I didn't watch the video, I was just able to post a screenshot of it with my magical powers, clearly. C'mon tough guy, you can do a better fake bluster than that.
Leaving aside the interesting claim that Javelins and Stingers are "old Soviet era stockpiles" which should make everyone question your credentials to comment on these things, the bit about getting modern replacements is what is center to the claim of whether NATO is running out....and which he directly admits they are, as I literally cited him saying with the screenshot. For someone who claims to have watched the video, it's quite funny you seem to have skipped the only relevant part, which says NATO can't replace the Stingers or Javelins, at least for the next several years.
Doesn't matter how good your doctrine is, which is a dubious claim in of itself as demonstrated from the lack of any recent NATO success in military affairs, if you don't have the tools of the trade. Care to explain how a piece of paper is going to stop T-90s rolling into Poland if you don't have ATGMs? Same goes for NATO's air and naval forces, unless you have suddenly discovered a means of destroyers to fight on land lol.
Since you don't know what combined armed assets NATO has.....
List of active United States Air Force aircraft - Wikipedia
List of United States naval aircraft - Wikipedia
French Air and Space Force - Wikipedia
List of active United Kingdom military aircraft - Wikipedia
List of currently active German military aircraft | Military Wiki | Fandom
List of current ships of the United States Navy - Wikipedia
List of active Royal Navy ships - Wikipedia
List of active French Navy ships - Wikipedia
And this is not even all of the assets of the other NATO members. Do you really think the stingers and javelins were the main anti air and anti ground weapons NATO has. They are a small suppliment not the main fist of NATO.