Yes you are moving the goal posts and proving my point.
If we don't have independent testers and we can't trust the medical industry or government to tell us the truth because they are actively censoring people and silencing whistleblowers, then we have no way of knowing.
That is the basics of this argument and what you keep dodging.
Quit projecting. I started with "This specific conspiracy is stupid because it could be easily detected by some fairly basic tests all pharmaceuticals are subjected to and are commonly done by indepent pharmacies and labs" and stayed there. You're the one who's changed their tune closing in on half a dozen times, I'm the one who's pointed out your many errors. You thought the test took enormous time and resources, then when that was proven wrong you moved the goalposts. When that was proven wrong you moved them again, and again, until now you've managed to walk yourself to claiming that anybody who's actually got the training to run the tests can't be trusted to perform them so there's literally
no way anything can possibly satisfy your ever-increasing series of demands. Your position is unreasonable, and unassailable by any reason, as they say-
“You cannot reason people out of a position that they did not reason themselves into.” ― Ben Goldacre, Bad Science
That is not how conspiracies work.
All a coverup needs is people in positions that control investigations and gate keep who has access to all relevant material.
Which is kinda my point, this specific bit of material is
utterly impossible to gatekeep. It can be checked by
anybody with basic training and equipment present in tens of millions of labs. You might as well posit that there's a giant alien space station on the hundreds of millions of people with telescopes are somehow being gatekept from noticing it. It's no less absurd a proposition.
Pfizer a company that has a history of corruption spanning decades, is able to get away with its shit because it has bought off politicians, buys the media to suppress information by not reporting on it and maligning truthful information as not true, and silences whistleblowers.
We've seen this repeatably for the past 2 years. Someone comes out and challenges the establishment narrative, immediately the establishment smears them in the press, if they work for establishment institution or business they are fired, if they have a wiki page it is immediately edited to either smear them or deleted altogether, and the government then piles on pressure by having front men like Fauci lie.
So long as the majority of the masses are gaslit, the few who know the truth are not a threat as the masses believe the propaganda lies so strongly that they resist anything that challenges their bubble.
The problem here is your notion that it's a "few." It would be thousands to tens of thousands since these tests are going to be run on every batch multiple times by multiple independent labs, that's how it's done by default.
So back to the Pharmacist in Florida:
When does he ever handle PZP? A veterinary drug not approved for human use and in a supposedly separate supply chain. If someone asks about it, will he actually do the test or just laugh it off, or say he will look into it only to dismiss it and lie about testing? If he does obtain PZP, can he even use the testing equipment without tipping his bosses off and then being fired and smeared for wasting time and resources or any other reason? Given that Pfizer was forced kicking and screaming to release vaccine data they wanted sealed for 75 years alongside the FDA, and has already silenced several employees who spoke to Project Veritas, plus lied, we can't trust them.
I'm trying to wrap my head around the idea that you think the Pharmacist in Florida would ever
need to have handled PZP. I can only presume that, given you've shown you have no inkling of the science involved, you're imagining that he loads two vials into a machine and a green light turns on if they're the same or some such nonsense.
Of course he doesn't handle PZP, he doesn't need to for this test. He tests the vaccine, gets a result (Which is not "It's a vaccine" it's a series of lines on a graph) and then looks up what the pattern of lines matches on either a database or his trusty lab manual. And you bet your britches it's got things "outside the normal supply chain," he also likely never handles cocaine but if you hand him a baggy he'd be able to identify it. The entire point of these tests is to identify if a drug has been counterfeited, imitated, diluted, contaminated, or otherwise isn't kosher for some reason. So needless to say, they don't just know "what's the same supply chain" but rather access an extremely extensive catalogue of just about every compound known to man.
To compare with my own work, I can identify, quite reliably, if a mineral sample I'm spectrum-testing contains uranium. It produces a distinctive black line at 653.5 nanometers and anything containing uranium has that line. I know that one by heart due to extensive experience with uranium-bearing minerals, but if I didn't I could crack open my lab manuals and look it up easily. Know what I don't need?
A block of uranium on my desk. But you, with your extreme ignorance of basic science, imagine that nobody who does not have a block of uranium on their desk can identify uranium-bearing minerals, or to abandon the metaphor, that nobody who doesn't handle PZP is going to be able to open their reference guides and look up PZP's spectrum. Your arguments are bad because you are not basing them on any facts, but hysterical feels. If you had facts, you wouldn't keep making this kind of basic error.
Now lets say he clears the hurdles here and does the test and it comes back positive. He publishes the findings. Now the MSM smears him as a crackpot, a fully paid for 'expert' runs an 'independent ' test that says its not true. Pfizer bribes the FDA to say what it wants said and we know from the Project Veritas expose that Pfizer stage manages FDA visits and even its employees don't know all that is going on or into the vials.
Then the Pharmacist gets fired and threatened with revocation of his license and blacklisted.
We have seen this happen repeatably and the mass hysteria promoted by governments around the world is now weaponized into tyranny.
Hence we need independent testers who are not beholden to either the medical industry or government, we need thousands of them, so the chances of the Establishment in smearing them successfully are less successful if they should ascertain PZP and/or something else that shouldn't be there are indeed in the vaccines.
They also need access to the VAERS data, because the batch numbers are in it and some batches are producing more AEs than others and this can be back tracked to specific factories and the Independent Investigators need access that is unimpeded and not staged managed and with no warning that they are coming like an FDA visit would give. That way a factory doesn't have any warning to hide shit.
Well good news,
here it is. VAERS data can be accessed by anybody with an internet connection, too bad for your ignorant arguments. Given your behavior so far, I have little doubt your next step is to move the goalposts as always and claim you need
more data and it isn't good enough for some asinine reason.
If you truly believe in transparency, you would support this initiative and we can either put all of this to rest and conclude the vaccines just are cytotoxic by inherent nature of the spike protein, or the companies are adding shit to the vaccines that should not be in them and are not disclosed.
Or keep dodging the basic issue here.
Given we can already do everything you're asking for,
of course I support that initiative, in the same sense that I support legalizing oatmeal. Now, are there other concerns? Of course, I'm deeply distrustful of their need to wait 75 years to release data and I'd like to see some other research areas opened up. But this
specific conspiracy theory about PZP? Obvious balderdash and a smokescreen for whatever's really going on.
"Go out, get COVID, and ignore the science, or listen to Chris Witty."
