Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

Pulls out my Bullhorn.........

kuzze_in_smoke.jpeg


This ain't normal for any ship.

Hey Russia your Navy is a fucking Joke!!!!

Go home and let real Navies travel the ocean.
 
China is looking at all of this and going............ We aren't gonna have any backup if we try to attack Taiwan are we???
 
My favorite always was the systematic, fleet-wide and very deliberate disregard of cordite handling procedures that led to a substantial portion of their dreadnought fleet getting sunk in WWI.
And the man with most responsibility for the loss of those battlecruisers was so well connected that ... he got promoted.
 


Also, some in Russia are already calling this a causus belli and if there really were nukes aboard...things get very interesting when it comes to salvage rights vs intel collection/who can get to it first, and where precisely it settle's on the seabed.


Casus Belli? Over an accidental munitions explosion and a heavy sea state?

Who are they going to declare war on? Ukraine? Ukraine is where the shipyard where they are built is located! Declaring War on Ukraine is the absolute dumbest thing to do if you want them to build a replacement to the Moskva that was lost in a tragic munitions accident and storm. That's not Ukraine's fault. That's Neptunes fault.

Anyways it's not a big deal. As we've already learned in this thread, the Russians are replacing the Moskva, a guided missile cruiser, with a brand new amphibious helicopter assault ship, the Mitrofan Moskalenko that has FOUR TIMES THE TONNAGE and ONE FORTIETH THE AIR DEFENSE AND SURFACE POWER of the Moskva it's apparently replacing.



And as I learned from this handy video... the Moskva was supposed to be replaced around... 2040 which... judging by the delays in the Kuznetsov refit and the Lider-class Destroyer.... 2040 seems like a reasonable time frame for the launch of the replacement Mitrofan Moskalenko.
 
So many memes popping up as a result of this munitions explosion.











Oh wait... that last guy isn't a memer, that's apparently an actual serious pro-Russian account.

Someone apperently that is proving Oryx wrong...
 
Agent23 Russia is down one ship. The Pentagon does not have to gloat. The fact that the Russian Navy's Shipboard at sea in a combat area damage control team are a laughing joke is pretty damning in an of itself. Are you gonna shill for the Russian Navy or do I have to crack my knuckles and bombard you with all of the current Russian Naval Fuckups. Take the L and head back to shore Landlubber.

Remind me, who lost a much newer ship recently?

Anyway, here is ArmchairWarlord's take on the whole situation, and I generally see it as superior to all the chicknehawk quacking going on here:
 
Remind me, who lost a much newer ship recently?

Anyway, here is ArmchairWarlord's take on the whole situation, and I generally see it as superior to all the chicknehawk quacking going on here:

So you want to play the lost game Okie Dokie............


You don't want to go tip for tap on who has had the worst Naval Disasters. You will lose.
 
So you want to play the lost game Okie Dokie............


You don't want to go tip for tap on who has had the worst Naval Disasters. You will lose.
The USA did not lose a large portion of its shipbuilding industries and did not get hit with massive economic and social damage followed by a lost decade in the 1990s.
And besides, as I argued back on SB years ago, they have always been a primarily land power that traditionally under-invests in their navy, with the primary focus usually being SSBNs.

So, yeah, I think they are doing OK given the circumstances, with a program to modernize underway.
It is sad the ship bought it, but it is not the unmitigated disaster proving across the board Russian incompetence chickenhawks on here try to make it out to be.
 
The USA did not lose a large portion of its shipbuilding industries and did not get hit with massive economic and social damage followed by a lost decade in the 1990s.
And besides, as I argued back on SB years ago, they have always been a primarily land power that traditionally under-invests in their navy, with the primary focus usually being SSBNs.

So, yeah, I think they are doing OK given the circumstances, with a program to modernize underway.
It is sad the ship bought it, but it is not the unmitigated disaster proving across the board Russian incompetence chickenhawks on here try to make it out to be.
Ah huh yeah I see........... Cope.
 
@Agent23 if you have time to watch The Princess Bride perhaps you also found the time to watch that video of Russians gunning down civilians in Bucha?
Sorry, I don't watch Elenski's crappy cinema, I could barely stomach ten minutes of Rzhevsky Versus Napoleon and the guy's small dick overcompensation is eyeroll-inducing, even when they try to play it as tongue in cheek comedy.
 
Last edited:
@Agent23 if you have time to watch The Princess Bride perhaps you also found the time to watch that video of Russians gunning down civilians in Bucha?
Of course he hasn't. I've never seen anyone who so blatantly ignores anything and everything that doesn't fit their preconceived notions. He tries to justify things that don't fit, but if he can't do that he'll literally just put his fingers in his ears and go "LA LA LA" like a toddler hoping to get out of bedtime.
 
The ship was nearly lost with all hands? How the hell did that happen? Modern warships are designed not to sink too quickly and she must have had support vessels nearby.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top