Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

paulobrito

Well-known member
The 65nm one is lab experiment scale.
Sorry to disappoint you, but they are at 28nm on lab experiment scale, 65nm is already in the production phase. Probably, low or very low (initial) production phase, but is another phase already.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
I don't want to write long answers in English so I use a pretty good but sometimes problematic translator (not Google).
He mistranslated the word (Kumplować) that is "To mate" .

Strange? We just keep wondering how the hell it happened. But it did.

Interesting.

Anyway, did Poland try complaining about this in, say, EU courts?
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Sorry to disappoint you, but they are at 28nm on lab experiment scale, 65nm is already in the production phase. Probably, low or very low (initial) production phase, but is another phase already.
Where did you get that info?
 

Batrix2070

RON/PLC was a wonderful country.
Anyway, did Poland try complaining about this in, say, EU courts?
That's what I can't tell you anymore, because I don't remember. Although looking at who was in power at the time and how much they considered Germany a strategic partner. I would be surprised if they did and tried in earnest.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
You guys might enjoy this:

An animated map of the 2014 Donbass War (Donbass separatists = red; Ukraine = yellow):

4ee83238d447854b8ceeaecbd545f8562a7971e7.webp
 

WolfBear

Well-known member

That's what I can't tell you anymore, because I don't remember. Although looking at who was in power at the time and how much they considered Germany a strategic partner. I would be surprised if they did and tried in earnest.

How much did they consider Germany to be a strategic partner?
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Chechen TikTok Battalion has Returned!



Now they just need some female members! Hijabi Chechen Tik-Tok fighters! Or is that Hoejabi Chechen Tik-Tok fighters? ;) Anyway, I suspect that Chechens are some serious horndogs lol! :D

3fe3186d159558002287099e49a5c4da95426cb9.jpg


(Interestingly enough, this fundie horndog business is quite interesting lol :D: Young women told to pack sexy underwear before joining ISIS )

BTW, interesting question: Why have things such as corruption and targeted killings been more entrenched in the East Slavic countries than in the rest of ex-Communist Eastern Europe? The Baltic countries were also a part of the Soviet Union, but they are considerably less corrupt than the East Slavic countries are, and also probably have much less targeted killings, I suspect. The fact that Russia and Belarus are dictatorships might have something to do with this, but more journalists were actually killed in Russia under Yeltsin than under Putin:


And Ukraine is a democratic country and yet also had strange occurrences in the past such as Viktor Yushchenko's poisoning and this man's killing:


And of course the killing of Oles Buzina as well:


Here's a map of European corruption, FWIW:

corruption-perceptions-index-2016.jpg
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
It's possible they've realized things aren't going to end well for Russia, so they're trying to have it both ways until the war ends.

Well, if the war lasts until 2025, then maybe they could execute some people. Or maybe they'll delay once again. Hopefully.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Probably keeping them around as hostage diplomacy much like with Brittney Griner though that seemed more overt.

I think with her case, the fact that she's a black lesbian might have also played a role. Putin is anti-LGBTQ+ and he's not exactly welcoming towards people of color. His country doesn't have a lot of non-white immigrants, after all. Granted, she was a tourist, but the same logic still applies here.
 

Tiamat

I've seen the future...
I think with her case, the fact that she's a black lesbian might have also played a role. Putin is anti-LGBTQ+ and he's not exactly welcoming towards people of color. His country doesn't have a lot of non-white immigrants, after all. Granted, she was a tourist, but the same logic still applies here.


I think Putin can honestly care less about US domestic politics, something that not everyone realizes, he sees US domestic politics as more useful as a tool to divide Americans. By that he is less worried about Griner being a black lesbian (assuming she really is, and not claiming it just to look "cool") and is more focused on her being a minor American celebrity, thus a possible useful bargaining chip. Not like the Russians haven't done this before.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
I think Putin can honestly care less about US domestic politics, something that not everyone realizes, he sees US domestic politics as more useful as a tool to divide Americans. By that he is less worried about Griner being a black lesbian (assuming she really is, and not claiming it just to look "cool") and is more focused on her being a minor American celebrity, thus a possible useful bargaining chip. Not like the Russians haven't done this before.

