Yeah, I heard that too. I think it was on the Podcast of the Lotus Eaters. Apparently it's been very consistent throughout history that 5% of women lack the desire to have children... Which of course means that most of the current crop of childless women have been effectively forced/tricked into it by feminism. And those same women, on some level realizing they've been duped, are now reeing in a mixture of jealousy and misplaced anger whenever they come across women who didn't get duped (e.g. tradwives).
The rampant "Your life is not complete without the latest new Shiny Thing (TM)" keep up with the Jonses consumerism isn't helping.
To be fair if laws were made restricting women’s access to work like the past then the economy would change. Wages would go up and single breadwinners households could be possible again.
There are a lot of soc-med videos and posts from older feminists now saying either "where have all the good men gone?" (they haven't learned their lesson and are looking for a sucker to settle down with now that their "fun years" are over with) or "don't be duped by feminism" (they learned their lesson and are trying to warn the younger women not to do what they did).
When they're not looking to get their backs blown out by Chads and Tyrones, women (even women who are, frankly, a 3 on a scale of 10) have said they'll only go for the top 5% of men (six figure income, six pack, over six foot, et cetera). That top 5% have, well, options, and they're not going to date or marry Jabba the Hutt's sister, nor would they likely just settle for one woman (because, again, options and women are fucking desperate, despite knowing they're being played).
That’s exactly why I said what I said earlier the extra P.A. our devalued waves the only way to raise them is either communism by ordering private businesses to give raises, OR we go back to traditional society where half the population are home makers.
