Just like the first impeachment.
So, this is an interesting play.
So, this is an interesting play.
So, this is an interesting play.
Are they trying to troll republicans?
I usually hear the right talking about term limits.
Is the right gonna be against them now?
This just feels like them trying to change the rules of the game, because they weren't winning under the old rules.Sure....are they gonna introduce a similar bill for Congressmen and Senators....?
Oh lol so I'm kinda high on some edibles and didn't realize it was supreme court they're talking about, I was thinking congressThis just feels like them trying to change the rules of the game, because they weren't winning under the old rules.
I think there is widespread support for terms limits in Congress; in SCOTUS...no idea.
I'm very suspicious of the timing and motive behind this, as I'd never heard it put forth by anyone in mainstream politics before.
Nice, some Cheba Chews, or Dixie Elixers?Oh lol so I'm kinda high on some edibles and didn't realize it was supreme court they're talking about, I was thinking congress
So, this is an interesting play.
Something inspired off of sour patch kids called Stoney Patch.Nice, some Cheba Chews, or Dixie Elixers?
And yeah, with Congress term limits are actually rather popular across the political spectrum. With SCOTUS it's probably not widely supported, changing a very big part of our judicial system.
I don't think they can even do that without making it an amendment.So, this is an interesting play.
they can’t but they have done stuff like that before, like their bill to make DC a state, it is something that is blatantly unconstitutional but they propose it because when the other side opposes it the media will attack them anyway and ignore all nuance.I don't think they can even do that without making it an amendment.
You...you do know how amendments pass right? 3/4ths of the states need to agree, that is not even remotely feasible.Make it an Amendment then and make it effective immediately. If they want to tack on limits to the SC now go all the way and make it absolutely binding. That's more of a Win that a majority in the Zsc for a decade or two in my book.
Heh, let DC be a state, just move the Captial somewhere else first. Bet they would like that then.
Realistically, there is almost no chance it will be overturned or vacated.So, how likely is Roe v. Wade going to be affected by a new justice? I know multiple females I work with worrying that this will be undone.
So, how likely is Roe v. Wade going to be affected by a new justice? I know multiple females I work with worrying that this will be undone.