"TradWives" Triggering Unhappy Feminists

To be fair if laws were made restricting women’s access to work like the past then the economy would change. Wages would go up and single breadwinners households could be possible again.
Everyone's labor was happily devalued by the employers who welcomed all the female workers into the workforce not by paying what had been a wage to support a man, wife and kids but instead expecting dual income and no longer needing to pay a wage that supports a family. I'm all for women working, but they devalued the wage expectation and so now the lower classes can't support a home on one income and need to get a benefit or both parents need to work. This has caused a huge disruption in how kids are raised and the ability of working class families to rise through home ownership and savings.
Historically, women in the working class did what now would be considered part time jobs, very often working from home in the cottage industry. Alternatively they join their husband in his profession.
 
Hook up culture and its consequences have been a disaster for the Human race.
There have been so many advice requested topics (especially on that feminist/simp shit-hole Reddit) where a husband, fiance, or boyfriend discovers that not only did their girl lie about how many dicks she'd taken in the past, but also that the "vanilla" stuff they do is a far cry from her being used as a cum dumpster by Chads and Tyrones ("Hershey Highway", oral, et cetera) in said hidden past.

99% of the time these threads result in a dumping or a divorce, and the women still stick to their guns saying, "but I don't do those things with you because I love you/value our relationship!".

Here's a conundrum for feminists and 304's: if body-count doesn't matter and women shouldn't be shamed for "exploring themselves"/being a cum dumpster, then why do they hide it from the guys they want an actual relationship with?

I think the answer is obvious.
 
Guys can accept the high bodycount, leaving aside the whole issue of pair bonding for the sake of the argument. What they can't accept is being the emasculated safe guy. Honestly, Reddit is a bit like the Jerry Springer show in that regard, but the sheer number of cases that you can read about where a guy finds out about the wild days/years of his fiancée/wife and eventually break up with her not because of her number, but because of what she doesn't do with him -- the man she supposedly chose for life -- but enthusiastically did with random Chads -- is quite telling.
 
Last edited:
Guys can accept the high bodycount, leaving aside the whole issue of pair bonding for the sake of the argument. What they can't accept is being the emasculated safe guy. Honestly, Reddit is a bit like Jerry Springer show in that regard, but the sheer number of cases that you can read about where a guy finds out about the wild days/years of his fiancée/wife and eventually break up with her not because of her number, but because of what she doesn't do with him -- the man she supposedly chose for life -- but enthusiastically did with random Chads -- is quite telling.
Man I can get that. As someone who genuinely doesn't care about high body counts, if I find out she was a freak with other dudes, but doesn't wanna do that with me, I would be pissed.

Fine. Have a high body count. I do too. We better be getting freaky in bed, though.

I am also not interested in taking care of one of those past guy's kids.
 
My issue with the high body count is that it tends to show that they’re unreliable where relationships and exclusivity are concerned. So there’s a much greater risk of said women backstabbing you by either cheating, divorcing you once they think they’ve snagged ‘someone better’ Or both.
 
My issue with the high body count is that it tends to show that they’re unreliable where relationships and exclusivity are concerned. So there’s a much greater risk of said women backstabbing you by either cheating, divorcing you once they think they’ve snagged ‘someone better’ Or both.
That's because scientifically they are less loyal the more partners they have, i don't have my debate folder so i can't source it but from what i remember after the first partner they are something insane like 50% more likely to cheat🤡
 
Guys can accept the high bodycount, leaving aside the whole issue of pair bonding for the sake of the argument. What they can't accept is being the emasculated safe guy. Honestly, Reddit is a bit like Jerry Springer show in that regard, but the sheer number of cases that you can read about where a guy finds out about the wild days/years of his fiancée/wife and eventually break up with her not because of her number, but because of what she doesn't do with him -- the man she supposedly chose for life -- but enthusiastically did with random Chads -- is quite telling.

ah the "fall back boyfriend". the guy that girls date just to have a boyfriend/private uber driver that they can openly try to cuck in public with more desirable men. and more often than not the "boyfriend" being publicly humiliated and emasculated is, at least lowkey aware it is going on, but doesn't do anything about it - either because he thinks the girl is ultimately going to "go home with him", or because the men the girl is flirting with publicly are much more physically impressive and intimidating.

Always brutal when I notice that happening. It's happened to me so many times - although i've always been on the side being flirted with. The look in the boyfriends eyes always gets me. In some cases these were people I knew in an extended social circle; I knew these guys, they were good guys.