I guess that this is why people such as Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard are so useful for Vladimir Putin. They help argue his cause to Western audiences, after all.
 

History Learner

Well-known member
By strict , literal definition and common sense, "Ukrainian" means total military and civilian deaths of Ukrainians. There is no way you can wiggle your way out of that.

Which is why, as usual, you need to actually learn to read before posting. I've told you many times and it continues to be obvious it's intentional on your end:

No, what eliminates the "context" of the 100k figure is that nowhere in it does it say civilian, it uses the word Ukrainian; you took that, because of your nature, as meaning what you wanted it too. The only part that does talk about civilian casualties is the OHCHR and the fact they don't comment on that is because there is no evidence for the 100,000 number being mostly civilians. Hell, CNN even did an interview with the guy and asked him directly; he refused to elaborate how many of 100,000 figure were civilian. Tell me, why he would do that if the majority are civilian? The propaganda value of that is obvious.

Does the word Ukrainians indicate a cumulative total? Sure, but nowhere in there does it lead to the exact opposite, which you have taken, as it meaning all are civilians. As I said before, the second paragraph explicitly states the opposite of what you're projecting. Furthermore, we have plenty of additional evidence to show large numbers of military casualties to buttress this position.

a) Because all other sources that aren't crazy propagandists put Ukrainian military losses in 10-30k territory.

What an odd thing to say, given the Ukrainian official position on June 10th was 10,000 KIA and 30,000 WIA so can safely conclude another area of you having no idea what you're talking about:



A a few days later David Arakhamia said the number was now 200 to 500 killed on average and many more wounded. Either way you stack it, your claim here is absolutely bunk.

b) Because even a worst singular city battle contributes estimated 10-20k of dead civilians alone, up to 1/5 of that figure.

A noticeably evidence free claim which, given your above lack of knowledge of casualties, suggests it should be taken with a grain of salt.

c) The very loose estimate of "tens of thousands, hope it's not over 100k" was referring to the absolute total, which includes areas held currently by Russia, which Ukraine cannot get any proper data from, while intel of more Bucha style behavior is probably arriving. Bucha alone contributed 1k dead, and that's a town that had a population of 36k before the war.

Why are you twisting yourself into a pretzel to try make the Russian military look good?

You literally just said Ukraine cannot get any proper data from Russian controlled areas....and then just cited a Ukrainian official making claims about casualties in a Russian controlled area. Really might need to exercise some self awareness about who is twisting themselves into a pretzel here, because it's not I.
 

History Learner

Well-known member
I truly don't get the point of your bullshit. Like, you're obviously not unintelligent. (Even if you act pretty damn dumb!) I can't believe you'd look at the overall strategic picture, of forced Russian withdrawal and protracted gruelling fighting, and honestly believe that the reality is 100,000 Ukrainian military losses for only 4,000 Russian KIA.

Well you kinda hit the nail on the head immediately, by citing Russian withdrawal from areas as to why the 100,000 figure is mostly military; how exactly can the Russians be killing Ukrainian civilians in large numbers if they're not occupying Ukrainian civilians in large numbers in the first place? Further, I'm glad Marduk brought up Bucha; if the Russians are actually out here mass executing Ukrainian civilians by the tens of thousands, where is the supporting evidence? The U.S. produced satellite imagery for Bucha, where are the killing fields that would contain bodies equal to Babi Yar? Maybe your take then is Russian airpower and missiles are just that horrific, but I thought the party line was the Russians were running out of them and they were very badly inaccurate?

Seriously, it's called critical thinking and far too many of you aren't using it in the least in this conflict. The narratives you have all bought into are directly contradictory and require you to get into so many logical contradictions it's not funny. This is a pretty good example of that, in that the article in question doesn't make the claim Marduk is claiming it does nor even, ironically, does the official in question; he conspicuously refused to elaborate. Given the obvious propaganda value, why?

