2nd Civil War Theorycrafting Thread, Peaches Free

  • Thread starter Deleted member 88
  • Start date
Oh I wasn't saying it was a good thing, only that it's incredibly naive to assume the US couldn't go through a second ACW.

America only having one is actually a rarity as far as hyperpowers go. Was more my point. So Zach thinking it ain't happening because the collateral damage would make it unthinkable is perhaps a tad naive?

That was where I was going.

Exactly.WW1 happened,when all sides have good economical reasons to keep peace.But generals on both sides belived in "short,victorious war".
Normal american do not belive that,but Kamala? she probably belive that her pederast and black legions quickly destroy all bad whites.
 
Local criminals? Not just them man!

You'd have rural and suburban areas where the community leaders and wealthiest small to low large business owners come together, form their own private armies and then go apeshit on big agro..raping, pillaging and looting. Caudillos were a thing for a reason after all.

A favorite pass time of Dominicans during their domestic shitstorms was blowing up the corporate HQ's of big banks..Why? Because it was fun watching the Stock market panic with no one really knowing why because wanton destruction for the lulz is an important way to blow off stress during civil strife View attachment 805
All you had to do was follow the damn train CJ!

Now we're in a damn civil war because of that busta!

What's a big agro?
 
One does have to remember. Both sides would be effected by the insurrection act
 
I found one of the perfect Federal Loyalist soldiers



If a 2ACW comes to pass, it's these types of people who will be given frontline duty fighting other americans. Keep that in mind.


This fat, out of shape, oath breaking carpet muncher thinks she is gonna fight a bunch of Appies and good ol boys and swamp runners and win? :ROFLMAO:

Jesus Christ its retards like this on both sides of this issue that are going to pull us towards a conflagration at this rate.
 
This fat, out of shape, oath breaking carpet muncher thinks she is gonna fight a bunch of Appies and good ol boys and swamp runners and win? :ROFLMAO:

Jesus Christ its retards like this on both sides of this issue that are going to pull us towards a conflagration at this rate.
I mean. She doesn't seem out of shape or fat.
Don't think that way cause of the uniform. They make everyone look bigger then they are
 
And let's be honest: If a bunch of 9th century tribesmen can outlast the clowns running the US military, we can do the same.
There is a big difference between fighting the US government in Afghanistan and fighting the US government in the US.
The war in afghanistan was fought to make money for military-industry complex megacorps and justify stealing more civil rights in the name of security, not to be won. The taliban never posed an actual threat to the american leadership and the only lives those leaders care about are their own. Compare the cold war, when the soviets openly wanted to kill all the american leaders and had weapons capable of carrying out said threat, meaning the leaders faced an actual threat to themselves, not merely the lives of their pawns and their rules of engagement they okayed then, specifically, 'we are only being prevented from outright genociding you with nuclear weapons because you also have nuclear weapons so if we tried it, we'd both die.'
 
I think perceived legitimacy, or a lack thereof, will outweigh the hatred the American managerial elite has for its citizens and its self-preservation instincts & plans if affairs degenerate to a shooting war. I don't doubt they would quite like to remain on top, and to go to any length to maintain their control, but unless they happen to have developed a robot army in complete secrecy under Cheyenne Mountain or something, it's not going to matter if they can't motivate the vast majority of the armed forces & police to continue doing their bidding and really start laying into the American people. Worst they can do is draw their own deaths out some more and take more people down with them while they're at it.

If brute force and a murderous contempt for your own citizens was all it took to maintain absolute control, the August Coup - spearheaded by agencies, generals and apparatchiks with open totalitarian control over the lives of their subjects, and whose disregard for human life must have at least matched (and more probably exceeded) that of the worst 3-letter agencies - should've preserved the Soviet Union, not killed it. There will always be bullies in uniform like that SJW Bronson whose video was posted up on this very page, as there were Soviet troops who were still willing to open fire on the enemies of the regime in the very last days of that regime.

But once the rubber hits the road, how many US soldiers will be able and willing to gun down crowds and/or militias - or even their own fellow soldiers and National Guardsmen who've defected to the opposition - in service to the government that just rendered 20 years of their blood, sweat and tears not only pointless, but turned it into an absolutely spectacular international embarrassment which will potentially dwarf even the Carter years, weeks before they are reminded of all of what it was supposed to be for in the first place? Will cops still bother to do as their chiefs and DAs and mayors say, and save Antifa from the consequences of their actions when it's not probably-glowie Proud Boys with non-lethal weapons beating them in a street skirmish but rather a mob of uncontrolled and armed vigilantes which are openly out for their blood?

And if they still are willing to do the establishment's dirty work, how many times can they be expected to do it until they get tired enough of serving a regime that increasingly blatantly doesn't care about them; doesn't know or care what it's doing past making the deplorables hurt; and has no goals beyond self-perpetuation and spiting the groups it despises (including the armed & police services themselves) that they stand down, desert or defect? At least when PLA tankers were running people over at Tiananmen in service to Deng Xiaoping, they could claim 'hey, at least that guy made life better for us' and it would be true compared to the horrors of the Mao years - what can America's managerial technocratic class say they've done for the thin green & blue lines recently? I think the answers to these questions is what will ultimately determine the longevity of the establishment in a hot civil war.

(Nukes, I think, we can safely take off the table - if anything using one on your own home soil, besides destroying the country you're trying to keep ruling, would kill your legitimacy and deprive you of your remaining supporters quicker than any August Coup lookalike would; not for nothing did the Soviets refuse to use theirs to preserve control of either the Warsaw Pact or their own Union)
 
So Huffpost came out with this article
Man, they really are trying to hype up Jan 6th as much as possible to justify themselves, aren't they?

Though I guess they aren't wrong to be worried, because the powers in DC (including the Pentagon) are increasingly at odds with how the rest of America functions and lives, and are trying to render the Constituion null and void in every way they can.

Of course there won't be a civil war among the 'properly loyal' troops that report to DC directly, who will have already been purged of free thinkers and anyone who dares to question the 2020 election or the Wu Flu bullshit, and any real fighting is likely to be state level troops resisting DC troops following unConstitutional orders.

Though I think if Texas wanted to, they could leave, and take a lot of the sane parts of the nation with them in trying to create an America 2.0, this time with without the corruption of centralized power in DC or the insanity going on around the Wu Flu.
 
Knowing the other side is s good idea. Gotta run intel.

If they are already running this sort of propaganda it is very worrying. Shows they either think it can happen or they think they need the ilusion it can happen to keep control. I suspect next year will see a lot more panic as local elections, much harder to fix with a few well placed deep blue cities, show a red wave.
 
So Huffpost came out with this article

Remember,that he is commie.

When commie say that somebody would attack him,it mean,that commie is planning attack.
Leftist arleady decided to start cyvil war,what they are doing is making sure that they could shout,after sending you to gulag,that you are evil conspirator.
Only question is - would you let them send you and other normal american to gulag and do nothing,or would you fight?
Becouse war is sure now,and leftist would start it.What members of military,like you,would do then?

P.S for those who do not lived in commie country - commies always accuse others of what they are planning to do.Consider this,when you read what they say.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top