It's led me to believe that girls actually enjoy cucking their "boyfriends" with more desirable, more dominant men. Like, sexually enjoy it, it turns them on. Which goes in line with their ancient biology of course. Women are never "yours"; they only belong to the most dominant men in any given setting.
 
ah the "fall back boyfriend". the guy that girls date just to have a boyfriend/private uber driver that they can openly try to cuck in public with more desirable men. and more often than not the "boyfriend" being publicly humiliated and emasculated is, at least lowkey aware it is going on, but doesn't do anything about it - either because he thinks the girl is ultimately going to "go home with him", or because the men the girl is flirting with publicly are much more physically impressive and intimidating.

Always brutal when I notice that happening. It's happened to me so many times - although i've always been on the side being flirted with. The look in the boyfriends eyes always gets me. In some cases these were people I knew in an extended social circle; I knew these guys, they were good guys.

It's led me to believe that girls actually enjoy cucking their "boyfriends" with more desirable, more dominant men. Like, sexually enjoy it, it turns them on. Which goes in line with their ancient biology of course. Women are never "yours"; they only belong to the most dominant men in any given setting.

"God Created Men and Sam Colt Made Them Equal!"

Just sayin, muscles and size aren't much of an advantage if you don't fight fair. And if you are fighting fair, you aren't fighting right.
 
It's led me to believe that girls actually enjoy cucking their "boyfriends" with more desirable, more dominant men. Like, sexually enjoy it, it turns them on. Which goes in line with their ancient biology of course. Women are never "yours"; they only belong to the most dominant men in any given setting.
Not all of them. I know a few who outright never engaged in hook up culture in the first place, or just dipped their toe in, hated, and happily stuck with one partner. Oddly enough, they are very happy with their lives.

Woman like strength in their partner (although, strength can come in different ways. Strength of character can be more attractive than physique, for example), likely stemming from a primal desire for protection. This natural instinct has been completely corrupted by a hyper materialistic, hedonistic, "anything goes" society.
 
Not all of them. I know a few who outright never engaged in hook up culture in the first place, or just dipped their toe in, hated, and happily stuck with one partner. Oddly enough, they are very happy with their lives.

Woman like strength in their partner (although, strength can come in different ways. Strength of character can be more attractive than physique, for example), likely stemming from a primal desire for protection. This natural instinct has been completely corrupted by a hyper materialistic, hedonistic, "anything goes" society.
It's always been a stereotype for a reason that blokes who don't pay attention to a girl when others do pretty much catches their attention. Women don't like simps and "Nice Guys" until they want to "settle down"/a provider.
 
...
It's always been a stereotype for a reason that blokes who don't pay attention to a girl when others do pretty much catches their attention. Women don't like simps and "Nice Guys" until they want to "settle down"/a provider.

The video is blocked in the US.
 
That one is too. A summary, if you please?
Trixie from Fairly Odd Grandparents being pissed that the main character is "ignoring her ignoring him" on the bus, to the point of her physically shaking him, while another kid from behind simps for her saying "you can ignore me" and she stares at him with blank disinterest.
 
It's always been a stereotype for a reason that blokes who don't pay attention to a girl when others do pretty much catches their attention. Women don't like simps and "Nice Guys" until they want to "settle down"/a provider.

I don't even think they like simps and Nice Guys when they want to settle down. They want the man who is in control of himself and thinks about more than the sex.
 
"God Created Men and Sam Colt Made Them Equal!"

Just sayin, muscles and size aren't much of an advantage if you don't fight fair. And if you are fighting fair, you aren't fighting right.
Not all of them. I know a few who outright never engaged in hook up culture in the first place, or just dipped their toe in, hated, and happily stuck with one partner. Oddly enough, they are very happy with their lives.

Woman like strength in their partner (although, strength can come in different ways. Strength of character can be more attractive than physique, for example), likely stemming from a primal desire for protection. This natural instinct has been completely corrupted by a hyper materialistic, hedonistic, "anything goes" society.
Trixie from Fairly Odd Grandparents being pissed that the main character is "ignoring her ignoring him" on the bus, to the point of her physically shaking him, while another kid from behind simps for her saying "you can ignore me" and she stares at him with blank disinterest.
I don't even think they like simps and Nice Guys when they want to settle down. They want the man who is in control of himself and thinks about more than the sex.

@DarthOne: In the real world, you would be correct. In the domesticated social day to day life that is the western world, it certainly does matter. You would be amazed the things girls look over and rate men for. They are absurdly visual in that regard.

@Lord Sovereign: Good point.

@Jormungandr and Lord Sovereign (again): Girls - particularly very attractive girls - are not used to being ignored. When a man they and all of their friends are attracted to ignores them and treats them like everybody else - with cordial disinterest-, it only makes them more interested in you. To the point they may get a bit creepy. They also tend to start acting more and more like little girls around you who will get excited at you just giving them any attention, like their daddy.

You want to be an enigmatic source of authority, safety, and energy for any girls you chose to be around. It keeps them in line and keeps things going smoothly. Break that arrangement, and things start to go haywire very quickly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top