I mean it sucks, but this is what all those smug gloats about the drive by molotov attacks and resistance to the last man lead to. Drive a vehicle towards a vehicle column? Get treated like a threat.I'm honestly surprised there wasn't more commentary on that old couple who got blown away by the Russians for no reason.
Most of not all top down AT weapons are Tandem.Do you even know how top attack missiles work? US tanks have Cage to protect against shitty forty year old RPGs, coming in from the sides and rear. That's not what the Ukrainians are shooting at Russian tanks. Top attack missiles either have a standard heat or tandem heat warhead that comes in on a big looping high angle arc to strike the top armor of the tank or overflys the tank to detonate the explosion downwards out the side of the missile into the top of the tank. You'll note that the Abrams has zero protection against either of these, just relying on its top armor protection.
In the case of both types of top attack missiles, spaced armor could plausibly help, though the calculations of strength of the plasma jet, vs armor, vs required standoff distance is totally unknown to me. It could be that the missile warhead is powerful enough that you would need meters of standoff to dissipate the metal jet sufficiently to prevent serious damage, but I doubt that as a missile that large would be difficult to carry by hand.
Tandem warheads are normally HEAT though, that's why they have a Tandem warhead at all? Tandem missiles are a warhead with two, thus tandem, charges. The first one detonate to reduce the effectiveness of ERA or spaced armor and the second contains the main anti armor charge.Most of not all top down AT weapons are Tandem.
AFAIK, most missles sre tandem if not they arnt HEAT. So the cages don't work.
They work against small drones dropping bombs, but Javelins are literally going to treat them like paper
I don't see how them blowing away a sedan could be seen as anything other than deliberate targeting. Also, the car stopped far short of the armored vehicles, seemingly as soon as the driver saw them, yet the Russians still fired at the completely stationary car multiple times.I mean it sucks, but this is what all those smug gloats about the drive by molotov attacks and resistance to the last man lead to. Drive a vehicle towards a vehicle column? Get treated like a threat.
Also unlike the deliberate Geneva Convention violations of Ukraine, there is nothing covering that. It's neither intentionally targeted at civilians nor widespread.
Yeah, why arent Zawhatshisname, Vindman, Chaney, and the pro-Ukraine posters enlisted yet?Apparently there is an Ukranian Foreign Legion now. Tons of people of the Ukrainian diaspora are joining, INCLUDING Brazilians of Ukranian descent. My mother is probably the only one I have seen so far that wants to genuinely support the country in a moral-ethical way (unlike the NPCs you see in Twitter).
Did they know for a fact that the car contained civilians or could it have contained the spread of irregular fighters shown attacking Russian vehicles? Is this part of a policy of intentional attacking civilians? A tragedy? Definitely and not something I want to see repeated. But if that was a car bomb or a molotov attack, the usual suspects would be crowing about how brave and cunning the Ukrainians are and how stupid and weak the Russians are.I don't see how them blowing away a sedan could be seen as anything other than deliberate targeting. Also, the car stopped far short of the armored vehicles, seemingly as soon as the driver saw them, yet the Russians still fired at the completely stationary car multiple times.
Except, again, the car stopped far short of the Russians. If the point was to attack them, one would expect the vehicle to charge right on in, not stop 50 feet short of them. So, again, I'm going to say it's an intentional targeting unless the Russians can show otherwise.Did they know for a fact that the car contained civilians or could it have contained the spread of irregular fighters shown attacking Russian vehicles? Is this part of a policy of intentional attacking civilians? A tragedy? Definitely and not something I want to see repeated. But if that was a car bomb or a molotov attack, the usual suspects would be crowing about how brave and cunning the Ukrainians are and how stupid and weak the Russians are.
You do you, it's pretty far from good but I wouldn't call it a warcrime. Though these days everything is a warcrime if Russia does it and nothing is if the Ukrainians do it. Just like when it was the middle east and everything the US did was a warcrime and nothing the insurgency did was.Except, again, the car stopped far short of the Russians. If the point was to attack them, one would expect the vehicle to charge right on in, not stop 50 feet short of them. So, again, I'm going to say it's an intentional targeting unless the Russians can show otherwise.
What......Tandem warheads are normally HEAT though, that's why they have a Tandem warhead at all? Tandem missiles are a warhead with two, thus tandem, charges. The first one detonate to reduce the effectiveness of ERA or spaced armor and the second contains the main anti armor charge.
I'm starting to feel like the people laughing at the Russians attempt at top mounted spaced armor don't even understand why they made the attempt in the first place.
No it's not going to stop an aerial launched ATGM, those are way too powerful for a half meter of spacing to matter against top armor. Now a top attack missiles like a Javelin or a TOW2? That might convert a near hit against a depressed tank into a near miss.
What......
Yes the Jave is a HEAT warhead. But it is not normal HEAT. .which SLATE armor would be good against.
It being tandem means there is a smaller explosion that basically destroys the cope cage, and the HEAT head goes right through the top of the tank.
And NEAR hit with a Jave or TOW? Maybe the TOW but the Jave doesn't really miss.
Also the space between the horrible SLAT armor and the top of the tank is not far enough to make a diffrence.
We have yet to see a single COPE Cage work.
That is something I noticed as well, the Ukrainians seem to love posturing with them, but the export anti-tank missiles they make for their own use appear to be doing most of the work.290 Javelins have been fired according to Ukraine. Yet we only have documentation of 13 Russian AFVs taken out by Javelins to the point they are write offs as opposed to a mission kill and still returnable to combat after repairs. An indication that the cages are working in combination with the ERA and other countermeasures such as smoke dischargers that saturate infrared sensors and lasers, and dazzlers plus the Russians own Infantry Teams hunting Ukrainian AT Teams.
In fact we are seeing UkA SOF in the rear zones primarily using the ole RPG series and Soviet ATGMs which are easier for them to source as they can capture the RuA's own stock to replenish.
Western Weapons are more propaganda hype than their actual impact which is minimal at best and like the TOWs in Syria, over blown in their actual operational impact in the fighting.
That is something I noticed as well, the Ukrainians seem to love posturing with them, but the export anti-tank missiles they make for their own use appear to be doing most of the work.
I had assumed they were just reselling them, but the Russians captured decent amounts of NLAWS and Javelins.
Pretty low the students were being mentioned as mostly Indian and Chinese, with China crowing that it proves they are respected.The news claimed that some 5000 Ukrainians and 1700 foreign students managed to get out of Sumi today. What are the chances that 99% of foreign students are African and Mid East males on the way westward?