You think this is
new? We had left-wing terrorist groups running
terror bombing campaigns on US soil at the peak of the Cold War, while the entire Democratic Party and major cultural institutions like Hollywood simped for the fucking Soviets.
And they
still lost. You do the math.
This. 95% of the stupidity seems to stem from "well, this side bad, so other side good, right?" No. No, not one fucking bit.
Hey
@Chiron I'd like an answer to this too.
Ah yes, we blew up a wedding once upon a time so that's totally the same as systematically targeting hospitals, laying waste to entire suburban neighborhoods with sustained area bombardment with MLRS and using incendiary weapons - not white phosphorus, but outright thermite incendiaries, on suburbs.
Hey check this shit out. It's called
a DIME bomb; Dense Inert Metal Explosive. Basically it's a bomb that uses tungsten dust as its shrapnel - it vaporizes anything within 15 feet or so, but as the air resistance slows down the tiny tungsten particles very fast, anything 17 feet away survives unscathed. Or how about that
fabled Hellfire missile with pop-out sword blades? Specifically so you can take out some bastard in the left-hand seat without hurting the guy on the right. But yeah, go on and tell me about how America makes mass-murder of civilians a fucking
doctrinal norm.
Which is a dogshit plan given that you need manpower to take cities, even with all the technology in the world on your side, and since Russian logistics are rail dependent they
have to take cities since they control crucial rail yard junctions. Chernihiv and Konotop being two key ones they never took, which effectively cost them the battle of Kyiv. And if they want to work
around the problem that means running supply convoys around the major road junctions in those cities on shitty, narrow surface roads that provide great cover for ambushes. And the fact that Ukraine was going to use such strategies isn't a shock, the US has been
openly training the Baltic states to use unconventional/asymmetric warfare strategies against a potential Russian invasion for years now. So their inability to even provide a single IFV's worth of convoy escort at the beginning speaks to fucking
stupidity. And even after they wised up, you know what you simply cannot do without when it comes to securing long supply routes? Local control and
local patrols. And that equals
manpower.
What the fuck are you babbling about? Of
course they would. Ukraine started this war with less of every kind of equipment than Russia did, so even if they had not lost a single tank NATO would still want to get them as many weapons as possible. Even if they started with
more, NATO would still want to do that because the sooner the war ends and the more damage inflicted on the Russian army the better it is for NATO. This is a
full scale war, you fucking numpty. You don't take half-measures, you don't fuck around, you go all in, balls deep.
Capiche?
"MUH AFGHANISTAN!" cries the vatnik as he wishes away eleven carrier battle groups and the most powerful airforce on the planet. "MUUUH AFGHANISTAAAAAAAAAAAAN!"
Coming from someone licking Putin's taint that's not very convincing.
lmao
this
It's called being able to read a fucking book, zoomer. I know something of computer networking, oil extraction, military matters, political science and economics myself. I even know something about nutrition and diet because I lift. You don't have to be a fucking expert to call out clowns making shit up as they go along.
In term of priority ranking, "resisting the pedo globalists" is less pressing than "survive and defeat the nation literally invading your sovereign soil in order to systematically destroy your state and genocide your people." Best part is, nation that has done the latter will have a much stronger sense of identity and thus ability to resist the former.
