade this year, but if Putin hasn't been couped by the spring campaigning season the war just isn't going to end without one side dictating terms in the other's capital. I'd rather it by Ukraine dictating terms in Moscow.
I really hope you are wrong.I expect Ukraine to go into Crimea as well as attempt isolate Russia from the neighboring coastlines.
Depends on what you define as 'the border' and 'crossing it'.Anyone knows if Ukraine plans to cross the border into Russia?
I expect Ukraine to go into Crimea as well as attempt isolate Russia from the neighboring coastlines.
Ukraine want's it's 2014 borders back, and it has the ability to get that thanks to the weapons it has now.I really hope you are wrong.
Depends on what you define as 'the border' and 'crossing it'.
Ukraine isn't going to march on Moscow or St. Petersburg. However, they also won't let Russia fire across the 2014 border without attempting to neutralize the unit's doing so.
Ukraine want's it's 2014 borders back, and it has the ability to get that thanks to the weapons it has now.
All that has to happen for fighting to end is for Russia to leave Ukraine and stop firing across the 2014 borders.
Russian troops are going to be removed from all the lands they have illegally occupied in Ukraine.