Lord Sovereign
The resident Britbong
Hook up culture and its consequences have been a disaster for the Human race."... and my higher double digit bodycount, where I did all the naughty stuff I naturally won't do with you."
Hook up culture and its consequences have been a disaster for the Human race."... and my higher double digit bodycount, where I did all the naughty stuff I naturally won't do with you."
To be fair if laws were made restricting women’s access to work like the past then the economy would change. Wages would go up and single breadwinners households could be possible again.
Historically, women in the working class did what now would be considered part time jobs, very often working from home in the cottage industry. Alternatively they join their husband in his profession.Everyone's labor was happily devalued by the employers who welcomed all the female workers into the workforce not by paying what had been a wage to support a man, wife and kids but instead expecting dual income and no longer needing to pay a wage that supports a family. I'm all for women working, but they devalued the wage expectation and so now the lower classes can't support a home on one income and need to get a benefit or both parents need to work. This has caused a huge disruption in how kids are raised and the ability of working class families to rise through home ownership and savings.
There have been so many advice requested topics (especially on that feminist/simp shit-hole Reddit) where a husband, fiance, or boyfriend discovers that not only did their girl lie about how many dicks she'd taken in the past, but also that the "vanilla" stuff they do is a far cry from her being used as a cum dumpster by Chads and Tyrones ("Hershey Highway", oral, et cetera) in said hidden past.Hook up culture and its consequences have been a disaster for the Human race.
Man I can get that. As someone who genuinely doesn't care about high body counts, if I find out she was a freak with other dudes, but doesn't wanna do that with me, I would be pissed.Guys can accept the high bodycount, leaving aside the whole issue of pair bonding for the sake of the argument. What they can't accept is being the emasculated safe guy. Honestly, Reddit is a bit like Jerry Springer show in that regard, but the sheer number of cases that you can read about where a guy finds out about the wild days/years of his fiancée/wife and eventually break up with her not because of her number, but because of what she doesn't do with him -- the man she supposedly chose for life -- but enthusiastically did with random Chads -- is quite telling.
That's because scientifically they are less loyal the more partners they have, i don't have my debate folder so i can't source it but from what i remember after the first partner they are something insane like 50% more likely to cheatMy issue with the high body count is that it tends to show that they’re unreliable where relationships and exclusivity are concerned. So there’s a much greater risk of said women backstabbing you by either cheating, divorcing you once they think they’ve snagged ‘someone better’ Or both.
Guys can accept the high bodycount, leaving aside the whole issue of pair bonding for the sake of the argument. What they can't accept is being the emasculated safe guy. Honestly, Reddit is a bit like Jerry Springer show in that regard, but the sheer number of cases that you can read about where a guy finds out about the wild days/years of his fiancée/wife and eventually break up with her not because of her number, but because of what she doesn't do with him -- the man she supposedly chose for life -- but enthusiastically did with random Chads -- is quite telling.
ah the "fall back boyfriend". the guy that girls date just to have a boyfriend/private uber driver that they can openly try to cuck in public with more desirable men. and more often than not the "boyfriend" being publicly humiliated and emasculated is, at least lowkey aware it is going on, but doesn't do anything about it - either because he thinks the girl is ultimately going to "go home with him", or because the men the girl is flirting with publicly are much more physically impressive and intimidating.
Always brutal when I notice that happening. It's happened to me so many times - although i've always been on the side being flirted with. The look in the boyfriends eyes always gets me. In some cases these were people I knew in an extended social circle; I knew these guys, they were good guys.
It's led me to believe that girls actually enjoy cucking their "boyfriends" with more desirable, more dominant men. Like, sexually enjoy it, it turns them on. Which goes in line with their ancient biology of course. Women are never "yours"; they only belong to the most dominant men in any given setting.
Not all of them. I know a few who outright never engaged in hook up culture in the first place, or just dipped their toe in, hated, and happily stuck with one partner. Oddly enough, they are very happy with their lives.It's led me to believe that girls actually enjoy cucking their "boyfriends" with more desirable, more dominant men. Like, sexually enjoy it, it turns them on. Which goes in line with their ancient biology of course. Women are never "yours"; they only belong to the most dominant men in any given setting.
It's always been a stereotype for a reason that blokes who don't pay attention to a girl when others do pretty much catches their attention. Women don't like simps and "Nice Guys" until they want to "settle down"/a provider.Not all of them. I know a few who outright never engaged in hook up culture in the first place, or just dipped their toe in, hated, and happily stuck with one partner. Oddly enough, they are very happy with their lives.
Woman like strength in their partner (although, strength can come in different ways. Strength of character can be more attractive than physique, for example), likely stemming from a primal desire for protection. This natural instinct has been completely corrupted by a hyper materialistic, hedonistic, "anything goes" society.
It's always been a stereotype for a reason that blokes who don't pay attention to a girl when others do pretty much catches their attention. Women don't like simps and "Nice Guys" until they want to "settle down"/a provider.
Seriously? Fucking YouTube.
Trixie from Fairly Odd Grandparents being pissed that the main character is "ignoring her ignoring him" on the bus, to the point of her physically shaking him, while another kid from behind simps for her saying "you can ignore me" and she stares at him with blank disinterest.That one is too. A summary, if you please?
It's always been a stereotype for a reason that blokes who don't pay attention to a girl when others do pretty much catches their attention. Women don't like simps and "Nice Guys" until they want to "settle down"/a provider.
Mind explaining?
"God Created Men and Sam Colt Made Them Equal!"
Just sayin, muscles and size aren't much of an advantage if you don't fight fair. And if you are fighting fair, you aren't fighting right.
Not all of them. I know a few who outright never engaged in hook up culture in the first place, or just dipped their toe in, hated, and happily stuck with one partner. Oddly enough, they are very happy with their lives.
Woman like strength in their partner (although, strength can come in different ways. Strength of character can be more attractive than physique, for example), likely stemming from a primal desire for protection. This natural instinct has been completely corrupted by a hyper materialistic, hedonistic, "anything goes" society.
Trixie from Fairly Odd Grandparents being pissed that the main character is "ignoring her ignoring him" on the bus, to the point of her physically shaking him, while another kid from behind simps for her saying "you can ignore me" and she stares at him with blank disinterest.
I don't even think they like simps and Nice Guys when they want to settle down. They want the man who is in control of himself and thinks about more than the sex.