Maybe because the truth is far closer to what I'm saying:

The battalion commander shrugged helplessly when we advised him that five days was a completely inadequate amount of time in which to train his soldiers. “This is all we have—they are needed on the front,” he replied with grim finality. A few days later, on a separate course that we were running for his medics, half of our class disappeared on the second day. “We have had casualties,” was the only explanation we received. Even in units that fall within the Ukrainian special operations command, most soldiers are sent to the front line with very little training. In one such unit, we estimated that just 20 percent had even fired a weapon before heading to combat.​

Or the fact they're now conscripting women, despite the AFU supposedly having 700,000 men in the ranks already as a result of the most recent mobilizations? You can't square all of these circles, my dude. If you want an updated take on Russian casualty figures, I'll be glad to do that; you have an extremely bad tendency to cite older posts while failing to take into context this war is still unfolding.

But, what's the point of loophole debating? It's not some vs debate, where you get pointless internet points for "winning" by pointing to some in universe quote about lasers being useless against shields. You're not convincing anyone here, you're not making yourself look good. It's far more likely that in the future you'll be held up for ridicule like in the last post by @Husky_Khan than it is you'll be hailed as the one true and prescient prophet... But, even if you did convince of the BS,so what? No one here is having any impact on the real world situation. Twisting interpretation of reality to fit what you want it to be won't actually twist reality itself. When it's all said and done, you're eventually going to have to admit your absurdly exaggerated stances were clearly wrong.

The amount of projection in this post is honestly hilarious. If it's no use in loophole debating, then why make this paragraph? Or, even better, this post given you were not the subject of the conversation to begin with? For someone who sees no "impact on the real world situation" or that I'm not "convincing anyone here", it's odd you've never stopped to consider that's exactly what you're achieving here with me? As I said, it's all projection, but since you brought up the subject of prophets:

Swift? Uh, mate, it's already past the point where that would be accurate. As for demanding payment in Rubles, how's that working so far and what makes you think it won't just lead to even less trade for the genocidal kleptocracy?

Truly, we live in an age of prophets with people like you around, Russia’s Oil Revenue Soars Despite Sanctions, Study Finds:

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine triggered global condemnation and tough sanctions aimed at denting Moscow’s war chest. Yet Russia’s revenues from fossil fuels, by far its biggest export, soared to records in the first 100 days of its war on Ukraine, driven by a windfall from oil sales amid surging prices, a new analysis shows.​
Russia earned what is very likely a record 93 billion euros in revenue from exports of oil, gas and coal in the first 100 days of the country’s invasion of Ukraine, according to data analyzed by the Center for Research on Energy and Clean Air, a research organization based in Helsinki, Finland. About two-thirds of those earnings, the equivalent of about $97 billion, came from oil, and most of the remainder from natural gas.​
“The current rate of revenue is unprecedented, because prices are unprecedented, and export volumes are close to their highest levels on record,” said Lauri Myllyvirta, an analyst who led the center’s research.​

I can only imagine you're so narrow minded and your world view is so filtered by your beliefs, that like a flat earther you'll bend over backwards to twist the evidence and logic to support those beliefs. That you can't even rationally examine any evidence that doesn't line up with what you've chosen to believe. If so, that's very, very sad. I'd pity you, if you hadn't chosen such a stupid stance to stand and fight for.

I mostly just find you a joke to be honest, especially with this fake sympathy here. You've spent this entire thread and every interaction with me in particular doing nothing but personal attacks because that's all you can do. You've never been able to bring any citation with me, and in our last tangle you promptly fucked off when I was able to cite seven different sources to prove my case. You're not fooling anybody with these fake crocodile tears, because I realize exactly what you are.
 

History Learner

Well-known member
His behavior patterns suggest a compulsive aversion to admitting error, and I do mean compulsive. I'm not 100% sure it's that, it may instead be something subtly different, such as a compulsion to always assert he's correct, or to always see himself as the smarter/more well-informed person in a given interaction.

Whatever it is though, the pathological need for it has gotten to the point where he's crippled his own ability to see when his behavior is embarrassing, and instead projects his own emotional state onto others.

Weird, given our last conversation I was able to cite multiple sources and to which you never replied. I don't have to pretend when I'm exactly right, do I? How about instead of launching personal attacks, you actually @ me next time because I'd love to show which of us is actually up to snuff.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top