Three spots for two Neptune Missiles? Then again the Moskva hasn't technically sunk.
I mean that would STILL be better then this.I was thinking more like redneck D-Day.
"OK, so we need to take these beaches, but we don't have any real landing craft, but we do have this guy's bass boat, and that's basically the same thing. Actually, it's better, because landing craft don't have a sound system. I hope you guys like AC/DC, because the owner says the CD is stuck in the tray and won't come out, so that's we're listening to."
https://news.yahoo.com/pentagon-confirms-explosion-aboard-russian-135835087.htmlLooking forward to the "no, we let the Ukrainians blow up our flagship on purpose, because in letting them destroy it we tricked them into expending all thier anti-ship missiles so now they can't sink these civilian fish boats we stole and spray painted a Z onto" narrative.
In an interview on CNN, Kirby said the explosion was “sizable enough” that U.S. officials “picked up indications that other naval vessels around her tried to come to her assistance.”
“Eventually, that wasn’t apparently needed, so she’s making her own way now across the Black Sea,” Kirby said, “and we’ll continue to try to monitor this as best we can.”
That doesn't stop them dick stroking whenever early, partial, unconfirmed news about something bad happening to the Russians arises, even if the news is pants on head retarded.Frankly, the only thing people on this thread know - with all our levels of clearance (LOL) - is that some kind of explosion happened on the ship.
Can be a hit, sabotage, or accident. All are known to happen during a conflict.
That doesn't stop them dick stroking whenever early, partial, unconfirmed news about something bad happening to the Russians arises.
Also:
So, yeah, posting this here again:
Telegram said:"We do assess that there was an explosion, at least one explosion on this cruiser. A fairly major one at that, that has caused extensive damage to the ship," Kirby said.
No explosion,
He literally says there was an explosion with major damage. Read your source?No explosion, ship still afloat, moving under own power.
You may now switch to actual porn to continue with the dick stroking.
Franky this might have been a sabotage attempt, since this ship has a crew of over 500, and since Ukraine and Russia were one country 30 years ago.
Or it is just an old ship(40+ years of service IIRC) in a fleet that is in a state of war, and mishaps happen.
Oof, now why did I misread 'an' as 'no'?He literally says there was an explosion with major damage. Read your source?
It is a very old ship, and one not completely refitted.You do realize that deflecting claims your warship was damaged by enemy action by instead saying that no, you blew it up yourself through your own incompetence in either operating the ship or vetting it's crew makes you look worse, not better, right?
So, yeah, posting this here again:
No explosion, ship still afloat, moving under own power.
You may now switch to actual porn to continue with the dick stroking.
It is a very old ship, and one not completely refitted.
And it did not blow up, it is still capable of movement, seaworthy, and iirc from another article its main armament wasn't damaged.
So, yeah, storm in a teacup, these things happen, like when that US troopship burned last year.
Tech sometimes fails, people sometime make mistakes.
Every Russia ship is old and outdated.
I'm not particularly interested in phrasing my statement to be accurate vs demeaning to Russia, "Russia says the Ukrainians have nothing on Russia when it come to blowing up Russian ships" is funnier than the entirely accurate version.
Also, these things don't "just happen" when you're talking about a ship that costs hundreds millions of rubles, or in US terms, several dozen dollars. When you invest that much money in something, having someone accidentally cripple it through thier own incompetence is inexcusable.
Munitions blew up inside of it, the ship itself did not blow up.
Read up on the Kuznetsov.Also, these things don't "just happen" when you're talking about a ship that costs hundreds millions of rubles, or in US terms, several dozen dollars. When you invest that much money in something, having someone accidentally cripple it through thier own incompetence is inexcusable.
Here's what we know: Moskva was damaged because something went BOOM!It's amazing how the rest of us are somehow able to operate with independent thought without kneejerk pro-Russian Propaganda hot takes, actually posting contrary narratives and the like when new information comes out. Shocking.
Frankly, the only thing people on this thread know - with all our levels of clearance (LOL) - is that some kind of explosion happened on the ship.
Can be a hit, sabotage, or accident. All are known to happen during a conflict.